Signing Suggestions & Rumours THREAD..

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9136
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Signing Suggestions & Rumours THREAD..

Unread post by Yossarian » Wed 06 Dec, 2017 8:09 pm

I heard 700k was more accurate.


TYGA
Member
Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat 23 May, 2015 11:17 pm
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 49 times

Unread post by TYGA » Wed 06 Dec, 2017 9:28 pm

We paid Packer our highest paid prop 575k p.a.
Matulino was not wanted when we signed him due to injury Newcastle and Warriors went cold.
The figures reported on WT are nonsense designed to make us look incompetent. The numbers would add up to cap of 12m if you add them
Up.

Telltails
Member
Member
Posts: 1894
Joined: Fri 18 Apr, 2014 3:24 pm
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 46 times

Unread post by Telltails » Wed 06 Dec, 2017 10:41 pm

Interesting. If different sources/people report such different figures very hard to determine who really knows and who is talking through their hat. Just found his contract particularly interesting because of the vast difference in reported figures.
Regardless hope he is good value for us.

User avatar
sideline eye
Member
Member
Posts: 828
Joined: Fri 07 Mar, 2014 5:42 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 15 times

Unread post by sideline eye » Wed 06 Dec, 2017 11:01 pm

I really couldn't give a rat's what we paid for Matulino. As long as I see him playing at his best in our jersey, that's all I need; the money is a matter for administrators, coaches and CEOs, although it does seem that we have plenty of those on our forum.

User avatar
steve-o
Member
Member
Posts: 1541
Joined: Tue 14 Sep, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: West Pennant Hills
Has liked: 41 times
Been liked: 30 times

Unread post by steve-o » Wed 06 Dec, 2017 11:02 pm

Yossarian wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 8:09 pm
I heard 700k was more accurate.
Are we talking per annum here?
Year of last finals appearance:
2017 - Storm, Roosters, Broncos, Eels, Sharks, Sea Eagles, Panthers, Cowboys
2016 - Raiders, Bulldogs, Titans
2015 - Rabbitohs, Dragons
2013 - Knights
2011 - Tigers, Warriors


User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 18806
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 203 times

Unread post by GNR4LIFE » Wed 06 Dec, 2017 11:04 pm

Say we're paying Packerlino 1 million between them, that is a lot better value than what we were paying the fake captain and Ava.

fergiefurr
Member
Member
Posts: 2765
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 1:18 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 15 times

Unread post by fergiefurr » Wed 06 Dec, 2017 11:08 pm

TigerKapa wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 5:30 pm
Balmain Boy wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 5:19 pm
Telltails wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 4:47 pm
tiger05premier wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 4:34 pm


I can recall reading Matulino's deal being worth $475.

So this is way off then ...
http://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/league/91908 ... ers-report
Who knows? Could be including TPAs, or could be wild speculation from someone with no info inside the club. Or could be right.
The 475k figure came from somewhere here who has inside info. I think it may have been Yossarian.
Im fairly certain I recall an interview with (I think) the Kelly dude who came to the club this year on MMM. It wasn’t long after the Matulino signing, he was asked about it and the reported price tag. From memory he actually said ‘it’s more like $450-$500kpa’

User avatar
Chris
Member
Member
Posts: 4480
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 12:00 am
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 16 times

Unread post by Chris » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 3:49 am

I take every player's price tag with a grain of salt.

tigerap
Member
Member
Posts: 1690
Joined: Tue 06 Oct, 2015 10:08 pm
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 70 times

Unread post by tigerap » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 4:51 am

Chris wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 3:49 am
I take every player's price tag with a grain of salt.
Add a dash of pepper and olive oil and it’s a easier to swallow

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9136
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast
Has liked: 38 times
Been liked: 115 times

Unread post by Yossarian » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 12:23 pm

steve-o wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 11:02 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 8:09 pm
I heard 700k was more accurate.
Are we talking per annum here?
Yeah

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 36289
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 72 times

Unread post by happy tiger » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:20 pm

Chris wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 3:49 am
I take every player's price tag with a grain of salt.
Yeah true , especially hen you have no idea if the figures quoted are with or without TPA's

Actually it would be interesting to find out how many players in the NRL actually get TPA's

TonyTiger
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon 04 Dec, 2017 12:41 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Unread post by TonyTiger » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:21 pm

Don’t count your pennies with Packer, he is our best acquisition and should be captain next year. He’s a tackling machine with Arthur Beetson style offloads, throw in the mongrel as a bonus!

