Wests Tigers Team v Sharks

Magpie Magic
Member
Member
Posts: 1073
Joined: Mon 05 Apr, 2010 2:17 pm

Re: Wests Tigers Team v Sharks

Post by Magpie Magic » Tue 18 Aug, 2015 10:07 pm

Very happy they named this team and will be even happier if they start. This is as good as we can muster and gives a chance.
A good sign for " morale" that they want to play past niggles at this late stage.
Shame about late last year thought Potter deserved better.
This is a solid pack.
But the fact they are taking it so seriously is even better.


larrycorowa
Member
Member
Posts: 2094
Joined: Fri 19 Feb, 2010 1:47 pm

Post by larrycorowa » Wed 19 Aug, 2015 5:19 am

Lawrence in for Lovett and play Cherrington. Hopefully Woods and Dene are good to go.

formerguest
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 4051
Joined: Fri 07 Jun, 2013 7:33 pm

Post by formerguest » Wed 19 Aug, 2015 7:03 am

Magpie Magic wrote:Very happy they named this team and will be even happier if they start. This is as good as we can muster and gives a chance.
A good sign for " morale" that they want to play past niggles at this late stage.
Shame about late last year thought Potter deserved better.
This is a solid pack.
But the fact they are taking it so seriously is even better.
Yeah Potter was lucky to have seventeen fit players to choose from around this time last year, particularly in the backline, as we were playing a couple of backrowers and/or rookies in the three quarters, Moses getting his first starts as a half and of course no Teddy. The dollars injected into S&C seem to have made a big difference, yet we are further down the table.

User avatar
Tiger Watto
Member
Member
Posts: 10560
Joined: Mon 08 Mar, 2010 7:12 pm
Location: Maroochydore Qld

Post by Tiger Watto » Wed 19 Aug, 2015 7:09 am

This is ridiculous. Cant believe they didn't name my team???

Taylor's gotta go!

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
"Did someone buy you the internet hero play book for Christmas and you've only just started reading it?" - Nelson 21/04/2017

User avatar
jirskyr
Member
Member
Posts: 6038
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:00 pm

Post by jirskyr » Wed 19 Aug, 2015 12:05 pm

greatodensraven wrote:Marty off the bench is a no-brainer for me. We have been able to start well but as soon as the 20 min mark hits & our starting props go off we always lose touch with the opposition. Imagine being right in a game at 20 odd minutes & then being able to bring the Kapow into proceedings to terrorise the opposition! Instead of trying to hang on for the rest of the half we could actually continue the momentum & take advantage of his aggressive go-forward. His charging runs also lift the rest of the team when he comes on.

Really can't understand JTs decision to start Marty when he brings so much for impact for us off the bench. Especially now that our starting pack (Woods, Keith, Siro, Sue & lawrence) have been at least holding their own lately.
I don't get it either, he made all his good impact for the Kiwis off the bench.

Personally I don't think he has the motor yet to start the game consistently - first 20 mins are obviously the most intense and you need guys who pace themselves, to come back fresh enough after their breather. From my POV, Marty seems to go all-out for the first twenty, but is much less effective in his second stint.

The true beauty of Woods as a consistent prop performer is that he keeps his level up all game, so the intensity and involvement of his first 20 isn't really different to his last 20.


TrueTiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5473
Joined: Thu 14 Aug, 2014 11:22 am

Post by TrueTiger » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 1:46 pm

Tiger Watto wrote:This is ridiculous. Cant believe they didn't name my team???

Taylor's gotta go!

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
:bawling :rant :blah
You may see me struggle...but you will never see me quit... :D

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 29351
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Perugia Italy..

Post by Geo. » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 2:03 pm

Late Changes...

Lawrence starts ...Halatau to Lock

Bench
Lovett
Galloway
Seumanufagai
Taupau

Buchanan and Cherrington drop off extended bench
Wests Tigers don't need a Coach.. The playing group has taken over..

king sirro
Member
Member
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 9:39 am

Post by king sirro » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 2:12 pm

I love that move by Taylor.

