Nathan Cleary

bathursttiger
Member
Member
Posts: 1783
Joined: Thu 02 Dec, 2010 5:21 pm

Re: Nathan Cleary

Post by bathursttiger » Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:57 am

TopTiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:48 am
bathursttiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:31 am
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.
Me thinks not!!
Me hopes so!!!!


TigerTiger
Member
Member
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue 13 Jun, 2017 4:56 pm

Post by TigerTiger » Thu 23 Nov, 2017 12:26 pm

I don't see it as a coincidence Brooks was only signed for 2 years. Not at all. Less to payout if Brooks doesn't step up. We can then pressure Penrith to get Cleary early. Worked with Moylan, Moylan's five year deal didn't even last 1 year, though hopefully Cleary has more integrity than Moylan. Moylan's tantrums reminded me too much of Moses.

Personally I hope col is right and Brooks stays as a 5/8, Reynolds to hooker, and we nab Cleary as 1/2. That would be something!

bathursttiger
Member
Member
Posts: 1783
Joined: Thu 02 Dec, 2010 5:21 pm

Post by bathursttiger » Thu 23 Nov, 2017 4:31 pm

TigerTiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 12:26 pm
I don't see it as a coincidence Brooks was only signed for 2 years. Not at all. Less to payout if Brooks doesn't step up. We can then pressure Penrith to get Cleary early. Worked with Moylan, Moylan's five year deal didn't even last 1 year, though hopefully Cleary has more integrity than Moylan. Moylan's tantrums reminded me too much of Moses.

Personally I hope col is right and Brooks stays as a 5/8, Reynolds to hooker, and we nab Cleary as 1/2. That would be something!
I don't think Nathan is going to be the same sort of grub that Moylan was.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:28 pm

bathursttiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:31 am
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.
I'm going to say yes. The plan was to always splinter the contracts of Brooks, Moses, Woods and Tedesco, and not have them all coming off contract at the same time again. Brooks was always going to get the shortest offer out of the 4.

On Cleary's comments about Nathan, I wouldn't be surprised if they were partly a tactical ploy to stick a rocket up Brooks. It's got to be embarrassing for him that his coach is talking about a potential replacement for him, two years down the track. Let's see how he responds.

Snake
Member
Member
Posts: 4338
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 5:37 pm

Post by Snake » Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:48 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:28 pm
bathursttiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:31 am
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.
I'm going to say yes. The plan was to always splinter the contracts of Brooks, Moses, Woods and Tedesco, and not have them all coming off contract at the same time again. Brooks was always going to get the shortest offer out of the 4.

On Cleary's comments about Nathan, I wouldn't be surprised if they were partly a tactical ploy to stick a rocket up Brooks. It's got to be embarrassing for him that his coach is talking about a potential replacement for him, two years down the track. Let's see how he responds.
Brooks has to respond in a big way or I see by mid season someone from the lower grades in the 7 ..I do not think Brooks will be at the club come 2019 has already peaked.


tiger05premier
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 452
Joined: Tue 11 Mar, 2014 6:26 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by tiger05premier » Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:54 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:28 pm
bathursttiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:31 am
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.
I'm going to say yes. The plan was to always splinter the contracts of Brooks, Moses, Woods and Tedesco, and not have them all coming off contract at the same time again. Brooks was always going to get the shortest offer out of the 4.

On Cleary's comments about Nathan, I wouldn't be surprised if they were partly a tactical ploy to stick a rocket up Brooks. It's got to be embarrassing for him that his coach is talking about a potential replacement for him, two years down the track. Let's see how he responds.
Plus help Nathan get the best deal possible from Penrith if that's where he wants to stay

User avatar
sideline eye
Member
Member
Posts: 853
Joined: Fri 07 Mar, 2014 5:42 pm

Post by sideline eye » Thu 23 Nov, 2017 10:31 pm

bathursttiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:31 am
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.
Oh, Bathurst, how could you even think such a thing?!!!!

Donald Trump
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 15 Nov, 2016 5:28 pm

Post by Donald Trump » Fri 24 Nov, 2017 10:22 pm

Snake wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:48 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:28 pm
bathursttiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:31 am
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.
I'm going to say yes. The plan was to always splinter the contracts of Brooks, Moses, Woods and Tedesco, and not have them all coming off contract at the same time again. Brooks was always going to get the shortest offer out of the 4.

On Cleary's comments about Nathan, I wouldn't be surprised if they were partly a tactical ploy to stick a rocket up Brooks. It's got to be embarrassing for him that his coach is talking about a potential replacement for him, two years down the track. Let's see how he responds.
Brooks has to respond in a big way or I see by mid season someone from the lower grades in the 7 ..I do not think Brooks will be at the club come 2019 has already peaked.
X 2. Benji will be our no.7 by round 7
Let's make the Tigers great again!

Russell
Member
Member
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat 10 Dec, 2011 6:46 pm

Post by Russell » Sat 25 Nov, 2017 9:25 am

Donald Trump wrote:
Fri 24 Nov, 2017 10:22 pm
Snake wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:48 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:28 pm
bathursttiger wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 11:31 am
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.
I'm going to say yes. The plan was to always splinter the contracts of Brooks, Moses, Woods and Tedesco, and not have them all coming off contract at the same time again. Brooks was always going to get the shortest offer out of the 4.

