Targeting Tedesco pointless: McCrone

User avatar
willow
Member
Member
Posts: 30424
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: Perth
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 84 times

Targeting Tedesco pointless: McCrone

Unread post by willow » Thu 26 Jun, 2014 4:13 pm

Targeting Tedesco pointless: McCrone

By Matt Encarnacion and Dan Walsh
NRL.com
11:26am Thu 26th June, 2014

Canberra halfback Josh McCrone says targeting Wests Tigers fullback James Tedesco this week will be pure folly for his teammates.

"He's not going to help us hold onto the football. It's not too much of a focus for us," McCrone told NRL.com this week.

Saturday night's clash against the Raiders will be the first time Tedesco meets the team that he backflipped on last month, reneging on a lucrative four-year deal that would have made him the franchise face of the club.

And while Raiders players might have privately been fuming about the snub, if the 21-year-old performs anything like he did against Newcastle three weeks ago, seeking revenge could blow up in their faces.

"He was impressive that game he had against the Knights. I had a bit of a look at it. So hopefully he doesn't perform to that standard because he's a quality player," McCrone continued.

"He's fortunate enough to stay at the Tigers and he's playing with his mates. I won't be surprised if he has a big game."

Tigers prop Keith Galloway said his teammate was fortunate the grudge match would be played in his home town of Campbelltown, as opposed to the chilling reception he would've met in Canberra.

"I think he'll be right. It's another game of footy, it's our home game. We're not playing in Canberra in front of their home crowd where he's going to be booed by the whole crowd," Galloway said.

"He's proven the calibre of player he is. I don't think he has to prove anything. Obviously the press will be talking about it, but it's our home game."

Teammate Curtis Sironen said the side's morale had lifted since Tedesco reneged on the deal, adding he believed the Raiders would target Tedesco regardless.

"When you've got a quality player in the side anyway, they're going to try and give him a bit anyway just to throw him off his game. I don't think they'll give him any more than they would. Teddy will be alright. He's a big boy," he said.

"Teddy moving to Canberra, it would've been hard, one of your good mates moving away. We weren't happy about it.

"But for him staying, team morale, when he made the decision, we were all up. We went into the Newcastle game, we can tell there was a bit of excitement. It was disappointing [against the Rabbitohs] but hopefully we can get that going again. He's here now so we'll make the most of it."

Meanwhile, as veteran Liam Fulton deliberates on his long-term future in the game, the club has been boosted by the progress of utility Tim Moltzen.

The 25-year-old began training with the team last week and while he is still a few weeks away from contact, his return to the paddock is a positive sign in his recovery.

"He's had it tough for a while. He's bounced back from injuries and he's back out with the team. So he's a really good bloke and he deserves all the luck he can get from here on. It's good to see," Galloway said.

"It's obviously a good sign that he's running around. Obviously there's a process where he's got to tick a heap of boxes, but he's taken a few steps now, so it's really good."


User avatar
Masterton
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 2121
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 6:57 pm
Has liked: 47 times
Been liked: 36 times

Unread post by Masterton » Thu 26 Jun, 2014 8:34 pm

My arse they won't target him. Every backline movement, they'll be looking out for him if they have any brains.

And am I the only person secretly hoping the return of Moltz could be the demise of Anasta? Maybe.
"I was on the bus before you painted it yellow."

Nors05
Member
Member
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu 13 Mar, 2014 9:21 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Unread post by Nors05 » Fri 27 Jun, 2014 12:41 pm

We need to play this to our advantage. Use Teddy to draw in defenders...just if Brooks was playing on the right side of the field...Brooks/Tedesco/Simona/Nofo TRY A FUCKING THON

User avatar
Tigerdon
Member
Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon 07 Apr, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Manly
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 100 times

Unread post by Tigerdon » Fri 27 Jun, 2014 11:22 pm

Good call, Nors05. Totally agree. If the Raiders get distracted by trying to smash Teddy.. Our outside backs hopefully will have room to run riot.
Ivan "Billy Beane from Moneyball" Cleary!
It's the Ivan of the tiger, It's the thrill of the fight...

User avatar
pHyR3
Member
Member
Posts: 5030
Joined: Tue 12 Feb, 2013 7:11 pm

Unread post by pHyR3 » Fri 27 Jun, 2014 11:46 pm

listen to potter's interview VERY carefully this week.

i have a feeling we are gonna make a massive run at the finals, he hinted at using both sides to their potential. which means he knows brooks has been playing primarily left side and our right is very underutilised. secondly he talked about moses and hinted he may play later this year.

putting those together, if we have a 1st, 2nd receiver combo (from the bench) of brooks and moses switching sides at will they will wreak havoc.

just a thought, hope it doesn't happen this week though. dont want to give our secret away too soon ;)
''Everybody talks about their four brothers, we have 17 here so we don't really care about them."


User avatar
Tigerdon
Member
Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon 07 Apr, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Manly
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 100 times

Unread post by Tigerdon » Sat 28 Jun, 2014 12:19 am

I take it you're referring to the Potter interview on the West Tigers website.
Potter seemed far from happy with the backline in that interview.
Ivan "Billy Beane from Moneyball" Cleary!
It's the Ivan of the tiger, It's the thrill of the fight...

User avatar
VanillaThunder
Member
Member
Posts: 952
Joined: Mon 18 Jul, 2011 12:57 am
Location: Perth, WA
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 15 times

Unread post by VanillaThunder » Sat 28 Jun, 2014 12:54 am

Gotta love Mick's response right at the end. Reporter asks what sort of time frame we're looking at for Moses' debut, this year or next year, and Potter comes back with a stone-faced "Yes."
But back on topic, does sound like we're going to see a bit more ball to Nofo and Simona, and hopefully a lot less Braith.

Posted using RoarFEED V.4

User avatar
greatodensraven
Member
Member
Posts: 1962
Joined: Sat 15 Dec, 2012 7:11 pm
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 23 times

Unread post by greatodensraven » Sat 28 Jun, 2014 9:08 am

Hopefully our pack will dominate first. Teddy has been back for a couple of weeks now so I'll be looking for his combination with brooks & farah to cut loose today.

Posted using RoarFEED V.4

User avatar
pHyR3
Member
Member
Posts: 5030
Joined: Tue 12 Feb, 2013 7:11 pm

Unread post by pHyR3 » Sat 28 Jun, 2014 9:35 am

Tigerdon wrote:I take it you're referring to the Potter interview on the West Tigers website.
Potter seemed far from happy with the backline in that interview.
i dont think he was either happy or unhappy, he just seemed as though he acknowledged we weren't using everyone to their full potential. (which clearly would involve brooks only going left)
''Everybody talks about their four brothers, we have 17 here so we don't really care about them."

Post Reply

Return to “Round 16: Wests Tigers vs Canberra Raiders”