Duel Badgers..

Spud Murphy
Member
Member
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sat 13 May, 2017 5:04 pm
Location: Third Heaven

Re: Duel Badgers..

Post by Spud Murphy » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 5:08 pm

Well they couldn't possibly do any worse than the twits we have controlling the games now, though i do worry if it ends up being Casey. Her eyesight must be pretty dodgy to marry Gav! I swear I thought she was his daughter when she first arrived on the scene :lol:


User avatar
Chicken Faced Killa
Member
Member
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon 17 Apr, 2017 8:19 pm

Post by Chicken Faced Killa » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 5:55 pm

That fact she would be on our game because it doesn't have an impact on the finals would be more to do with it being her first game rather than the fact she is a women. Anyone you debuts in round 26 isn't going to be given a game that could decide a teams fate it's a big step up

Spud Murphy
Member
Member
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sat 13 May, 2017 5:04 pm
Location: Third Heaven

Post by Spud Murphy » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 6:24 pm

Chicken Faced Killa wrote:
Sun 27 Aug, 2017 5:55 pm
That fact she would be on our game because it doesn't have an impact on the finals would be more to do with it being her first game rather than the fact she is a women. Anyone you debuts in round 26 isn't going to be given a game that could decide a teams fate it's a big step up
A womAn - why do people always have trouble writing and saying the word woman? Happens a lot and I have no idea why. We have no trouble saying man or men in the right context, but seem to be put off by the 'wo' for some reason. Not having a go at you, Chicken Faced Killa, it's just something I see more people do than not and I find it strange.

jadtiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 3277
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 8:12 am
Location: bayview

Post by jadtiger » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 6:52 pm

She couldnt be worse than her husband so i dont see any problem with it

User avatar
Sabre
Member
Member
Posts: 6918
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:06 pm
Location: Tiger Town

Post by Sabre » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 7:31 pm

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 27 Aug, 2017 12:40 pm
"The game has no bearing on the finals race".

Because we wouldn't want a woman in charge of a game that was. Just shows that it has nothing to do with giving a woman a game because she's earned it, rather just because she's a woman.
Yep 100%.
There are probably blokes reffing lower grades doing an outstanding job but they don't get the attention because they are just another guy in the line.
The fact they are saying either Sleeman or Badger shows they just want to pick a woman. I can't comment on either of their ability as a main ref, but from what I've seen in first grade neither stand out as great touchies. And as has already been said, Sleeman has one of the worst sideline calls the game has ever seen attached to her name.


User avatar
Chicken Faced Killa
Member
Member
Posts: 1897
Joined: Mon 17 Apr, 2017 8:19 pm

Post by Chicken Faced Killa » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 7:45 pm

Spud Murphy wrote:
Sun 27 Aug, 2017 6:24 pm
Chicken Faced Killa wrote:
Sun 27 Aug, 2017 5:55 pm
That fact she would be on our game because it doesn't have an impact on the finals would be more to do with it being her first game rather than the fact she is a women. Anyone you debuts in round 26 isn't going to be given a game that could decide a teams fate it's a big step up
A womAn - why do people always have trouble writing and saying the word woman? Happens a lot and I have no idea why. We have no trouble saying man or men in the right context, but seem to be put off by the 'wo' for some reason. Not having a go at you, Chicken Faced Killa, it's just something I see more people do than not and I find it strange.
Fair enough mate, an error on my part. wrote it quickly on my phone. Promise I will double check all grammar next time ;) :lol:

User avatar
chickenkebabs
Member
Member
Posts: 279
Joined: Thu 17 Feb, 2011 8:39 pm
Location: Narrabeen

Post by chickenkebabs » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 7:56 pm

Providing her husband has given her permission I don't see the problem with it.

Russell
Member
Member
Posts: 4969
Joined: Sat 10 Dec, 2011 6:46 pm

Post by Russell » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 7:57 pm

If she is as hopeless as Gavin...

Certainly would have to be a better ref than she is a touchie.

Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 5419
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm

Post by Fade To Black » Sun 27 Aug, 2017 10:03 pm

chickenkebabs wrote:
Sun 27 Aug, 2017 7:56 pm
Providing her husband has given her permission I don't see the problem with it.
Classic :roll

User avatar
Cultured Bogan
Member
Member
Posts: 17826
Joined: Tue 15 Sep, 2009 11:20 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Post by Cultured Bogan » Mon 28 Aug, 2017 9:13 am

I'm tipping she'll be twice the ref her husband is. He has lost the plot.
It's not cruelty to animals if you inject enough amphetamines.

Cuando llegue el día, y estoy parado a las puertas del cielo, será Dios pidiendo mi perdón...

User avatar
westTAHger
Member
Member
Posts: 4752
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: With the Groovy Ghoulies

Post by westTAHger » Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:15 pm

Why not let both the women, ref a game each. :idea:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..
Image
Basil, our rescue dog, is wondering when wests tigers will win 25 - 18 :D

User avatar
Harvey
Member
Member
Posts: 3623
Joined: Mon 22 Jun, 2015 10:01 pm
Location: Leumeah

Post by Harvey » Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:19 pm

westTAHger wrote:
Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:15 pm
Why not let both the women, ref a game each. :idea:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..
Let them referee together.

User avatar
turnstyle
Member
Member
Posts: 2078
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 2:30 pm
Location: Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right. Yep. Brisbane.

Post by turnstyle » Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:32 pm

Spud Murphy wrote:
Sun 27 Aug, 2017 6:24 pm
Chicken Faced Killa wrote:
Sun 27 Aug, 2017 5:55 pm
That fact she would be on our game because it doesn't have an impact on the finals would be more to do with it being her first game rather than the fact she is a women. Anyone you debuts in round 26 isn't going to be given a game that could decide a teams fate it's a big step up
A womAn - why do people always have trouble writing and saying the word woman? Happens a lot and I have no idea why. We have no trouble saying man or men in the right context, but seem to be put off by the 'wo' for some reason. Not having a go at you, Chicken Faced Killa, it's just something I see more people do than not and I find it strange.
...Not to mention the title says "Duel" rather than "Dual"... are they going to sort their domestic issues at ten paces during an NRL game?! :lol:
Image

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 29200
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Perugia Italy..

Post by Geo. » Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:35 pm

That was on purpose.. ;)
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..

User avatar
Sabre
Member
Member
Posts: 6918
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:06 pm
Location: Tiger Town

Post by Sabre » Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:41 pm

Harvey wrote:
Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:19 pm
westTAHger wrote:
Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:15 pm
Why not let both the women, ref a game each. :idea:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..
Let them referee together.
Last edited by Sabre on Tue 29 Aug, 2017 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
turnstyle
Member
Member
Posts: 2078
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 2:30 pm
Location: Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right. Yep. Brisbane.

Post by turnstyle » Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:48 pm

Geo. wrote:
Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:35 pm
That was on purpose.. ;)
Image :lol:
Image

User avatar
steve-o
Member
Member
Posts: 1896
Joined: Tue 14 Sep, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by steve-o » Tue 29 Aug, 2017 3:42 pm

A referee on debut is given a game with less scutiny... Seems fair enough to me.
Year of last finals appearance:
2018 - Storm, Roosters, Rabbitohs, Sharks, Panthers, Broncos, Dragons, Warriors
2017 - Eels, Sea Eagles, Cowboys
2016 - Raiders, Bulldogs, Titans
2013 - Knights
2011 - Tigers

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 28958
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Tue 29 Aug, 2017 4:25 pm

Harvey wrote:
Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:19 pm
westTAHger wrote:
Mon 28 Aug, 2017 5:15 pm
Why not let both the women, ref a game each. :idea:
Storm v- raiders, Storm cannot finish anywhere but first, if raiders are good enough to win they will.
Wests-tigers v warriors, a battle of the teams who pluck defeat from the jaws of victory..
Let them referee together.
In lingerie

Post Reply