Player and match stats

ImageImageImage
Post Reply
User avatar
willow
Member
Member
Posts: 32710
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: The Village

Player and match stats

Post by willow » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:11 am

1. Moltzen - 52 metres in attack, 1 tackle break, 10 tackles, 1 missed tackle, 1 error

2. Reddy - 56 metres in attack, 1tackle break, 4 tackles, 4 missed tackles, 1 error

3. Ayshford - 102 metres in attack, 1 offload, 3 tackle breaks, 10 tackles, 1 missed tackle, 2 errors

4. Lawrence - 69 metres in attack, 13 tackles, 2 missed tackles, 1 error

5. Tedesco - 130 metres in attack, 1 try, 3 tackle breaks, 2 tackles, 1 missed tackle, 1 error

6. Marshall - 59 metres in attack ,1 try, 1tackle break, 7 tackles, 4 missed tackles

7. Anasta - 36 metres in attack, 2 goals, 1 tackle break, 16 tackles, 1 missed tackle

8. Woods - 152 metres in attack, 3 offloads, 1tackle break, 48 tackles, 2 missed tackles

9. Farah - 47 metres in attack, 2 try assists, 2 offloads, 51 tackles, 2 missed tackles

10. Buchanan - 100 metres in attack, 1offload, 3 tackle breaks, 27 tackles, 1 missed tackle

11. Thompson - 41 metres in attack, 1 tackle break, 30 tackles, 1 missed tackle

12. Bell - 45 metres in attack, 37 tackles

13. Blair - 70 metres in attack, 1 offload, 1 tackle break, 20 tackles, 1 missed tackle, 1 error

14. BMM - 53 metres in attack, 2 offloads, 1 tackle break, 16 tackles, 1 missed tackle, 1 error

15. Seumanufagai - 36 metres in attack, 17 tackles, 1 missed tackle

16. Pettybourne - 87 metres in attack, 1 tackle break, 19 tackles, 1 error

17. Akaoula - 30 metres in attack, 9 tackles


Try assists = 2
Offloads = 10
Tackles made = 336
1 on 1tackle = 14
Missed tackles = 23
Tackle breaks = 18
Total metres = 1165
Possession = 52%
Completion rate = 28/33 = 85%
Errors = 9
Penalties conceded = 14


stevetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5111
Joined: Mon 25 Feb, 2013 7:59 am

Post by stevetiger » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:20 am

Look at Tedesco's metres compared to Moltzen. I'm surprised our backrow doesn't have more metres gained - they were great.

Woods is a demon.

User avatar
avocadoontoast
Member
Member
Posts: 1212
Joined: Fri 11 Sep, 2009 10:53 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Post by avocadoontoast » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:22 am

Bloody hell what a performance by Woods. If he doesn't start in Origin there is something seriously wrong..

User avatar
smeghead
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9451
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 11:56 pm

Post by smeghead » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:27 am

Woods should get a test jersey IMHO
Image

monkey
Member
Member
Posts: 579
Joined: Wed 11 May, 2011 5:43 am

Post by monkey » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:32 am

We should play the storm every week as its the only time Blair has half a go

Posted using RoarFEED 2013


User avatar
willow
Member
Member
Posts: 32710
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: The Village

Post by willow » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:34 am

smeghead wrote:Woods should get a test jersey IMHO
I agree, he'd be a handy option coming off the bench and his workrate is second to none.

User avatar
happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 40162
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm

Post by happy tiger » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:38 am

Crazy ,52% percent of the ball ,yet the Storm ran for an extra 300 metres

User avatar
willow
Member
Member
Posts: 32710
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: The Village

Post by willow » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:41 am

happy tiger wrote:Crazy ,52% percent of the ball ,yet the Storm ran for an extra 300 metres
Half the problem there is our defence waits for them to come, whereas they attack with their defence which was noticeable last night, plus they were more expansive with the ball than we were.

User avatar
Justo
Member
Member
Posts: 722
Joined: Thu 05 Apr, 2012 2:31 pm

Post by Justo » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:43 am

Woods. Wow. Legend.

Tedesco, brilliant. Only 1 missed tackle, expensive one.

Furious1
Member
Member
Posts: 961
Joined: Thu 09 Jun, 2011 6:42 pm

Post by Furious1 » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:53 am

happy tiger wrote:Crazy ,52% percent of the ball ,yet the Storm ran for an extra 300 metres
Im more surprised at the 52% possession given the 14-7 penalty count

Boonboon2
Member
Member
Posts: 1801
Joined: Tue 12 Feb, 2013 5:10 pm

Post by Boonboon2 » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 8:54 am

In the paper the possesion was 52% Storm, 48% tigers

User avatar
jirskyr
Member
Member
Posts: 5721
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:00 pm

Post by jirskyr » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 9:44 am

happy tiger wrote:Crazy ,52% percent of the ball ,yet the Storm ran for an extra 300 metres
Yeah but if you hold the ball 10 out from your opposition's line for a few sets, you don't get much meterage for your possession.

Storm ran in two mid-distance tries at the end, whereas we hardly made any lengthy line-breaks. Storm also made lots of metres as we faded in the last 10.

User avatar
kh_canada
Member
Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue 12 Jun, 2012 2:08 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by kh_canada » Tue 09 Apr, 2013 1:09 pm

^ Very true J

I'd like to point out despite the forwards making most of the tackling, they missed less tackles combined compared to some outside backs. They were once again brilliant this week & also quite a few great offloads
The Huth... the Huth... the Huth is on fire

Post Reply