Live Game thread *spoilers

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22440
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Re: Live Game thread *spoilers

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:22 am

05TIGZ wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:13 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:10 am
TigersBusDriver wrote:
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 11:12 pm
innsaneink wrote:
Fri 23 Mar, 2018 11:11 pm

You don't win many games scoring one try... But hey we scored more than them so everything must be ok huh?
Pull you head out
That is generally how you win games
Yeah, like tonight....oh wait.
We beat the 2 premiership favourites. Should have beaten another top team. Shown defence and resilience that hasn’t been seen in this team for years and it seems some people on here are upset about it.
I’m sure you would love for me to be running them down. Sorry to disappoint.


Spud Murphy
Member
Member
Posts: 2346
Joined: Sat 13 May, 2017 5:04 pm
Location: Third Heaven

Post by Spud Murphy » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:23 am

innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:19 am
Spud Murphy wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:14 am
Cairnstigers wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:07 am
What do you guys think about this

If a game goes to extra time
A committee yet to be formed can overturn a decision they Deem to be wrong or unfair and award the two points on offer be split amongst both teams
Therefore giving one point to each team
This allows for a fair decision
Lets not forget that the refs are under extreme pressure to make a decision on the spot and this is not always the right decision
But the new committee can overturn the decision if they review the origianal decision and deem it to be wrong
I don't think any rugby league fan would disagree to this If they are being honest
The committee would have the advantage of reviewing the footage over and over
Golden point needs to be scrutinised
I believe this would be a fair way and the only way to make the correct decision
What do you think
I have an even better idea, let's piss Golden Point off altogether and go back to ending the game in a draw. If two teams are level after 80 minutes then they both deserve a point each, imo. It's a no brainer really, worked fine for about.....ah let me see.....90 bloody years or so!
Sounds good and logical to me
Indeed, If only the NRL would show some logic :brick:

User avatar
Cairnstigers
Member
Member
Posts: 963
Joined: Wed 07 Feb, 2018 10:00 pm

Post by Cairnstigers » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:27 am

05TIGZ wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:15 am
Cairnstigers wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:07 am
What do you guys think about this

If a game goes to extra time
A committee yet to be formed can overturn a decision they Deem to be wrong or unfair and award the two points on offer be split amongst both teams
Therefore giving one point to each team
This allows for a fair decision
Lets not forget that the refs are under extreme pressure to make a decision on the spot and this is not always the right decision
But the new committee can overturn the decision if they review the origianal decision and deem it to be wrong
I don't think any rugby league fan would disagree to this If they are being honest
The committee would have the advantage of reviewing the footage over and over
Golden point needs to be scrutinised
I believe this would be a fair way and the only way to make the correct decision
What do you think
I reckon If the game is tied up each team gets a point each and you play extra time for an extra point. They love extra time for tv so it isn’t going anywhere.
I don't mind this idea
At least we don't fall behind by losing two points and it gives the eventual winner an extra point for effort
But in saying that the decision that cost us the same must be ruled to be correct in the 1st place

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29264
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

05TIGZ
Member
Member
Posts: 517
Joined: Sun 26 Mar, 2017 5:57 pm

Post by 05TIGZ » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:45 am

innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am
Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.
What’s stupid about my idea stupid. Once again it’s my opinion and it’s a forum. Or we only allowed to have ideas that suit you.


User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22440
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:45 am

innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am
Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.
I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.

05TIGZ
Member
Member
Posts: 517
Joined: Sun 26 Mar, 2017 5:57 pm

Post by 05TIGZ » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:47 am

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:45 am
innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am
Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.
I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.
Why isn’t it a good idea. Your guaranteed one point for drawing and you keep playing for the chance to win another. Or do I have to run my ideas and opinions with you and your boyfriend.

User avatar
Cairnstigers
Member
Member
Posts: 963
Joined: Wed 07 Feb, 2018 10:00 pm

Post by Cairnstigers » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:00 am

innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am
Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.
But you can have 1 point each after extra time if there is no clear winner
Is that correct
So how is this any different or fairer for that matter
It is about trying to get the fairest and correct outcome for both teams
A refs wrong decision should not advantage or disadvantage any team
Especially in extra time when both teams have put in for 80 minutes of pure effart
One person in the middle deciding if we take away a 2 points or zero points
If a player fronts the duediscery over a possible illegal tackle ruled on by a refferee on the field then
Why can't that same duediscery also look at an outcome based on a refferies decision on the field in the same game
If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander
Tigers lost two because of a bad call
We may still have won or lost but that decision finalized the result

User avatar
guyofthetiger
Member
Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sun 19 Feb, 2012 6:09 pm

Post by guyofthetiger » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:04 am

