According to Tim Sheens

ImageImageImage
Kickoff:
Venue:
Telecast:
User avatar
Tigersmurf
Member
Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue 20 Oct, 2009 8:40 pm

Re: According to Tim Sheens

Post by Tigersmurf » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 10:36 am

[quote="hybrid_tiger"
Sheens had the choice to leave Farah at #9, yet still moved him to #7 despite publicly admitting it would weaken yet another position. You can't blame that on injuries, just stubbornness (as the OP correctly pointed out) in that Farah at #7 has never work yet Sheens still persists with it.[/quote]

Spot on Hybrid, and the fact that we could only score 6 points against a slightly depleted Souths side (whom I might add defended really well), emphasises the fact that Humble deserved a shot.

Is Benji still a "playmaker?" He certainly isn't a ball runner. So what is he?


User avatar
barrytiger
Member
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 8:59 pm
Location: Annandale
Contact:

Post by barrytiger » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 10:39 am


User avatar
Tigerdave
Member
Member
Posts: 10446
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 6:04 am
Location: Lismore

Post by Tigerdave » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 10:41 am

the team lacked hunger? no joke, we've lacked hunger for some time, we very rarely put teams to the sword despite the obvious ability of our players

User avatar
underdog
Member
Member
Posts: 5090
Joined: Tue 27 Apr, 2010 5:25 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post by underdog » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 11:09 am

when the "much malingned" John Sutton can pretty much bust up the middle at will, and consistently out-muscles our starting prop (Blair) and our starting hooker (Iosefa) you know you have serious issues up the middle.

Iosefas punch is about as good as Humbles Zip and speed - having said that Humble is a build or two smaller than Iosefa, yet makes better tackles in and around the ruck.

I've had enough of defending him.

Drop Blair to State cup as well as Iosefa.
Image

User avatar
851
Member
Member
Posts: 5477
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 6:38 pm

Post by 851 » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 11:38 am

alex wrote:Benji at 7 has never worked.
Farah at 7 has never worked.
Sheens doesn't want to use Miller, Humble or Moltzen at 7.
What does this mean?
We need a new 7.
No,we need a new coach,and ASAP. :evil:
Go hard or go home


TigersFan4Life
Member
Member
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:39 pm

Post by TigersFan4Life » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 11:51 am

The Panthers are out of the finals race and had little to play for yet managed to beat Cronulla at Shark Park on Saturday night. What was our excuse?

User avatar
spudoakes
Member
Member
Posts: 481
Joined: Wed 24 Feb, 2010 9:56 pm

Post by spudoakes » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 1:33 pm

i like sheens he's turned this club around but he has to go. We should have thanked him for what he's done but moved him on.

User avatar
alex
Member
Member
Posts: 3624
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 7:58 pm
Location: Haberfield

Post by alex » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 1:36 pm

851 wrote:
alex wrote:Benji at 7 has never worked.
Farah at 7 has never worked.
Sheens doesn't want to use Miller, Humble or Moltzen at 7.
What does this mean?
We need a new 7.
No,we need a new coach,and ASAP. :evil:
I agree we need a new coach, I think that's the major problem with the club at the moment. I'm a fan of Miller and I think a new coach may give him a run a la Reynolds at Souths.

User avatar
dermo
Member
Member
Posts: 563
Joined: Sun 20 Feb, 2011 3:02 pm

Post by dermo » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 1:43 pm

hybrid_tiger wrote:
dermo wrote:
hybrid_tiger wrote:
dermo wrote: half the team was missing.
Souths were missing their two best players but of course not a word about this...


You've taken what i said completely out of context. The OP was criticising Sheens for his apparent stubbornness with his player selections, what i meant is with half the team missing he hardly had alot of choice
Sheens had the choice to leave Farah at #9, yet still moved him to #7 despite publicly admitting it would weaken yet another position. You can't blame that on injuries, just stubbornness (as the OP correctly pointed out) in that Farah at #7 has never work yet Sheens still persists with it.


Of course that can be blamed on injuries, he wouldn't have to have made that decision had it not been for injuries. The OP was implying that Sheens was wrong to say the team lacked hunger, and that he should've taken full responsibility for the loss. Sheens wasn't the one who missed 45 tackles was he

User avatar
smeghead
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9451
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 11:56 pm

Post by smeghead » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 1:57 pm

He will still pick the players who missed them though
Image

User avatar
Fraze23
Member
Member
Posts: 1874
Joined: Thu 15 Jul, 2010 4:21 pm
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Post by Fraze23 » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 3:10 pm

One of the responses that really gets my goat is when people say, "it wasn't the coach who was missing tackles". Yeah while that is true it is the coaches job to do something about it when we do miss tackles. Revise our defensive structure, introduce new training techniques, do something, anything! I've never been one to call for Sheens' head but I've had a gut full. I'm sick of the selections, sick of the poor attitude we display week in week out, sick of excuses. It's time something was done about it.

User avatar
kh_canada
Member
Member
Posts: 1727
Joined: Tue 12 Jun, 2012 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by kh_canada » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 3:31 pm

Yeah, we need new techniques, new structures, something to change what we are doing now cause it isn't working


Posted using RoarFEED 2012
The Huth... the Huth... the Huth is on fire

User avatar
smeghead
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9451
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 11:56 pm

Post by smeghead » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 3:37 pm

Not fit enough, not skilled enough, not tough enough, not hungry enough, not mentally capable of consitent football and not a consequence in sight.

Welcome to the footballing paradise created by Sheens and his old boys reunion staff.

Anyway that will do me for a while I think. No point even thinking about the last game anymore, it is time to build up some passion and motivation to drag my backside out to CSS Monday week and start all over again
Image

User avatar
Tigersmurf
Member
Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue 20 Oct, 2009 8:40 pm

Post by Tigersmurf » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 3:40 pm

We need discipline, structure and control. The Sheens and Benji show are unlikely to provide this.

I believe a S Kearney is available! Oh that's right we still have a king that sits on his throne and counts his money.

Ever feel like you have been the victim of a Nigerian scam? This is all an elaborate setup originally concocted in 2002.

User avatar
hybrid_tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 4564
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 10:49 am
Location: Latchem Robinson Stand

Post by hybrid_tiger » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 3:57 pm

dermo wrote:
Of course that can be blamed on injuries, he wouldn't have to have made that decision had it not been for injuries. The OP was implying that Sheens was wrong to say the team lacked hunger, and that he should've taken full responsibility for the loss. Sheens wasn't the one who missed 45 tackles was he
No, Sheens didn't have to make that decision, injuries or no injuries. He had players to fill the #7 role but chose to move the NSW hooker instead. That was not forced by injury.

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 27054
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 4:39 pm

There are 100s of these threads over the last 6 years......we whinge and complain about the same thing over and over, because nothing has changed...not a thing

We are pretenders, show ponies, pretty boys - frauds.

Image

bundyboy
Member
Member
Posts: 299
Joined: Fri 06 Apr, 2012 11:12 pm

Post by bundyboy » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 4:47 pm

[quote="innsaneink"]There are 100s of these threads over the last 6 years......we whinge and complain about the same thing over and over, because nothing has changed...not a thing

We are pretenders, show ponies, pretty boys - frauds.

[img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hp ... 7404_n.jpg[/img][/quote
It needs a question mark after the name sheens? Then can I buy one, or two?


Posted using RoarFEED 2012

smoking gun
Member
Member
Posts: 1287
Joined: Fri 24 Jun, 2011 12:29 pm
Location: Sydney, nsw

Post by smoking gun » Mon 30 Jul, 2012 5:37 pm

46%

Post Reply