Pick the score

ImageImageImage
InBenjiWeTrust
Member
Member
Posts: 2070
Joined: Mon 12 Mar, 2012 2:59 pm

Re: Pick the score

Post by InBenjiWeTrust » Thu 15 Aug, 2013 1:01 pm

WT win by 1 point, Anasta's field goal :)

Go Tigers :sign:


Knuckles
Member
Member
Posts: 2803
Joined: Wed 15 Jul, 2009 10:11 am

Post by Knuckles » Thu 15 Aug, 2013 1:11 pm

I seem to remember the Bears getting 28.5 from Brisbane in the early 90's
Either way its a hell of a start

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 40769
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm

Post by happy tiger » Thu 15 Aug, 2013 6:45 pm

Well if we are going to cover the 26.5 we have to hold them 26

Tell him he's dreamin

Take the $8 that we will get held to 0

User avatar
underdog
Member
Member
Posts: 5324
Joined: Tue 27 Apr, 2010 5:25 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post by underdog » Thu 15 Aug, 2013 6:57 pm

Tigers 1-12.
Marshall to find form again
Tigers to mount a comeback off the back of up in your face defense.
Anasta proves to be the difference

...


SAID NO ONE EVER.


...


Roosters by a heap.
Image

Lovemytigers
Member
Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu 16 Feb, 2012 5:33 pm

Post by Lovemytigers » Thu 15 Aug, 2013 9:25 pm

22 - 8 Tigers.

Because I can never, ever bet against them....too much Tiger DNA I guess.


User avatar
piquet339
Member
Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed 03 Oct, 2012 12:43 pm

Post by piquet339 » Fri 16 Aug, 2013 9:58 am

Tigers paying $11 head-to-head. Is anyone game enough to take that? Had got to be close to a record for a two horse race...
"Everyone is a genius at least once a year; a real genius has his original ideas closer together."
- Georg Lichtenberg (1742-1799)

User avatar
bigsiro
Member
Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Tue 11 Jan, 2011 10:50 pm

Post by bigsiro » Fri 16 Aug, 2013 11:05 am

piquet339 wrote:Tigers paying $11 head-to-head. Is anyone game enough to take that? Had got to be close to a record for a two horse race...
Unbelievable. A qualifier vs Djokovic in the first round gets shorter odds!

Then again, no-one gave Liverpool a hope against Milan in 2005 Champions League Final.
Statistically, Milan hadn't lost a game all year in games where they scored the first goal. Against Liverpool they scored the first 3 goals.
Liverpool won.
That was the same year the Tigers won the Grand Final.

I believe in miracles.

Tigers by 8.
Make Wests Tigers Great Again

Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 5470
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm

Post by Fade To Black » Fri 16 Aug, 2013 8:21 pm

Roosters 58
Tiges 4

But Marshall and co will come out after the game and say that "we were well in the game".

Mitchell Pearce will get MOTM. He plays like a busted gonad week in and week out, year after year but pretty much always tears WT to shreds.

User avatar
sheer64
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 5610
Joined: Sun 23 Sep, 2012 2:06 pm

Post by sheer64 » Fri 16 Aug, 2013 11:11 pm

Tigers 19 Rooters 18

That's the penalty count

and the score

Rooters 34 Tigers 14
Arise Sir Waste Anasta, Tool of the highest order!

User avatar
TJL
Member
Member
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon 13 May, 2013 9:25 pm
Location: West Australia

Post by TJL » Sun 18 Aug, 2013 4:40 am

If the Rooters don't put 80 on the mob we have they have become too tired from catching the kickoff and running to the tryline and back.

User avatar
TIGER
Member
Member
Posts: 3487
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 10:40 am

Post by TIGER » Sun 18 Aug, 2013 9:45 am

$11 head to head is an insult to the roosters. If we were $200/1 I still wouldn't waste a buck on us. Thinking about having a bet on us remaining scoreless.

Gray
Member
Member
Posts: 523
Joined: Sun 18 Mar, 2012 5:20 pm

Post by Gray » Sun 18 Aug, 2013 9:58 am

TIGER wrote:$11 head to head is an insult to the roosters. If we were $200/1 I still wouldn't waste a buck on us. Thinking about having a bet on us remaining scoreless.
I wish we could in NZ too! But our TAB is horrible. I'd definitely be on that, them keeping us to nil that is.

Posted using RoarFEED 2013

Knuckles
Member
Member
Posts: 2803
Joined: Wed 15 Jul, 2009 10:11 am

Post by Knuckles » Sun 18 Aug, 2013 10:06 am

The only hope we have is complacency. They did let the raiders back into it last week and they didn't exactly prove the form yesterday. Expect the worst and hope for the best.
Sometimes the Tiges do better when they are massive underdogs than when they are favourites.

User avatar
smeghead
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9454
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 11:56 pm

Post by smeghead » Mon 19 Aug, 2013 10:17 am

I was tempted to go, watch the NYC and head home but scheduling means I won't be doing that
Image

User avatar
cunno
Member
Member
Posts: 4389
Joined: Wed 28 Jul, 2010 7:42 pm

Post by cunno » Mon 19 Aug, 2013 10:56 am

Wests Tigers 32 Rorters 18 but that's in the U20's. First Grade um well it depends on whether the rorters take us easy and clock off, whether SBW injures himself early, whether Pearce has a shocker, whether BMM target Maloney on the goal line, whether Benji is wearing a blues jersey under his WTs jersey, whether Ayshford commits this week and I could go on but after all the ifs and buts Wests Tigers by 2 in a miracle.

Newtown
Member
Member
Posts: 5615
Joined: Fri 28 Sep, 2012 8:40 am

Post by Newtown » Mon 19 Aug, 2013 10:58 am

happy tiger wrote:Roosters 52 Tigers 0 and we will be lucky if we hold them to that
We would be lucky if they hold us to nil? Seriously I sense an upset.

User avatar
ragedmachine
Member
Member
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 1:13 pm

Post by ragedmachine » Mon 19 Aug, 2013 12:15 pm

Roosters 56-4

The right side defense will be exploited and terrorized by Jennings all night with Ayshford coming out of the line and missing a boatload of tackles.

Potter to say we were well in it for the first 30min, and that he was proud of the effort by the boys, but to face the minor premiership contenders with an inexperienced squad, it was difficult to stay in the game.

Marshall to look depressed at the presser once again and also denying that all the off-field issues had any hand in his dip in form and that he is trying his best for the Tigers.











Potter to pick the same lineup again next week against the Dragons...

User avatar
smeghead
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9454
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 11:56 pm

Post by smeghead » Mon 19 Aug, 2013 12:41 pm

Good news everyone.

Seems Luke O'Donnell is back for the Chooks
Image

Post Reply