Knights used HIA for Pearce Pec injury

BlackandGoldForever
Member
Member
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed 19 Mar, 2014 12:39 pm

Re: Knights used HIA for Pearce Pec injury

Post by BlackandGoldForever » Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:15 pm

Who cares it won’t help us at all it will help nsw though


User avatar
jirskyr
Member
Member
Posts: 5715
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:00 pm

Post by jirskyr » Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:37 pm

Super obvious it's not an HIA. Pearce reels out of the Marsters tackle clutching his pec and goes straight to the sideline, no head collision at all.

BlackandGoldForever
Member
Member
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed 19 Mar, 2014 12:39 pm

Post by BlackandGoldForever » Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:37 pm

Apparently knights cleared up the confusion and something about Yates was cleared

User avatar
Chicken Faced Killa
Member
Member
Posts: 1700
Joined: Mon 17 Apr, 2017 8:19 pm

Post by Chicken Faced Killa » Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:40 pm

BlackandGoldForever wrote:
Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:37 pm
Apparently knights cleared up the confusion and something about Yates was cleared
Doesn’t it have to be same player on same player off otherwise it counts as an interchange. Sounds like they have been caught and are making excuses. Doesn’t change the result and we still should have closed it out.

gallagher
Member
Member
Posts: 5022
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 1:18 pm

Post by gallagher » Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:58 pm

Just happy he misses origin.


BlackandGoldForever
Member
Member
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed 19 Mar, 2014 12:39 pm

Post by BlackandGoldForever » Sat 21 Apr, 2018 11:10 pm

Who was it that hit him ? All us blues favs are celebrating I know that , I can’t stand Pearce as a person either from real stories I’ve heard he’s a idiot it made the loss better the injury

User avatar
Tweed Tiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 2932
Joined: Thu 06 Apr, 2017 2:57 pm
Location: Tweed Heads

Post by Tweed Tiger » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 12:11 am

BlackandGoldForever wrote:
Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:37 pm
Apparently knights cleared up the confusion and something about Yates was cleared
Glad it was sorted out.

TimmyB
Member
Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue 28 Jul, 2009 5:53 pm

Post by TimmyB » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 12:17 am

Surely the player who underwent the HIA can only replace the player that replaced them? Otherwise it is a free interchange?

User avatar
Chicken Faced Killa
Member
Member
Posts: 1700
Joined: Mon 17 Apr, 2017 8:19 pm

Post by Chicken Faced Killa » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:30 am

TimmyB wrote:
Sun 22 Apr, 2018 12:17 am
Surely the player who underwent the HIA can only replace the player that replaced them? Otherwise it is a free interchange?
Yep that’s the rule.

supercoach
Member
Member
Posts: 6946
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 2:38 pm

Post by supercoach » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:35 am

We were beaten by a team that played a lot better than us...so lets not worry to much about what bad calls we got

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 28440
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:47 am

tig_prmz wrote:
Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:15 pm
it will definitely be looked at, they'll lose 2 points
I doubt it.
How would you prove it?

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 28440
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:49 am

jirskyr wrote:
Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:37 pm
Super obvious it's not an HIA. Pearce reels out of the Marsters tackle clutching his pec and goes straight to the sideline, no head collision at all.
They'll just say he had a knock earlier.
Often players are assessed a while after the incident.
It's a murky area though and often abused I'm sure many times every game

krayola
Member
Member
Posts: 716
Joined: Sat 26 Jun, 2010 10:12 am

Post by krayola » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 8:10 am

Pity he didn’t go off earlier. He was great for them.
One of my sources is Pascoe

Ags
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat 01 Jul, 2017 4:56 pm

Post by Ags » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 8:22 am

They wont lose anything. Nrl management has no stones

User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 21805
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm

Post by GNR4LIFE » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 8:23 am

innsaneink wrote:
Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:47 am
tig_prmz wrote:
Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:15 pm
it will definitely be looked at, they'll lose 2 points
I doubt it.
How would you prove it?
You can’t.

User avatar
Cultured Bogan
Member
Member
Posts: 17509
Joined: Tue 15 Sep, 2009 11:20 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Post by Cultured Bogan » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 8:31 am

GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sun 22 Apr, 2018 8:23 am
innsaneink wrote:
Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:47 am
tig_prmz wrote:
Sat 21 Apr, 2018 10:15 pm
it will definitely be looked at, they'll lose 2 points
I doubt it.
How would you prove it?
You can’t.
Unless Newcastle put their hand up and say "our bad," nothing will be done about it.

And what's the likehood of that happening?
Just because it's soap doesn't mean it's clean.

Cuando llegue el día, y estoy parado a las puertas del cielo, será Dios pidiendo mi perdón...

Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 5327
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm

Post by Fade To Black » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:15 pm

supercoach wrote:
Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:35 am
We were beaten by a team that played a lot better than us...so lets not worry to much about what bad calls we got
Blatantly bad calls put a team in a position to lose just as much as bad play does IMO. If the correct call is made on SKD walking off the mark at the finish we kick the penalty and win the game: even though we played poorly. Did SKD even play the ball correctly ONCE in the entire match? I doubt it.
The non-penalty in the play-the-ball when their bloke blatantly kicked the ball away was another disgraceful decision.
File this game in with the Korbin Sims 2nd-ball-on-the-field fiasco from a few seasons back. The refs love a good close finish and are more than happy to do their best to stage-manage a result from time to time.
In a close game I would much rather be the team who is behind with a few minutes to go, they more often than not get the rub of the green on dodgy decisions.

Newtown
Member
Member
Posts: 5516
Joined: Fri 28 Sep, 2012 8:40 am

Post by Newtown » Sun 22 Apr, 2018 7:32 pm

Win at all costs - similar to the recent test cricket incident.

Post Reply