What about the penalty count???

User avatar
jirskyr
Member
Member
Posts: 6175
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:00 pm

Re: What about the penalty count???

Post by jirskyr » Tue 20 Mar, 2018 3:29 pm

happy tiger wrote:
Tue 20 Mar, 2018 11:18 am

Actually they were looking at an obstruction where Lawrence contacts Slater and where the ball player was in relation to that

Rowdy should have known better , he should of avoided contact with Slater and continued his run , he was lucky he contacted the inside shoulder of Slater and the ball had just barely passed by

It was a very close thing , luckily for us the ref had called try ......
Isn't that the ruling now? Catch pass on outside shoulder and dummy runners run to inside shoulder?

In terms of 2018 interpretation and application of obstruction, I thought Rowdy did just fine, ran a good line.


happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 41543
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
Location: Watching Waiting Lurking

Post by happy tiger » Tue 20 Mar, 2018 11:54 pm

jirskyr wrote:
Tue 20 Mar, 2018 3:29 pm
happy tiger wrote:
Tue 20 Mar, 2018 11:18 am

Actually they were looking at an obstruction where Lawrence contacts Slater and where the ball player was in relation to that

Rowdy should have known better , he should of avoided contact with Slater and continued his run , he was lucky he contacted the inside shoulder of Slater and the ball had just barely passed by

It was a very close thing , luckily for us the ref had called try ......
Isn't that the ruling now? Catch pass on outside shoulder and dummy runners run to inside shoulder?

In terms of 2018 interpretation and application of obstruction, I thought Rowdy did just fine, ran a good line.
But he stopped when he reached Slater and their was a bit of a gap just inside Slater

Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 5566
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm

Post by Fade To Black » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 1:13 am

innsaneink wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 11:41 am
Balmain Boy wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 11:11 am
That sin binning was ridiculous. Matulino didn't do anything wrong. Just the rich clubs getting the calls from refs once again.
Someone needs to make a GIF of Smyths shameful dive.
Typical cheating tactics from him playing outside the spirit of the game.
He needs to be shamed and highlited on google ala Ben Creaghs tutu
100%, he needs to be called out and shamed for that pathetic dive that looked like a slide into 3rd base. Maggot of a bloke.
Surely someone on here is able to do it?

User avatar
BonusTank
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed 12 Apr, 2017 5:40 pm

Post by BonusTank » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 2:01 am

I should be able to knock one up.

Recording the game now, so once that's done I'll pop one up if no one else has by then :D
Last edited by BonusTank on Wed 21 Mar, 2018 4:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

goldcoast tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 6427
Joined: Sat 12 Apr, 2014 5:42 pm

Post by goldcoast tiger » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 2:09 am

snowleopard wrote:
Sat 17 Mar, 2018 11:46 pm
Does anyone think we did it deliberately, especially when they were in our 20 to stop their momentum and expansive plays .
Arhhh Yeah!
We’ve got to learn to make it less obvious though.
To be fair , I only saw it from the start of the second half , but most of the penalties against us were deserved.
All teams deliberately give away penalties near their tryline.
I don’t care if the refs keep up penalising for that, it’s a pain in the butt.


User avatar
BonusTank
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed 12 Apr, 2017 5:40 pm

Post by BonusTank » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 7:15 am

Fade To Black wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 1:13 am
innsaneink wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 11:41 am
Balmain Boy wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 11:11 am
That sin binning was ridiculous. Matulino didn't do anything wrong. Just the rich clubs getting the calls from refs once again.
Someone needs to make a GIF of Smyths shameful dive.
Typical cheating tactics from him playing outside the spirit of the game.
He needs to be shamed and highlited on google ala Ben Creaghs tutu
100%, he needs to be called out and shamed for that pathetic dive that looked like a slide into 3rd base. Maggot of a bloke.
Surely someone on here is able to do it?

BAM!

Last edited by BonusTank on Wed 21 Mar, 2018 7:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Needaname
Member
Member
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sun 24 Apr, 2016 1:02 pm

Post by Needaname » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 7:25 am

goldcoast tiger wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 2:09 am
snowleopard wrote:
Sat 17 Mar, 2018 11:46 pm
Does anyone think we did it deliberately, especially when they were in our 20 to stop their momentum and expansive plays .
Arhhh Yeah!
We’ve got to learn to make it less obvious though.
To be fair , I only saw it from the start of the second half , but most of the penalties against us were deserved.
All teams deliberately give away penalties near their tryline.
I don’t care if the refs keep up penalising for that, it’s a pain in the butt.
Anyone catch the Roosters Bulldogs game?
There was time when Woods was standin captain talking to the ref about being hammered for the penalty count.
The ref said it’s even after the dogs gave a couple away to allow the roosters further up field.
And woods replied it’s not they’ve given away 3 on their line that doesn’t count.
Teams, especially Melbourne and roosters will make an effort to ‘test’ the referee close to the line. The same way we managed to get 3 penalty goals to put us up a whole 6 points.
It’s deliberate and the thinking is that continually slowing the attack from the ruck frustrates the attack and ensures a greater likelihood of the attacking team getting an error.

bathursttiger
Member
Member
Posts: 2931
Joined: Thu 02 Dec, 2010 5:21 pm

Post by bathursttiger » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 8:26 am

happy tiger wrote:
Tue 20 Mar, 2018 11:18 am
Cultured Bogan wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 8:58 am
Geo. wrote:
Sun 18 Mar, 2018 8:50 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 18 Mar, 2018 8:01 am
Let’s not forget the dozen looks they had at Brooks try, looking for a reason not to give it.
On that what were they acually looking for..you don't get bunker audio at mthe game and we couldn't work it out with all the rocking and rollling

Was it some sort of obstrution lost ball what...?
They had about six thousand views of him taking the pass. They must have been thinking (or hoping) he lost it into the defender.

