Bulldogs Kicked a Field Goal On Tackle 7

Tony33
Member
Member
Posts: 1235
Joined: Tue 18 Mar, 2014 5:21 pm

Bulldogs Kicked a Field Goal On Tackle 7

Post by Tony33 » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:08 pm

Triple M reporting that Bulldogs kicked their field goal on a 7th tackle

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
2015 - The Year The Dynasty Began...


User avatar
willow
Member
Member
Posts: 33160
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: The Village

Post by willow » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:09 pm

Geez there will be a blow up if that is the case.

User avatar
Sabre
Member
Member
Posts: 6958
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:06 pm
Location: Tiger Town

Post by Sabre » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:10 pm

Surely if it is the result can be made a draw?

Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.2.3

User avatar
foreveratiger
Member
Member
Posts: 12039
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

Post by foreveratiger » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:11 pm

I seriously hate Extra Time .
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.

User avatar
Flippedy
Member
Member
Posts: 7913
Joined: Mon 19 Oct, 2009 10:58 pm
Location: Central Coast NSW

Post by Flippedy » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:12 pm

Would they actually change the result if found to be true? We live in hope!
Sooner or later, next year has to be this year - Ricksen


User avatar
willow
Member
Member
Posts: 33160
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: The Village

Post by willow » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:13 pm

They didn't change the result for the Cowboys the other year.

User avatar
Milky
Member
Member
Posts: 5343
Joined: Fri 29 Mar, 2013 7:08 pm

Post by Milky » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:14 pm

Won't be changed. These reffs are shocking.

Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.2.3

hobbo
Member
Member
Posts: 10196
Joined: Mon 10 Mar, 2014 5:03 pm

Post by hobbo » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:15 pm

foreveratiger wrote:I seriously hate Extra Time .
We deserved 1 point .

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
We need mongrel ..
No more plodders !

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 41466
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
Location: Watching Waiting Lurking

Post by happy tiger » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:15 pm

Usually something like that stands out

I'm calling BS , they had two tackles left from thirty odd out

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22828
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:18 pm

It was 7. Was that after Brooks shot? I counted 7 and assumed we must have touched it something, impossible as that was

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22828
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:19 pm

it was 7. Was that after Brooks shot? I counted 7 and assumed we must have touched it or something, impossible as that was

BlackandGoldForever
Member
Member
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed 19 Mar, 2014 12:39 pm

Post by BlackandGoldForever » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:22 pm

that's funny I learnt how to count to 6 when I was 4

User avatar
Milky
Member
Member
Posts: 5343
Joined: Fri 29 Mar, 2013 7:08 pm

Post by Milky » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:23 pm

it was 7, some crap about unintentional offside...

Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.2.3

BlackandGoldForever
Member
Member
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed 19 Mar, 2014 12:39 pm

Post by BlackandGoldForever » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:24 pm

willow wrote:They didn't change the result for the Cowboys the other year.
completely different situation it happened in the 1st half and it cant be 100% that it costed them the game

User avatar
willow
Member
Member
Posts: 33160
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: The Village

Post by willow » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:28 pm

BlackandGoldForever wrote:
willow wrote:They didn't change the result for the Cowboys the other year.
completely different situation it happened in the 1st half and it cant be 100% that it costed them the game
Still don't think it will change the result, as much as we did deserve 1 point.

tsjonathan
Member
Member
Posts: 1963
Joined: Sun 21 Mar, 2010 6:04 pm

Post by tsjonathan » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:29 pm

Was this the set that was kicked from a tiger to another tigers back? If so it's a 7 tackle set, whereby the dogs start from 0. IF that was the set. I can't recall properly though.

formerguest
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 4130
Joined: Fri 07 Jun, 2013 7:33 pm

Post by formerguest » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:35 pm

tsjonathan wrote:Was this the set that was kicked from a tiger to another tigers back? If so it's a 7 tackle set, whereby the dogs start from 0. IF that was the set. I can't recall properly though.
It would be accidental offside would it not, thus should have been a scrum?

Tony33
Member
Member
Posts: 1235
Joined: Tue 18 Mar, 2014 5:21 pm

Post by Tony33 » Fri 27 Mar, 2015 10:35 pm

They claimed it was for accidental offside but the rule back states in that case it should be a scrum or if there is an advantage then it's just play on. It should never be a 7 tackle set. That's coming from
Bill Harrogan.

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
2015 - The Year The Dynasty Began...

Post Reply