JEREMY MARSHALL-KING

Elderslie Tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 321
Joined: Fri 28 Apr, 2017 4:09 pm

JEREMY MARSHALL-KING

Post by Elderslie Tiger » Sun 05 Nov, 2017 5:14 pm

Reports saying he's been signed by Bulldogs suppose you cant keep em all unless your a Rooster Bronco or Shark


User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22477
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sun 05 Nov, 2017 5:21 pm

Pretty sure we'd have been able to keep him had we wanted him, but he got a better off from the Dogs. But yeah, it's a conspiracy lol.

WT2K
Member
Member
Posts: 3899
Joined: Thu 04 May, 2017 5:18 pm

Post by WT2K » Sun 05 Nov, 2017 5:25 pm

Dogs offered a top 30 spot, we offered him 2nd tier contract
No more plodders!
:sign:

Earl
Member
Member
Posts: 2006
Joined: Sat 18 Feb, 2017 9:21 am

Post by Earl » Sun 05 Nov, 2017 5:43 pm

wt00 wrote:
Sun 05 Nov, 2017 5:25 pm
Dogs offered a top 30 spot, we offered him 2nd tier contract
I figure that is what happened. I wish him the best. He seemed like a good player and a decent guy as well.

bp tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Sun 19 Jun, 2011 6:35 pm

Post by bp tiger » Sun 05 Nov, 2017 7:11 pm

he has stayed on a 2nd tier contract, wanted to play with his brother. but really not happy with what he was offered.


TYGA
Member
Member
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat 23 May, 2015 11:17 pm

Post by TYGA » Sun 05 Nov, 2017 7:13 pm

Not a top 30 player good luck to him at the Bulldogs,

User avatar
Fraze23
Member
Member
Posts: 1920
Joined: Thu 15 Jul, 2010 4:21 pm
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Post by Fraze23 » Sun 05 Nov, 2017 7:24 pm

He didn't look out of place when he played first grade this year. Best of luck to him, hope he goes well at the Dogs.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22477
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sun 05 Nov, 2017 7:41 pm

With the Dogs average (that's being polite) spine, he's a big chance of seeing game time there. It was a no brainier for him.

will1999
Member
Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Wed 16 Nov, 2016 2:52 am

Post by will1999 » Mon 06 Nov, 2017 1:06 am

1. Hopoate
6. Foran
7. Mbye
9. Lichea/ JMK

bathursttiger
Member
Member
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu 02 Dec, 2010 5:21 pm

Post by bathursttiger » Mon 06 Nov, 2017 4:15 am

Bulldogs buying a few cheapies to fill their list of 30.

User avatar
TIGER
Member
Member
Posts: 3492
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 10:40 am

Post by TIGER » Sat 11 Nov, 2017 7:19 pm

Good luck Jeremy.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22477
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 11 Nov, 2017 7:24 pm

will1999 wrote:
Mon 06 Nov, 2017 1:06 am
1. Hopoate
6. Foran
7. Mbye
9. Lichea/ JMK
And some say our spine looks bad.

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9699
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast

Post by Yossarian » Sat 11 Nov, 2017 8:10 pm

He's a tryer and defends well but he's a long way off being a NRL regular.

Nelson
Member
Member
Posts: 3311
Joined: Sat 31 Oct, 2015 11:17 am

Post by Nelson » Sat 11 Nov, 2017 8:33 pm

I can't see him being in their starting 17, which I imagine will be something like:

1. Will Hopoate
2. Brett Morris
3. Josh Morris
4. Brenko Lee
5. Marcelo Montoya
6. Kieran Foran
7. Moses Mbye
8. Aaron Woods
9. Michael Lichaa
10. Aiden Tolman
11. Josh Jackson
12. Adam Elliott
13. David Klemmer

14. Fa'amanu Brown
15. Danny Fualalo
16. Raymond Faitala-Mariner
17. Greg Eastwood

...an injury to Brown or Lichaa and he might be looking at some first grade though. Pretty sure the Bulldogs will run a hooker as a utility next year, their forward depth is pretty rubbish for a 4 big men bench and if Lichaa is going to be running a lot more (as he should be) they'll want to dial him back from 80 minutes.

User avatar
851
Member
Member
Posts: 6369
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 6:38 pm

Post by 851 » Sat 11 Nov, 2017 8:57 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 11 Nov, 2017 7:24 pm
will1999 wrote:
Mon 06 Nov, 2017 1:06 am
1. Hopoate
6. Foran
7. Mbye
9. Lichea/ JMK
And some say our spine looks bad.
Hoppa at 1 has better form than Tui
Foran is better than Reynolds
Mbye and Brooks a dead heat
Liccha without Des's boring game plan is better than Liddle.
So not a great argument
Go hard or go home

User avatar
WestsBenTigers
Member
Member
Posts: 1704
Joined: Wed 05 Oct, 2016 11:14 am

Post by WestsBenTigers » Sat 11 Nov, 2017 8:59 pm

851 wrote:
Sat 11 Nov, 2017 8:57 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 11 Nov, 2017 7:24 pm
will1999 wrote:
Mon 06 Nov, 2017 1:06 am
1. Hopoate
6. Foran
7. Mbye
9. Lichea/ JMK
And some say our spine looks bad.
Hoppa at 1 has better form than Tui
Foran is better than Reynolds
Mbye and Brooks a dead heat
Liccha without Des's boring game plan is better than Liddle.
So not a great argument
You have got to be kidding

Are you a dogs supporter or an anti-tigers supporter

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22477
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 11 Nov, 2017 9:03 pm

851 wrote:
Sat 11 Nov, 2017 8:57 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 11 Nov, 2017 7:24 pm
will1999 wrote:
Mon 06 Nov, 2017 1:06 am
1. Hopoate
6. Foran
7. Mbye
9. Lichea/ JMK
And some say our spine looks bad.
Hoppa at 1 has better form than Tui
Foran is better than Reynolds
Mbye and Brooks a dead heat
Liccha without Des's boring game plan is better than Liddle.
So not a great argument
Hoppa is the most ineffective fullback in the comp. When was the last time he broke the line?

User avatar
851
Member
Member
Posts: 6369
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 6:38 pm

Post by 851 » Sat 11 Nov, 2017 9:33 pm

WestsBenTigers wrote:
Sat 11 Nov, 2017 8:59 pm
851 wrote:
Sat 11 Nov, 2017 8:57 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 11 Nov, 2017 7:24 pm
will1999 wrote:
Mon 06 Nov, 2017 1:06 am
1. Hopoate
6. Foran
7. Mbye
9. Lichea/ JMK
And some say our spine looks bad.
Hoppa at 1 has better form than Tui
Foran is better than Reynolds
Mbye and Brooks a dead heat
Liccha without Des's boring game plan is better than Liddle.
So not a great argument
You have got to be kidding

Are you a dogs supporter or an anti-tigers supporter
Tell me where I am wrong, and I have supported wests/weststigers for almost 50 years
Go hard or go home

Post Reply