They were looking at every reason not to give that. I nearly fell off my chair when they said Lawrence was OK for running at Slater.
Actually they were looking at an obstruction where Lawrence contacts Slater and where the ball player was in relation to that

Rowdy should have known better , he should of avoided contact with Slater and continued his run , he was lucky he contacted the inside shoulder of Slater and the ball had just barely passed by

It was a very close thing , luckily for us the ref had called try ......
It was the pocket Ref that kept saying "I have a try".

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29728
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 8:55 am

BonusTank wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 2:01 am
I should be able to knock one up.

Recording the game now, so once that's done I'll pop one up if no one else has by then :D
Legend!

Cheers bonus

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29728
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 8:55 am

BonusTank wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 2:01 am
I should be able to knock one up.

Recording the game now, so once that's done I'll pop one up if no one else has by then :D
Legend!

Cheers bonus

formerguest
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 4138
Joined: Fri 07 Jun, 2013 7:33 pm

Post by formerguest » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 9:52 am

BonusTank wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 7:15 am
Fade To Black wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 1:13 am
innsaneink wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 11:41 am
Balmain Boy wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 11:11 am
That sin binning was ridiculous. Matulino didn't do anything wrong. Just the rich clubs getting the calls from refs once again.
Someone needs to make a GIF of Smyths shameful dive.
Typical cheating tactics from him playing outside the spirit of the game.
He needs to be shamed and highlited on google ala Ben Creaghs tutu
100%, he needs to be called out and shamed for that pathetic dive that looked like a slide into 3rd base. Maggot of a bloke.
Surely someone on here is able to do it?

BAM!

Thanks, just as I expected, a dive confirmed. His dejected expressions at the end of the match were enough for me to not worry too much about this incident, plus it may have inspired Mats to his match winning charge and offload.

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 29918
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW..

Post by Geo. » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 10:17 am

Cammy you shifty grub at the ground we thought it was for repeated infringement and Mats was just the unlucky one..

Now it appears he was unlucky to be on the end of a Cammy Academy Award...
Wests Tigers don't need a Coach.. The playing group has taken over..
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 25 Oct, 2018 12:17 am
OK I was wrong
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 22 Nov, 2018 12:13 am
I know at times I'm not always the brightest light in the kitchen

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9818
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast

Post by Yossarian » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 11:31 am

I dunno. I dislike Cameron Smith but to me it just looks he tried to change direction and fell over. Beyond that he might have over egged it.

NT Tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 3185
Joined: Sun 28 Apr, 2013 9:00 am
Location: Sitting in front of the computer (again)

Post by NT Tiger » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 12:03 pm

Yossarian wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 11:31 am
I dunno. I dislike Cameron Smith but to me it just looks he tried to change direction and fell over. Beyond that he might have over egged it.
Thats what I reckon. It looks like Matulino hardly even touches him.
"Quality Stupidity"

formerguest
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 4138
Joined: Fri 07 Jun, 2013 7:33 pm

Post by formerguest » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 12:27 pm

NT Tiger wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 12:03 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 11:31 am
I dunno. I dislike Cameron Smith but to me it just looks he tried to change direction and fell over. Beyond that he might have over egged it.
Thats what I reckon. It looks like Matulino hardly even touches him.
Nah, he plants his left and then lifts his right leg and foot so that it can slide, which is the opposite of the actions if he was wanting to go the other direction. He dropped like a spud and he had to as he was approaching running ten metres.

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29728
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 12:57 pm

Hah!
He's even conned some here

Russell
Member
Member
Posts: 5244
Joined: Sat 10 Dec, 2011 6:46 pm

Post by Russell » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 1:00 pm

innsaneink wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 12:57 pm
Hah!
He's even conned some here

Of course he did, even conned his mother into giving him life!

Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 5566
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm

Post by Fade To Black » Wed 21 Mar, 2018 2:45 pm

BonusTank wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 7:15 am
Fade To Black wrote:
Wed 21 Mar, 2018 1:13 am
innsaneink wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 11:41 am
Balmain Boy wrote:
Mon 19 Mar, 2018 11:11 am
That sin binning was ridiculous. Matulino didn't do anything wrong. Just the rich clubs getting the calls from refs once again.
Someone needs to make a GIF of Smyths shameful dive.
Typical cheating tactics from him playing outside the spirit of the game.
He needs to be shamed and highlited on google ala Ben Creaghs tutu
100%, he needs to be called out and shamed for that pathetic dive that looked like a slide into 3rd base. Maggot of a bloke.
Surely someone on here is able to do it?

BAM!

Good onya BonusT, nice job mate!
Clearly shows Smith up for the slimy, deceitful vermin the bloke is, on the field and off. Shame some people are too blind to see it, NRL HQ being the main culprits.

Post Reply