On Cleary's comments about Nathan, I wouldn't be surprised if they were partly a tactical ploy to stick a rocket up Brooks. It's got to be embarrassing for him that his coach is talking about a potential replacement for him, two years down the track. Let's see how he responds.
Brooks has to respond in a big way or I see by mid season someone from the lower grades in the 7 ..I do not think Brooks will be at the club come 2019 has already peaked.
X 2. Benji will be our no.7 by round 7
Wrong! again.

hobbo
Member
Member
Posts: 7111
Joined: Mon 10 Mar, 2014 5:03 pm

Post by hobbo » Sat 25 Nov, 2017 9:37 am

Russell wrote:
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 9:25 am
Donald Trump wrote:
Fri 24 Nov, 2017 10:22 pm
Snake wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:48 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:28 pm

I'm going to say yes. The plan was to always splinter the contracts of Brooks, Moses, Woods and Tedesco, and not have them all coming off contract at the same time again. Brooks was always going to get the shortest offer out of the 4.

On Cleary's comments about Nathan, I wouldn't be surprised if they were partly a tactical ploy to stick a rocket up Brooks. It's got to be embarrassing for him that his coach is talking about a potential replacement for him, two years down the track. Let's see how he responds.
Brooks has to respond in a big way or I see by mid season someone from the lower grades in the 7 ..I do not think Brooks will be at the club come 2019 has already peaked.
X 2. Benji will be our no.7 by round 7
Wrong! again.
Reynolds ?
EPL 2014/15 Predict 6
Competition ...CHAMPION !
Winner of the 2016 $$$$
Work tipping comp !

User avatar
innsaneink
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 25558
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Sat 25 Nov, 2017 10:23 am

Jesus how can you be wrong on something that hasnt happened yet... and may not at all

Russell
Member
Member
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat 10 Dec, 2011 6:46 pm

Post by Russell » Sat 25 Nov, 2017 1:15 pm

innsaneink wrote:
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 10:23 am
Jesus how can you be wrong on something that hasnt happened yet... and may not at all
The same as you can't be right about something that hasn't happened yet.... and may not at all. Lol

User avatar
barra
Member
Member
Posts: 2055
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: Sth Coast

Post by barra » Sat 25 Nov, 2017 1:46 pm

As a Wests Tigers fan, I hope like hell that Nathan Cleary does come to the club, form a record-breaking combination with his old man, and delivery us multiple titles.

And as a Wests Tigers fan, I shake in my boots fearing it will all end in tears! :bawling

Donald Trump
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 15 Nov, 2016 5:28 pm

Post by Donald Trump » Sat 25 Nov, 2017 11:07 pm

Maybe we should have Brooks and Marshall? Their win rate is 100%!
Let's make the Tigers great again!

Donald Trump
Member
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue 15 Nov, 2016 5:28 pm

Post by Donald Trump » Sat 25 Nov, 2017 11:08 pm

Russell wrote:
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 9:25 am
Donald Trump wrote:
Fri 24 Nov, 2017 10:22 pm
Snake wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:48 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:28 pm

I'm going to say yes. The plan was to always splinter the contracts of Brooks, Moses, Woods and Tedesco, and not have them all coming off contract at the same time again. Brooks was always going to get the shortest offer out of the 4.

On Cleary's comments about Nathan, I wouldn't be surprised if they were partly a tactical ploy to stick a rocket up Brooks. It's got to be embarrassing for him that his coach is talking about a potential replacement for him, two years down the track. Let's see how he responds.
Brooks has to respond in a big way or I see by mid season someone from the lower grades in the 7 ..I do not think Brooks will be at the club come 2019 has already peaked.
X 2. Benji will be our no.7 by round 7
Wrong! again.
Knob! again
Let's make the Tigers great again!

formerguest
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 3314
Joined: Fri 07 Jun, 2013 7:33 pm

Post by formerguest » Sat 25 Nov, 2017 11:32 pm

Donald Trump wrote:
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 11:07 pm
Maybe we should have Brooks and Marshall? Their win rate is 100%!
I don't see Benji playing as a centre on a regular basis, if at all.

goldcoast tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5534
Joined: Sat 12 Apr, 2014 5:42 pm

Post by goldcoast tiger » Sun 26 Nov, 2017 7:07 am

formerguest wrote:
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 11:32 pm
Donald Trump wrote:
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 11:07 pm
Maybe we should have Brooks and Marshall? Their win rate is 100%!
I don't see Benji playing as a centre on a regular basis, if at all.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he plays quite a few.
I’m happy to see him back and he seems to have learnt to tone down some of the Hail Mary stuff a bit.
My only fear is that Benjii and Reynolds both have their brain explosions in the same games.
And at the same times.
The chances of that areforever hanging there.

Russell
Member
Member
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat 10 Dec, 2011 6:46 pm

Post by Russell » Sun 26 Nov, 2017 9:10 am

Donald Trump wrote:
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 11:08 pm
Russell wrote:
Sat 25 Nov, 2017 9:25 am
Donald Trump wrote:
Fri 24 Nov, 2017 10:22 pm
Snake wrote:
Thu 23 Nov, 2017 5:48 pm

Brooks has to respond in a big way or I see by mid season someone from the lower grades in the 7 ..I do not think Brooks will be at the club come 2019 has already peaked.
X 2. Benji will be our no.7 by round 7
Wrong! again.
Knob! again
I can see your mental capabilities are as strong as your name sake.

Name calling is the lowest of answers - maybe if you think for a few months you may have a real answer.

Post Reply
cron