i don't understand....

Post Reply
User avatar
citizen cub
Member
Member
Posts: 1050
Joined: Thu 16 Jul, 2009 7:20 pm

i don't understand....

Post by citizen cub » Sun 16 May, 2010 4:37 pm

how people picked us top 4. WHAT has actually changed??????? i'd like to know what has changed to last year??????? we signed tuqiri yes, but that is only 1 winger. tuqiri must be wondering what he has got himself into.
With Wests in the finals, ANYTHING'S POSSIBLE


User avatar
RatedRKO
Member
Member
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 10:57 pm

Post by RatedRKO » Sun 16 May, 2010 4:39 pm

In our first few games with Moltzen, we did look like top 4 contenders. He goes down and we look like bottom 4. There has to be more to it...

Tiger_heart
Member
Member
Posts: 636
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 1:28 pm

Post by Tiger_heart » Sun 16 May, 2010 4:47 pm

djm619 wrote:In our first few games with Moltzen, we did look like top 4 contenders. He goes down and we look like bottom 4. There has to be more to it...
Agree - if one man can make that much of a difference, then Moltzen has suddenly become a $500K / year player, well above Marshall and co.

X-Pac
Member
Member
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 5:25 pm

Post by X-Pac » Sun 16 May, 2010 5:13 pm

well lets look at our wins

Manly - out of form they even loss to parra the same way and they were horrible
Eels - terrible early team,they havent really picked it up to the last 3 weeks another win for us against a out of form team
Raiders - hardly a great win :?
Nth Qld - see raiders

so yeh not like we have beaten good teams

User avatar
NJLM78
Member
Member
Posts: 2693
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 1:51 pm

Post by NJLM78 » Sun 16 May, 2010 5:56 pm

X-Pac wrote:well lets look at our wins

Manly - out of form they even loss to parra the same way and they were horrible
Eels - terrible early team,they havent really picked it up to the last 3 weeks another win for us against a out of form team
Raiders - hardly a great win :?
Nth Qld - see raiders

so yeh not like we have beaten good teams
And then the losses

Roosters - Were leading 12-0 threw that away after we looked to be well on top.
Bulldogs - Had lost 3 in a row heading into that game. Showed some heart and beat us by 20.
Panthers - at Penrith lost by 8 - played the young half at fullback.
Roosters at Campbelltown - Couldn't score points against a very ordinary team in front of a big C'town crowd.
Souths - Souths didn't look like a great team but were way way too good for us.

Really worrying signs!


User avatar
Balmain Bug
Member
Member
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 7:02 pm

Post by Balmain Bug » Sun 16 May, 2010 8:20 pm

Piss Sheens off and we will still make the Semi's. trust me.

Sheens = No semi's
No Sheens = Semi's.
Wests Tigers colours are Black, White & Orange. Balmain are Black & Orange. Wests Tigers are not Balmain. Please take note Wests Tigers CEO.

User avatar
stryker
Member
Member
Posts: 10825
Joined: Sun 19 Jul, 2009 4:16 pm
Location: Cairns

Post by stryker » Sun 16 May, 2010 8:28 pm

Tiger_heart wrote:
djm619 wrote:In our first few games with Moltzen, we did look like top 4 contenders. He goes down and we look like bottom 4. There has to be more to it...
Agree - if one man can make that much of a difference, then Moltzen has suddenly become a $500K / year player, well above Marshall and co.
As silly as that sounds where is an alternate reasoning?

The loss of that one player has turned us into a shambles.

Cant be that easily solved...there are BIG PROBLEMS with this side.

User avatar
Granto87
Member
Member
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon 12 Oct, 2009 3:13 pm

Post by Granto87 » Sun 16 May, 2010 8:30 pm

Balmain Bug wrote:p**s Sheens off and we will still make the Semi's. trust me.

Sheens = No semi's
No Sheens = Semi's.

Any ideas how to get rid of him mr bug???

User avatar
tiger05
Member
Member
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 9:02 pm

Post by tiger05 » Sun 16 May, 2010 8:40 pm

It isn't Moltzen. He didn't even look good when we were winning. He was allowing Marshall to get out wide but I don't think that was the main reason for Marshalls good form.

I think it is simply Sheens doesn't have them well drilled and he doesn't worry firstly about defence and go forward.

angeman
Member
Member
Posts: 477
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 7:14 am

Post by angeman » Sun 16 May, 2010 9:07 pm

how can we not make the top HALF of the table for 4 years and looks like going on 5.
8 out of the 16 make the cut for goodness sake and this year it is only 15!

Post Reply