Every week, a new interpretation

ImageImageImage
Tiger_heart
Member
Member
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 1:28 pm

Every week, a new interpretation

Post by Tiger_heart » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:32 pm

tonight's feature: Obstruction...what a call :crazy


User avatar
weststigers4life
Member
Member
Posts: 1313
Joined: Fri 17 Jun, 2011 1:34 pm

Post by weststigers4life » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:34 pm

Still shaking my head how they awarded the try to Walsh, if the video ref isn't dropped they need to sack Harrigan.


Posted using RoarFEED 2012

Tiger_heart
Member
Member
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 1:28 pm

Post by Tiger_heart » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:36 pm

Bill is probably thinking about what to say now...

saundo1982
Member
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Fri 25 Feb, 2011 1:08 pm

Post by saundo1982 » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:37 pm

It shouldn't have been a try, but Timmy should have kept running towards Walsh. Had ended up 1m away as opposed to 4m could have put a different spin on things.


Posted using RoarFEED 2012

galea#11
Member
Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Sun 02 Aug, 2009 2:27 pm

Post by galea#11 » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:38 pm

i thought it should of been try if the tigers player didnt slip over would we care if moltzen was tapped ?


bundyboy
Member
Member
Posts: 299
Joined: Fri 06 Apr, 2012 11:12 pm

Post by bundyboy » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:40 pm

The video ref must have still been in origin mode ! What a joke


Posted using RoarFEED 2012

User avatar
MacDougall
Member
Member
Posts: 7915
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 4:03 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Post by MacDougall » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:42 pm

Moltzen should have still attempted the friggin tackle but you're right it was a dud call.

I get the feeling that the video ref didn't even look at Moltzen and was just looking at BMM falling over his shadow. I really think that the video ref should have the commentators in his ear when adjudicating just in case he fails to see certain things.

Tiger_heart
Member
Member
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 1:28 pm

Post by Tiger_heart » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:46 pm

Commentators advising refs? That's stretching it...

User avatar
MacDougall
Member
Member
Posts: 7915
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 4:03 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Post by MacDougall » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:50 pm

Not advising. Just the audio stream of the broadcast playing in the box just in case he misses something obvious. I am pretty sure he didn't even look at Moltzen because blind Freddy would have called that a no try.

hellman
Member
Member
Posts: 561
Joined: Thu 01 Mar, 2012 5:24 pm

Post by hellman » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 9:54 pm

That try was a terrible decision.

User avatar
TIGER
Member
Member
Posts: 3018
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 10:40 am

Post by TIGER » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 10:17 pm

Take the blinkers off it was a try, no Tigers player was obstructed they slipped over without any help.

User avatar
AmericanHistoryX
Member
Member
Posts: 7181
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 11:15 am
Location: Ho Chi Min City

Post by AmericanHistoryX » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 10:18 pm

Beautiful dummy by Walsh though.


Posted using RoarFEED 2012
Clouds of Dust, Buckets of Blood

Image
"They overcame the impossible by doing the unthinkable"

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 27503
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 10:20 pm

Moltzen in his true colours,.....decides its preferable to stop playing & have a whinge rather than give it everything

Not a first graders ringoll

mitch2040
Member
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat 26 Nov, 2011 8:49 am

Post by mitch2040 » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 10:25 pm

I agree ink, I can't wait till moltz is a utility.


Posted using RoarFEED 2012

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 39002
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm

Post by happy tiger » Sat 14 Jul, 2012 10:27 pm

MacDougall wrote:Moltzen should have still attempted the friggin tackle but you're right it was a dud call.

I get the feeling that the video ref didn't even look at Moltzen and was just looking at BMM falling over his shadow. I really think that the video ref should have the commentators in his ear when adjudicating just in case he fails to see certain things.
Yeah agree I think they thought Moltzen was playing for the penalty

At least if Moltzen tries to attempt to make the tackle we would of got the penalty

User avatar
smeghead
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9451
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 11:56 pm

Post by smeghead » Sun 15 Jul, 2012 8:57 am

I think if Tim continues and attempts a tackle it is a no try call.

One of those things though. it is all a lottery this season
Image

User avatar
TIGER
Member
Member
Posts: 3018
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 10:40 am

Post by TIGER » Sun 15 Jul, 2012 9:41 am

I agree i hate how players appeal to the ref instead of playing on then asking the question but imo Moltzen wouldn't of got near the try scorer anyway.

User avatar
underdog
Member
Member
Posts: 5158
Joined: Tue 27 Apr, 2010 5:25 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post by underdog » Sun 15 Jul, 2012 9:49 am

Definate no try - Moltzen gets Barged into to in goal!!! The video ref was looking at the wrong part of the scene, as Woods slipping over did provide a fairly decent distraction.
Image

Post Reply