Horror show..

User avatar
Tiger Steve
Member
Member
Posts: 1200
Joined: Wed 29 Mar, 2017 5:30 pm
Location: Chatswood West

Re: Horror show..

Post by Tiger Steve » Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:34 pm

The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
I’d like to suggest the 17 blokes wearing the jersey had something to do with it too.

Yes the 9 is a problem but so is our increasing lack of respect for the basics of attack and Defense ie: hold the friggen ball and defend as a unit
“Peanuts! Get ya peanuts - in the shell or sugar coated!” Leichhardt memories.


User avatar
Tiger Steve
Member
Member
Posts: 1200
Joined: Wed 29 Mar, 2017 5:30 pm
Location: Chatswood West

Post by Tiger Steve » Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:36 pm

I just want to add - I’ve been saying for weeks our ball handling is killing us. It would be interesting to note how many try’s against us have stemmed from handling or kicking errors.
“Peanuts! Get ya peanuts - in the shell or sugar coated!” Leichhardt memories.

TCL
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 2116
Joined: Mon 29 Aug, 2016 8:52 am

Post by TCL » Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:37 pm

The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
MM started at 9. Taylor went to 9 when MM got injured.

We don't have an 80min no 9.

User avatar
The Patriot
Member
Member
Posts: 1143
Joined: Fri 16 Feb, 2018 8:39 am

Post by The Patriot » Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:45 pm

TCL wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:37 pm
The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
MM started at 9. Taylor went to 9 when MM got injured.

We don't have an 80min no 9.
I did watch the game. It turned once Taylor came on. As it has every time he has gone to 9.

The confidence is down and the rot is setting in.
Its an opinion!

formerguest
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 3768
Joined: Fri 07 Jun, 2013 7:33 pm

Post by formerguest » Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:47 pm

TCL wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:37 pm
The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
MM started at 9. Taylor went to 9 when MM got injured.

We don't have an 80min no 9.
Except the one that played the eighty a few hours earlier in ISP today, but yeah, the top grade is a different story. Still, if Liddle was fit enough to play a full game of reserves, then he should have been playing NRL against the raiders.


TCL
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 2116
Joined: Mon 29 Aug, 2016 8:52 am

Post by TCL » Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:52 pm

formerguest wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:47 pm
TCL wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:37 pm
The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
MM started at 9. Taylor went to 9 when MM got injured.

We don't have an 80min no 9.
Except the one that played the eighty a few hours earlier in ISP today, but yeah, the top grade is a different story. Still, if Liddle was fit enough to play a full game of reserves, then he should have been playing NRL against the raiders.
Liddel wouldn't have lasted 80 mins in first grade tonight against the size of the raiders pack. Their back line is massive.

Carefactor
Member
Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon 27 Sep, 2010 6:28 pm

Post by Carefactor » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 9:33 am

chickenkebabs wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 6:32 pm
At least we’re back in familiar territory. That top four stuff was freaking me out.
Exactly!!! I feel much more at ease now knowing i dont need to take this team seriously anymore.

Clifferd
Member
Member
Posts: 177
Joined: Sat 19 Feb, 2011 8:12 pm

Post by Clifferd » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 9:47 am

The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:45 pm
TCL wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:37 pm
The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
MM started at 9. Taylor went to 9 when MM got injured.

We don't have an 80min no 9.
I did watch the game. It turned once Taylor came on. As it has every time he has gone to 9.

The confidence is down and the rot is setting in.
I felt the game changed when Hodgson came on for the Raiders. He is a superstar

User avatar
cqtiger
Member
Member
Posts: 2514
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 2:34 pm
Location: Rockhampton QLD

Post by cqtiger » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:02 am

TCL wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:37 pm
The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
MM started at 9. Taylor went to 9 when MM got injured.

We don't have an 80min no 9.
MM injured? I thought he was hooked after that pitiful attempt on Papalli who wasn’t charging at 100mph but turned his back and dawdled over the goal line.

Disgraceful. Maybe he feigned injury just to get off.

