Brooks ruled out. Drinkwater to debut

User avatar
Cultured Bogan
Member
Member
Posts: 17826
Joined: Tue 15 Sep, 2009 11:20 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Re: Brooks ruled out. Drinkwater to debut

Post by Cultured Bogan » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 6:50 pm

You've missed Brooks' efforts this year I take it TYGA?
It's not cruelty to animals if you inject enough amphetamines.

Cuando llegue el día, y estoy parado a las puertas del cielo, será Dios pidiendo mi perdón...


User avatar
jirskyr
Member
Member
Posts: 5916
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:00 pm

Post by jirskyr » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 8:52 pm

Thanks Drinky, thanks for showing us there are worse attacking options than what we already thought we had. Rubbish grubber, forward pass, rubbish grubber, all in crucial attacking position.

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 28945
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 8:54 pm

Drinkwater drove me to drink

stevetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5111
Joined: Mon 25 Feb, 2013 7:59 am

Post by stevetiger » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 8:54 pm

jirskyr wrote:Thanks Drinky, thanks for showing us there are worse attacking options than what we already thought we had. Rubbish grubber, forward pass, rubbish grubber, all in crucial attacking position.
He was really poor. Brooks is a much better option based on that effort.

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 29193
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Perugia Italy..

Post by Geo. » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 8:59 pm

Moses wad good....

For someone who has had limited time with the team Quadja did some good bad and ugly...as a backup he's just that
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..


stevetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5111
Joined: Mon 25 Feb, 2013 7:59 am

Post by stevetiger » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 9:04 pm

Geo. wrote:Moses wad good....
He looks good doesn't he. I think he needs to be given more responsibility. Moses and Tedesco look the two most likely to win us games.

Teddy is miles ahead of him though.

User avatar
Love the WestsTigers
Member
Member
Posts: 3223
Joined: Wed 21 Jul, 2010 12:03 pm
Location: Ex Ctown Resident Now Qlander

Post by Love the WestsTigers » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 9:10 pm

I didnt think he was that bad
Some bad options ? Yes .. Expected in your first game in FG

MM on the other hand is growing as a player and IMO quicker than Brooks.
For a kid he can make some tackles really stick if he doesnt miss them
Credit to him

User avatar
851
Member
Member
Posts: 6241
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 6:38 pm

Post by 851 » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 9:53 pm

Love the WestsTigers wrote:I didnt think he was that bad
Some bad options ? Yes .. Expected in your first game in FG

MM on the other hand is growing as a player and IMO quicker than Brooks.
For a kid he can make some tackles really stick if he doesnt miss them
Credit to him
It was not his first game in the nrl, and he was ordinary
Go hard or go home

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 28945
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 9:55 pm

Fancy having to get approval to allow him to play....embarrasing

User avatar
Sabre
Member
Member
Posts: 6918
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:06 pm
Location: Tiger Town

Post by Sabre » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 9:58 pm

I think his combination with Cherrington was excellent.

Eye Of Da Tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 2020
Joined: Wed 16 Jan, 2013 10:49 pm

Post by Eye Of Da Tiger » Mon 06 Jul, 2015 10:12 pm

You can lead a hoarse to water but you can't make him Drinwater. Was very ordinary considering the opportunity he was given was a MUST to step up game. A career definining opportunity.

Did some ok things but nothing exciting.Brooks your job is safe.

Post Reply