can't believe our odds for Friday

User avatar
foreveratiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 11538
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

can't believe our odds for Friday

Unread post by foreveratiger » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 8:30 am

I am absolutely astounded by the odds for Friday night, Tigers are $3.35 to beat the Rabbits and Rabbits are paying $1.30 to beat us, that is a total lack of respect I reckon, they are missing Inglis, Teo, Mcqueen, Walker while the Tigers missing Farah and Woods.
We have beaten them already I know we miss Farah a lot when he doesn't play but $3.35 is insulting, put those odd's on the dressing sheds before we run out.
I'll definitely be putting some money on those odds
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.


User avatar
innsaneink
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 25335
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 224 times

Unread post by innsaneink » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 8:39 am

Are you offended?

I really dont get the long odds = lack of respect angle (well I do, its a hook)

Bookies set them, weight of money determines the fluctuations.

They got you

User avatar
foreveratiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 11538
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

Unread post by foreveratiger » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 8:46 am

[quote="innsaneink"]Are you offended?

I really dont get the long odds = lack of respect angle (well I do, its a hook)

Bookies set them, weight of money determines the fluctuations.

They got you[/quote
I understand how it all works I'm a punter.
Those odd's are basically saying we have sweet F all chance of winning.
Well if bookies did think we were a chance they definitely wouldn't be paying $3.35
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.

Newtown
Member
Member
Posts: 5201
Joined: Fri 28 Sep, 2012 8:40 am
Been liked: 1 time

Unread post by Newtown » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 8:55 am

innsaneink wrote:Are you offended?

I really dont get the long odds = lack of respect angle (well I do, its a hook)

Bookies set them, weight of money determines the fluctuations.

They got you
If they are offering $3.50 head to head I would think what they offer on line (start) betting would be good value.

User avatar
simonthetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 3370
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:12 pm

Unread post by simonthetiger » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 8:56 am

I got on at 3.70 last time we played them..our odds have been good this year...was happy with the 2 dollars last week too.

Stop complaining and have a dash...


User avatar
Lakra
Member
Member
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed 09 Apr, 2014 11:11 pm
Been liked: 1 time

Unread post by Lakra » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 9:03 am

i like being written off. If we lose its expected, but if we win its a shock and we're seen as competition.

User avatar
foreveratiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 11538
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

Unread post by foreveratiger » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 9:07 am

simonthetiger wrote:I got on at 3.70 last time we played them..our odds have been good this year...was happy with the 2 dollars last week too.

Stop complaining and have a dash...
I'm not complaining mate, just think we are better than $3.35, as a punter my mouth was salivating
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.

User avatar
Basil Tiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 559
Joined: Tue 18 Sep, 2012 10:35 am
Location: Northern NSW(ex-Sydney).
Been liked: 3 times

Unread post by Basil Tiger » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 9:43 am

Yeah,Souths are yet to reach last seasons form IMO so are beatable if the Pommy connection has an off night.
Greetings All,from far Northern NSW.

User avatar
innsaneink
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 25335
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 224 times

Unread post by innsaneink » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 9:53 am

Yeah and I think our form minus Farah & Woods (we cannot score points) have been taken into account when framing the market

I just dont get the respect or lack of bit...its punting....each to their own

User avatar
quintus
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 10:17 am
Been liked: 4 times

Unread post by quintus » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 10:02 am

Any opinions on who are the best people to lay a bet with....

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 18805
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 203 times

Unread post by GNR4LIFE » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 10:31 am

Why you complaining? just take their money.

User avatar
simonthetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 3370
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:12 pm

Unread post by simonthetiger » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 12:09 pm

I have a healthy Centrebet account thanks to the tigers this year,

We payed 2 dollars against Cronulla and the Knights, and Parra....and over 3 bucks against Souffs and The GC earlier in the year.

We keep getting understimated and I get more money to lose later in the year...everyone is happy.

User avatar
simonthetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 3370
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:12 pm

Unread post by simonthetiger » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 12:11 pm

I think about 2.75 is right......Souffs are faves and rightly so.

Without Robbie and Woodsy we are so so.

Re the undermanned Broncs game.

User avatar
jirskyr
Member
Member
Posts: 4891
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:00 pm
Has liked: 122 times
Been liked: 132 times

Unread post by jirskyr » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 12:47 pm

I got on Tigers last Friday at $4.00, putting on my bets for last week I thought it was a good offer a week out. I always knew both sides would be down on troops, plus thought Souths might cop some physical abuse from Warriors.

I had them at $4.25 in the Round 3 win, best bet all year.

User avatar
foreveratiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 11538
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

Unread post by foreveratiger » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 3:16 pm

jirskyr wrote:I got on Tigers last Friday at $4.00, putting on my bets for last week I thought it was a good offer a week out. I always knew both sides would be down on troops, plus thought Souths might cop some physical abuse from Warriors.

I had them at $4.25 in the Round 3 win, best bet all year.
yeah agree , great value for money
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.

tig_prmz
Member
Member
Posts: 7912
Joined: Sat 03 Oct, 2009 10:32 pm
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 20 times

Unread post by tig_prmz » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 3:21 pm

i get why tigers should feel offended tbh. we're in the 8, we're playing good footy. talented youngsters with a few old heads. respect is not asked for, it's earned.. for some reason even though we are playing good footy, we're playing within the rules- i dont feel like we've earnt the respect of the opposition.

hope this changes soon.
My Round 1 Team 2018

1. lolo 2. noffa 3. suli 4. milne 5. fonua
6. reynolds 7. brooks
8. packer 9. ET 10. Twal
11. McQuen 12. Lawrence 13. Eiso
14. Matulino 15. McIllwrick 16. Sue 17. Aloiai
18. Marsters 19. Benji 20. Grant 21. K Naiqama
Next: Liddle, MCK, Felise, MWZ, Thompson, Rochow, Gamble

Goose
Member
Member
Posts: 4633
Joined: Tue 21 Sep, 2010 2:46 pm
Location: Concord

Unread post by Goose » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 3:51 pm

There is a guy who has $1000 on the longest price head to head option each round and apparently he beats the TAB every year.

User avatar
pHyR3
Member
Member
Posts: 5030
Joined: Tue 12 Feb, 2013 7:11 pm

Unread post by pHyR3 » Wed 11 Jun, 2014 4:07 pm

Goose wrote:There is a guy who has $1000 on the longest price head to head option each round and apparently he beats the TAB every year.
taken from when i used to bet on the NFL, a rule i used was if a side is offered a 10.5 start or greater they usually cover it.

or put more simply, teams with long odds usually do better than expected (maybe not wining it but still).
''Everybody talks about their four brothers, we have 17 here so we don't really care about them."

Post Reply

Return to “Round 14: Wests Tigers vs South Sydney Rabbitohs”