I’ll have ET, Reynolds, Godinet and anyone else after that pitiful effort.
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said a faster horse
– Henry Ford

tsjonathan
Member
Member
Posts: 1865
Joined: Sun 21 Mar, 2010 6:04 pm

Post by tsjonathan » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:05 am

all these threads are exactly the same but with a different title

User avatar
Harvey
Member
Member
Posts: 3378
Joined: Mon 22 Jun, 2015 10:01 pm
Location: Leumeah

Post by Harvey » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:19 am

Wasn't Huth garbage yesterday. How many tackles did he miss?

Clifferd
Member
Member
Posts: 177
Joined: Sat 19 Feb, 2011 8:12 pm

Post by Clifferd » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:37 am

cqtiger wrote:
Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:02 am
TCL wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:37 pm
The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
MM started at 9. Taylor went to 9 when MM got injured.

We don't have an 80min no 9.
MM injured? I thought he was hooked after that pitiful attempt on Papalli who wasn’t charging at 100mph but turned his back and dawdled over the goal line.

Disgraceful. Maybe he feigned injury just to get off.

I’ll have ET, Reynolds, Godinet and anyone else after that pitiful effort.
If MM got hooked then basically half our team deserved to get hooked for their same pathetic attempts at tackling yesterday

User avatar
diedpretty
Member
Member
Posts: 2424
Joined: Thu 16 Jul, 2009 7:31 am
Location: port macquarie

Post by diedpretty » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:39 am

Chicken Faced Killa wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 7:26 pm
Was terrible today - even in the first half we have looked like taking control of that game. A lot needs to happen until we can become a consistently good football team.
Thats true - we had the chance to finish them off in the first half - we could have quite easily led by 20 points at half time - instead we go in leading by 2 and them with all the momentum - good teams would have put Canberra to the sword in the first half.

User avatar
diedpretty
Member
Member
Posts: 2424
Joined: Thu 16 Jul, 2009 7:31 am
Location: port macquarie

Post by diedpretty » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:40 am

cqtiger wrote:
Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:02 am
TCL wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:37 pm
The Patriot wrote:
Sun 17 Jun, 2018 10:28 pm
I put that one on Cleary.

It's been coming. He's the one insisting on Taylor at 9. It all starts from there.
MM started at 9. Taylor went to 9 when MM got injured.

We don't have an 80min no 9.
MM injured? I thought he was hooked after that pitiful attempt on Papalli who wasn’t charging at 100mph but turned his back and dawdled over the goal line.

Disgraceful. Maybe he feigned injury just to get off.

I’ll have ET, Reynolds, Godinet and anyone else after that pitiful effort.
If he was hooked for that then Rochow should have gone with him.

User avatar
Sully
Member
Member
Posts: 163
Joined: Sun 18 Apr, 2010 6:47 pm

Post by Sully » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:45 am

Rochow missed Papalli. It is astounding that he is in the first grade squad as his missed tackles is extremely high for a forward and his effort and executionfor a player his size is poor

Magpie Magic
Member
Member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon 05 Apr, 2010 2:17 pm

Post by Magpie Magic » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 11:05 am

Harvey wrote:
Mon 18 Jun, 2018 10:19 am
Wasn't Huth garbage yesterday. How many tackles did he miss?
Certainly his worst for us. It may be just the attitude in the team at the moment.
Even saw Thompson miss a few and loose interest. I guess intensity is goid but you don't want to be the only one putting in.
Maybe too having been conditioned to be in every match after the injuries and once the score got to 32 they all just lost heart.
We haven't had much luck lately. Can't get Reynolds on the field sin bins at crucial times playing opponents getting key players back and a few calls.
Losing Mcllirick and especially Rowdy who has been exceptional and then Fanoua down the left side with the attended reshuffle created 3 or 4 tries for them.
Gamble looked good but Brooks misses Benji i feel.

Tigergoo
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun 09 Apr, 2017 7:47 am

Post by Tigergoo » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 11:42 am

That performance is up there with worst this club has ever produced. We are damn lucky The Raiders didn’t put 70 plus on us. If not for some help from the refs they score 3 or 4 more tries.

User avatar
hugh1954
Member
Member
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri 17 May, 2013 10:10 pm
Location: Maitland

Post by hugh1954 » Mon 18 Jun, 2018 12:20 pm

Knew we were in for a bad day as soon as Brooks started to bobble and drops balls early, even John's orgasms over his kicks didn't help

Post Reply