What do you guy's think

Post Reply
tiger05premier
Member
Member
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue 11 Mar, 2014 6:26 pm
Location: Newcastle

What do you guy's think

Post by tiger05premier » Sun 24 Jul, 2016 5:12 pm

The NRL obviously doesn't like 12 v's 13. I am referring to Tim Grant. I just think the next best option if a send off isn't a option is that if a player is taken out illegally and cannot return and the player is penalised and put on report that player should be replaced and take no further part in the game. It's still 13 on 13 on the field but they are down a bench player as well. Thoughts?


User avatar
CocaCola
Member
Member
Posts: 461
Joined: Wed 23 Feb, 2011 3:06 pm

Post by CocaCola » Sun 24 Jul, 2016 6:35 pm

I would rather see an emergency player listed on the bench like the AFL, but he only replace an injured player in such circumstances as tonight.

User avatar
Kavi
Member
Member
Posts: 615
Joined: Mon 28 Apr, 2014 4:29 pm

Post by Kavi » Sun 24 Jul, 2016 6:43 pm

CocaCola wrote:I would rather see an emergency player listed on the bench like the AFL, but he only replace an injured player in such circumstances as tonight.
x2

GoldXR50Leroy
Member
Member
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue 31 May, 2011 3:36 pm

Post by GoldXR50Leroy » Sun 24 Jul, 2016 7:03 pm

Just make's this afternoon's win even greater!, an extra player on the bench means extra $$$ which unfortunately our club has little of..................

tiger05premier
Member
Member
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue 11 Mar, 2014 6:26 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by tiger05premier » Sun 24 Jul, 2016 7:15 pm

In my scenario there is no xtra player. They lose a player ti even it up due to an illegal play


EndlessPassion
Member
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue 01 Sep, 2009 11:10 am

Post by EndlessPassion » Sun 24 Jul, 2016 10:54 pm

Yes I agree player should be off, if the act is illegal of courae

PYMBLEPETE
Member
Member
Posts: 1033
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 9:15 pm

Post by PYMBLEPETE » Sun 24 Jul, 2016 11:07 pm

The offending player should be off also. Simple. And it may make some think twice, which would be good.

Today was a further example of what a ridiculous situation the NRL has itself in uunder current rules.

hobbo
Member
Member
Posts: 7997
Joined: Mon 10 Mar, 2014 5:03 pm

Post by hobbo » Sun 24 Jul, 2016 11:13 pm

PYMBLEPETE wrote:The offending player should be off also. Simple. And it may make some think twice, which would be good.

Today was a further example of what a ridiculous situation the NRL has itself in uunder current rules.
Agree ..... But it would be to complicated to rule if say a high shot was accidental .

What if Tedesco accidentally coat hangers a player and gets sent off ?
Vice President of the Michael Chee-Kam Fan Club .

Post Reply