Very happy to see Lawrence start. I like that backrow.
LAUGH NOW CRY LATER--JS

User avatar
Tiger Watto
Member
Member
Posts: 10560
Joined: Mon 08 Mar, 2010 7:12 pm
Location: Maroochydore Qld

Post by Tiger Watto » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 2:17 pm

Geo. wrote:Late Changes...

Lawrence starts ...Halatau to Lock

Bench
Lovett
Galloway
Seumanufagai
Taupau

Buchanan and Cherrington drop off extended bench
Good Bench

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
"Did someone buy you the internet hero play book for Christmas and you've only just started reading it?" - Nelson 21/04/2017

phil1986
Member
Member
Posts: 977
Joined: Tue 07 Aug, 2012 9:45 pm

Post by phil1986 » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 2:19 pm

Geo. wrote:Late Changes...

Lawrence starts ...Halatau to Lock

Bench
Lovett
Galloway
Seumanufagai
Taupau

Buchanan and Cherrington drop off extended bench
Best looking team all year.

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0

User avatar
willow
Member
Member
Posts: 33022
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: The Village

Post by willow » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 2:29 pm

Powerful bench, I like it. If we can get our completions up we should be too skilful for the Sharks.

User avatar
sheer64
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 5611
Joined: Sun 23 Sep, 2012 2:06 pm

Post by sheer64 » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 2:51 pm

willow wrote:Powerful bench, I like it. If we can get our completions up we should be too skilful for the Sharks.
I am not too sure, we will need to play really well to beat them which means Brooks needs to have a blinder.
Arise Sir Waste Anasta, Tool of the highest order!

User avatar
foreveratiger
Member
Member
Posts: 12035
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

Post by foreveratiger » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 2:59 pm

sheer64 wrote:
willow wrote:Powerful bench, I like it. If we can get our completions up we should be too skilful for the Sharks.
I am not too sure, we will need to play really well to beat them which means Brooks needs to have a blinder.
I'm still waiting for that blinder of a game , His Debut vs the Dragons was great .
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.

User avatar
cunno
Member
Member
Posts: 4389
Joined: Wed 28 Jul, 2010 7:42 pm

Post by cunno » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 3:51 pm

foreveratiger wrote:
sheer64 wrote:
willow wrote:Powerful bench, I like it. If we can get our completions up we should be too skilful for the Sharks.
I am not too sure, we will need to play really well to beat them which means Brooks needs to have a blinder.
I'm still waiting for that blinder of a game , His Debut vs the Dragons was great .
almost forgot it

User avatar
sheer64
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 5611
Joined: Sun 23 Sep, 2012 2:06 pm

Post by sheer64 » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 4:47 pm

foreveratiger wrote:
sheer64 wrote:
willow wrote:Powerful bench, I like it. If we can get our completions up we should be too skilful for the Sharks.
I am not too sure, we will need to play really well to beat them which means Brooks needs to have a blinder.
I'm still waiting for that blinder of a game , His Debut vs the Dragons was great .
Well I guess he did not have a blinder!
Arise Sir Waste Anasta, Tool of the highest order!

User avatar
foreveratiger
Member
Member
Posts: 12035
Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm

Post by foreveratiger » Sat 22 Aug, 2015 4:57 pm

sheer64 wrote:
foreveratiger wrote:
sheer64 wrote:
willow wrote:Powerful bench, I like it. If we can get our completions up we should be too skilful for the Sharks.
I am not too sure, we will need to play really well to beat them which means Brooks needs to have a blinder.
I'm still waiting for that blinder of a game , His Debut vs the Dragons was great .
Well I guess he did not have a blinder!
I'm so sick of all the lame excuses some put for him , his about to complete his 2nd full Season in 1st Grade and to me he just doesn't have it . Little pieces of brilliance here and there doesn't make him a complete 1st Grader......can't even tackle and i'm not talking on Emotion either .
It's a fact as much as some night deny it.
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.

Post Reply