Didn’t we lose another close game to the Broncos due to the ref at Campbelltown 2-3 Years back?
Crush, kill and destroy!
Said that golden Android!
Pineapples from the Dawn of Time

User avatar
Cairnstigers
Member
Member
Posts: 963
Joined: Wed 07 Feb, 2018 10:00 pm

Post by Cairnstigers » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:06 am

05TIGZ wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:47 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:45 am
innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am
Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.
I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.
Why isn’t it a good idea. Your guaranteed one point for drawing and you keep playing for the chance to win another. Or do I have to run my ideas and opinions with you and your boyfriend.
It's late but
:roll

User avatar
cktiger
Member
Member
Posts: 3499
Joined: Fri 12 Nov, 2010 10:37 am

Post by cktiger » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:08 am

Very simple ... we were robbed.

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 22440
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:12 am

Cairnstigers wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:00 am
innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am
Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.
But you can have 1 point each after extra time if there is no clear winner
Is that correct
So how is this any different or fairer for that matter
It is about trying to get the fairest and correct outcome for both teams
A refs wrong decision should not advantage or disadvantage any team
Especially in extra time when both teams have put in for 80 minutes of pure effart
One person in the middle deciding if we take away a 2 points or zero points
If a player fronts the duediscery over a possible illegal tackle ruled on by a refferee on the field then
Why can't that same duediscery also look at an outcome based on a refferies decision on the field in the same game
If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander
Tigers lost two because of a bad call
We may still have won or lost but that decision finalized the result
Take the emotion out of it, then re-examine it.

User avatar
Cairnstigers
Member
Member
Posts: 963
Joined: Wed 07 Feb, 2018 10:00 pm

Post by Cairnstigers » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:26 am

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:45 am
innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am
Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.
I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.
Is that write
I watch every game on TV and I hate bad or wrong decisions no matter what teams are playing
Even if it's Manly playing
I want fair decisions for all supporters
Do you think the penalty Brisbane got was the write decision
I don't
I thought bird scored and I called it
The bunker made a wrong call in my opinion
If it happens in the 80 minutes I can handle that
What a don't like is wrong decision after the 80 minute mark
You just need to watch the interviews after the game to see that
No one wants to win or lose a game like that
If the Tigers won like that I can honestly say it was wrong
If the duediscery split the points ofter a review of the game and it was the right decision I could handle that
Thats my opinion on the matter
But it won't make any difference to the result
Horse racing can overturn and decide a winner If they is a review
So why can't the nrl

User avatar
Cairnstigers
Member
Member
Posts: 963
Joined: Wed 07 Feb, 2018 10:00 pm

Post by Cairnstigers » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:28 am

Cairnstigers wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:26 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:45 am
innsaneink wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 12:38 am
Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.
I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.
Is that write
I watch every game on TV and I hate bad or wrong decisions no matter what teams are playing
Even if it's Manly playing
I want fair decisions for all supporters
Do you think the penalty Brisbane got was the right decision
I don't
I thought bird scored and I called it
The bunker made a wrong call in my opinion
If it happens in the 80 minutes I can handle that
What a don't like is wrong decision after the 80 minute mark
You just need to watch the interviews after the game to see that
No one wants to win or lose a game like that
If the Tigers won like that I can honestly say it was wrong
If the duediscery split the points ofter a review of the game and it was the right decision I could handle that
Thats my opinion on the matter
But it won't make any difference to the result
Horse racing can overturn and decide a winner If they is a review
So why can't the nrl

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 40791
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm

Post by happy tiger » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:32 am

As someone said the draw worked for 90 odd years , and now because of the instant gratification players and public we changed the rules

The people who run our game are fools , we change the rules that don't need changing and leave the one that need to be fixed asap

About the only rule change they introduced that was good in the last few years was the corner post

User avatar
Cairnstigers
Member
Member
Posts: 963
Joined: Wed 07 Feb, 2018 10:00 pm

Post by Cairnstigers » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:38 am

Yes that was a good change
Some brilliant tries now because of that change

bathursttiger
Member
Member
Posts: 2770
Joined: Thu 02 Dec, 2010 5:21 pm

Post by bathursttiger » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 2:37 am

happy tiger wrote:
Sat 24 Mar, 2018 1:32 am
As someone said the draw worked for 90 odd years , and now because of the instant gratification players and public we changed the rules

The people who run our game are fools , we change the rules that don't need changing and leave the one that need to be fixed asap

About the only rule change they introduced that was good in the last few years was the corner post
The TV stations love Golden Point, just to squeeze a few more ads in.

jadtiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 3360
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 8:12 am
Location: bayview

Post by jadtiger » Sat 24 Mar, 2018 5:54 am

Golden point is and always has been about TV it has nothing to do with fairness or football.If teams are locked after 80 mins its a draw and should stay so

Post Reply