THE scrum with 28 sec's left

Year of the Tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 565
Joined: Mon 08 Mar, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Brisbane via Leichardt

Re: THE scrum with 28 sec's left

Post by Year of the Tiger » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 12:04 pm

There cant be too many instances in the history of finals football where a team has lost in such a dramatic and downright STUPID way. The boys played their socks off and deserved to win. But I was disgusted with that scrum. It was heartbreaking to watch and you knew they were going to get a field goal. I went into shock and overtime was a blur. I am hurting today
2 October 2005 was the greatest day of my life ...


User avatar
glebe_tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 798
Joined: Wed 15 Jul, 2009 2:19 pm

Post by glebe_tiger » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 12:21 pm

The decision to not penalize the roosters for that scrum is a fucking disgrace, refs cost us for 2010 end of story, and they didn't allow Ellis try with benjis push and shove. Still fuming.

User avatar
AndTheKungFoSing
Admin with a flute?
Admin with a flute?
Posts: 2486
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 8:28 am
Location: Behind You!
Contact:

Post by AndTheKungFoSing » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 12:53 pm

Heighno didn't pick it up because if he did it would have been a penalty!
I hate South Sydney.... immensely

tig_prmz
Member
Member
Posts: 7948
Joined: Sat 03 Oct, 2009 10:32 pm

Post by tig_prmz » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 1:41 pm

Kaiser wrote:Heighno didn't pick it up because if he did it would have been a penalty!
are you saying that if Heighno picked up the ball, it would have been a penalty?
My Round 1 Team 2018

1. lolo 2. noffa 3. suli 4. milne 5. fonua
6. reynolds 7. brooks
8. packer 9. ET 10. Twal
11. McQuen 12. Lawrence 13. Eiso
14. Matulino 15. McIllwrick 16. Sue 17. Aloiai
18. Marsters 19. Benji 20. Grant 21. K Naiqama
Next: Liddle, MCK, Felise, MWZ, Thompson, Rochow, Gamble

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 27532
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 1:54 pm

Kaiser wrote:Heighno didn't pick it up because if he did it would have been a penalty!
I dont see your logic.

Im assuming youre saying he thought he would be penalised if he picked it up, dropped on it...why?

It was a mess of a scrum, front rows werent bound proper;ly, the scrum screwed (I bet that gives the younger readers a chuckle) ...players broke early, the ref s*** himself....Nuasalla was the hooker and he ended up on it
Shouldve been repacked at the least, penalty Tigers at worst


User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 27849
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW..

Post by Geo. » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:00 pm

My God..It should have..... of course.....then again Carney's pass should have been ruled forward and the Ellis try should have been awarded...

What difference does it make really...i don't see the logic in should have's...

ROBBED...of course we were!!!!!!!!
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..
happy tiger wrote:
Mon 11 Jun, 2018 10:03 pm


Sorry FT , you know I'm not the brightest match in the pile

User avatar
Fraze23
Member
Member
Posts: 1892
Joined: Thu 15 Jul, 2010 4:21 pm
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom

Post by Fraze23 » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:02 pm

I just dont understand that they call back hundreds of scrums for less than that last night. And they let that go?
Wheres the consistency? The stakes change in the finals but the rules definately stay the same

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 27532
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:09 pm

Logic?
Its called discussion geo...its what we that dont follow others around do here

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 27849
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW..

Post by Geo. » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:13 pm

Sorry for having an opinion on should haves...

What if Heino had jumeped on the ball what decision do you think the refs should have made?
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..
happy tiger wrote:
Mon 11 Jun, 2018 10:03 pm


Sorry FT , you know I'm not the brightest match in the pile

tig_prmz
Member
Member
Posts: 7948
Joined: Sat 03 Oct, 2009 10:32 pm

Post by tig_prmz » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:14 pm

Also, when Payten threw the forward pass to Lui, he was miles offside. Should've been a penalty to Roosters. But I'm a Tigers supporter so I wouldn't wanna bring it up on the Roosters forum.
My Round 1 Team 2018

1. lolo 2. noffa 3. suli 4. milne 5. fonua
6. reynolds 7. brooks
8. packer 9. ET 10. Twal
11. McQuen 12. Lawrence 13. Eiso
14. Matulino 15. McIllwrick 16. Sue 17. Aloiai
18. Marsters 19. Benji 20. Grant 21. K Naiqama
Next: Liddle, MCK, Felise, MWZ, Thompson, Rochow, Gamble

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 27532
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:22 pm

Geo. wrote:Sorry for having an opinion on should haves...