User avatar
Geo.
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 25146
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW.
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 391 times

Unread post by Geo. » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:32 pm

happy tiger wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:20 pm
Chris wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 3:49 am
I take every player's price tag with a grain of salt.
Yeah true , especially hen you have no idea if the figures quoted are with or without TPA's

Actually it would be interesting to find out how many players in the NRL actually get TPA's
Not as many as you would think....Kenty said on NRL 360 earlier in the Year something like 6 or 7% of players receive Non-Club Affiliated TPA's..The elite players and personality players of course..

I don't think many journeyman of standard NRL player would be attractive to sponsors for promotional purposes...
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..
Tiger Watto wrote:
Fri 03 Nov, 2017 8:07 am
Geo nailed it...

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 36289
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 72 times

Unread post by happy tiger » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:39 pm

Geo. wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:32 pm
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:20 pm
Chris wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 3:49 am
I take every player's price tag with a grain of salt.
Yeah true , especially hen you have no idea if the figures quoted are with or without TPA's

Actually it would be interesting to find out how many players in the NRL actually get TPA's
Not as many as you would think....Kenty said on NRL 360 earlier in the Year something like 6 or 7% of players receive Non-Club Affiliated TPA's..The elite players and personality players of course..

I don't think many journeyman of standard NRL player would be attractive to sponsors for promotional purposes...
So we are talking on average 2 players per club

Until we get to the Boosters who have 60% of their rosters in TPA's or about 17 players

Kent made one good point the other night , since TPA's were introduced the salary cap has tripled

Do we really need them at all or should they be limited to say 3 players per club

User avatar
barra
Member
Member
Posts: 2060
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: Sth Coast
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 11 times

Unread post by barra » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 2:06 pm

happy tiger wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:39 pm
Geo. wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:32 pm
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:20 pm
Chris wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 3:49 am
I take every player's price tag with a grain of salt.
Yeah true , especially hen you have no idea if the figures quoted are with or without TPA's

Actually it would be interesting to find out how many players in the NRL actually get TPA's
Not as many as you would think....Kenty said on NRL 360 earlier in the Year something like 6 or 7% of players receive Non-Club Affiliated TPA's..The elite players and personality players of course..

I don't think many journeyman of standard NRL player would be attractive to sponsors for promotional purposes...
So we are talking on average 2 players per club

Until we get to the Boosters who have 60% of their rosters in TPA's or about 17 players

Kent made one good point the other night , since TPA's were introduced the salary cap has tripled

Do we really need them at all or should they be limited to say 3 players per club
I think any sort of restrictions will be viewed by the RLPA as a restraint... we need to find another way.

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 36289
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 72 times

Unread post by happy tiger » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 2:17 pm

barra wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 2:06 pm
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:39 pm
Geo. wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:32 pm
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 1:20 pm


Yeah true , especially hen you have no idea if the figures quoted are with or without TPA's

Actually it would be interesting to find out how many players in the NRL actually get TPA's
Not as many as you would think....Kenty said on NRL 360 earlier in the Year something like 6 or 7% of players receive Non-Club Affiliated TPA's..The elite players and personality players of course..

I don't think many journeyman of standard NRL player would be attractive to sponsors for promotional purposes...
So we are talking on average 2 players per club

Until we get to the Boosters who have 60% of their rosters in TPA's or about 17 players

Kent made one good point the other night , since TPA's were introduced the salary cap has tripled

Do we really need them at all or should they be limited to say 3 players per club
I think any sort of restrictions will be viewed by the RLPA as a restraint... we need to find another way.
Make them all take up celebrity boxing :D

These blokes have the best deal , they've ever had , lets see what they offer now they are supposedly part of the game and its integrity / finances

When they don't do anymore than they currently offer , shove that down their throats and take them to court for falsely taking liberties on our games behalf

Watch them squirm out of that

Earl
Member
Member
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sat 18 Feb, 2017 9:21 am
Has liked: 141 times
Been liked: 89 times

Unread post by Earl » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 2:23 pm

Yossarian wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 12:23 pm
steve-o wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 11:02 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 8:09 pm
I heard 700k was more accurate.
Are we talking per annum here?
Yeah
That sounds too much to me. I hope it turns out okay. I reckon we've overpaid for Reynolds, Packer and Matulino.

User avatar
Geo.
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 25146
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW.
Has liked: 256 times
Been liked: 391 times

Unread post by Geo. » Thu 07 Dec, 2017 2:35 pm

Earl wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 2:23 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Thu 07 Dec, 2017 12:23 pm
steve-o wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 11:02 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Wed 06 Dec, 2017 8:09 pm
I heard 700k was more accurate.
Are we talking per annum here?
Yeah
That sounds too much to me. I hope it turns out okay. I reckon we've overpaid for Reynolds, Packer and Matulino.
How much would you have paid Earl..?
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..
Tiger Watto wrote:
Fri 03 Nov, 2017 8:07 am
Geo nailed it...

Post Reply

Return to “Player Contract Rumours & Discussion”