If only Heibgo had jumeped on the ball what decision do you think the refs should have made?
Are we talking by the rule book, or interpretionally the way theyve rulled all year?

If the defending hooker was deemed to be permitted to dive on it, why shouldnt the attacking lock?

As I stated earlier there were any number of options that couldve been ruled on....though they never are. Coz scrums are never a contest....except in a semi in the final minute in a 1 point ballgame

Its why were discussing what shoulda and coulda been, coz they (the refs) once again have moved the fekin posts after the kickoff- get it?

Magpie Magic
Member
Member
Posts: 1044
Joined: Mon 05 Apr, 2010 2:17 pm

Post by Magpie Magic » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:30 pm

Truth is we should have got a penalty from the scrum but Heino should have fell on it anyway.

Besides,Easts were offside all night and slow off us.

But I"m pissed off that once again we let abig lead slip after we clocked off.

I was the last one they let in the car park and felt lucky.In the first half I felt here comes another comp.

And now ,we look gone.

PS nothing on lotto either.Shattered.

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 27849
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW..

Post by Geo. » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:31 pm

innsaneink wrote: Are we talking by the rule book, or interpretionally the way theyve rulled all year?

If the defending hooker was deemed to be permitted to dive on it, why shouldnt the attacking lock?

As I stated earlier there were any number of options that couldve been ruled on....though they never are. Coz scrums are never a contest....except in a semi in the final minute in a 1 point ballgame

Its why were discussing what shoulda and coulda been, coz they (the refs) once again have moved the fekin posts after the kickoff- get it?
got it..

:? I think we agree...

Watching the Dwyer hit again I believe it should have been play on...JWH lost the ball Dwyer picked it up..but those interpretations have gone that way all year...

As for the scum it was a shamozzle just like the last 1 when every rorter broke before the ball was put in...that happened right in fronto of me...Do you think they would blow a scrum penalty in the 98th minute...not likely?
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..
happy tiger wrote:
Mon 11 Jun, 2018 10:03 pm


Sorry FT , you know I'm not the brightest match in the pile

User avatar
MGB
Member
Member
Posts: 528
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 9:06 am

Post by MGB » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:40 pm

The Dwyer hit was a great shot but was a 50/50 call if we are truly looking for consistency, the scrum however was a joke and should have never been allowed to be completed...you gotta wonder sometimes what the hell goes on out there, the ref's this year will have some very serious review work to do at seasons end if they are fair dinkum about improving.

User avatar
Tigerdave
Member
Member
Posts: 10668
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 6:04 am
Location: Lismore

Post by Tigerdave » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 2:55 pm

it's either a penalty to us or they re-do the scrum....they've been doing it all year, except in this instance....I'm still in the 'fuming line' myself.

The guys on the Roast were busy roasting the scrum too. Down to 12 guys in the final 8 minutes or so, we played and defended out of our skins only to be robbed at the end.

What makes it worse is the Panthers losing, we could have had a week off, which we needed given the injuries.

User avatar
senexx
Member
Member
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 12:39 pm
Contact:

Post by senexx » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 4:03 pm

To say what I think would be to break Godwin's Law
Courage in my Blood
And Stripes across My Heart
- senex tigris

Year of the Tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 565
Joined: Mon 08 Mar, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Brisbane via Leichardt

Post by Year of the Tiger » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 4:10 pm

That damn scrum lost us the season, one moment! Dont kids yourselves people, if won that game right there at that very moment, we really could have gone all the way. I love heighno but that effort at that point was woeful. Cant remember any game hurting so much. And in the end, we gave it to those eastern suburb pr&cks!
2 October 2005 was the greatest day of my life ...

william rodgers
Member
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat 17 Apr, 2010 10:53 am

Post by william rodgers » Sun 12 Sep, 2010 4:15 pm

Unforgiven is correct why why didnt the ref let dwyer play on, then its game over no chance of the roosters winning the scrum against the feed, we win roosters loose simple.

Post Reply