Is Alan Jones Right?

ImageImageImage
Saturday 25 September 2010 7:30PM
ANZ Stadium
Television Coverage: Ch. 9 Live
magpiecol
Member
Member
Posts: 2913
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 3:02 pm

Re: Is Alan Jones Right?

Post by magpiecol » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 2:01 pm

redemption wrote:The NRL interpretations are the rules nowadays - not the rule book!

Look at the separation "rule" - it is not in the book!!

As such - Jones is wrong!!!

How can he be wrong if it is the rule book. Lay off the Kool-aid, your prejudice is showing.


User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9379
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast

Post by Yossarian » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 2:13 pm

Balmain Bug wrote:Alan Jones is correct. He is not wrong at all. I have the rule book here right in front of me and it states throwing the ball out from within the confines of the field of play deliberately is a penalty to the other side.

But, the NRL will argue that throwing the ball backwards is permissible (its not).

And throwing the ball out forwards is a penalty, which it definately is anyway.

That is what Robert Finch will say, I bet you $100000000000000.

**** sub edit ******
The rule book I have is a referee's examination book for 2009 which I got for my coaches ticket.
Does it cite what the relevant rule number is BB? I had a look earlier and couldn't find anything.

tig_prmz
Member
Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: Sat 03 Oct, 2009 10:32 pm

Post by tig_prmz » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 2:22 pm

Wait so if Benji throws a wild pass out on the full or Beau is getting dumped towards the sideline and he chucks the ball but ends up going over the sidleine, that would be a penalty??
My Round 1 Team 2018

1. lolo 2. noffa 3. suli 4. milne 5. fonua
6. reynolds 7. brooks
8. packer 9. ET 10. Twal
11. McQuen 12. Lawrence 13. Eiso
14. Matulino 15. McIllwrick 16. Sue 17. Aloiai
18. Marsters 19. Benji 20. Grant 21. K Naiqama
Next: Liddle, MCK, Felise, MWZ, Thompson, Rochow, Gamble

tig_prmz
Member
Member
Posts: 7949
Joined: Sat 03 Oct, 2009 10:32 pm

Post by tig_prmz » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 2:23 pm

Edit: missed the part about throwing it DELIBERATELY
My Round 1 Team 2018

1. lolo 2. noffa 3. suli 4. milne 5. fonua
6. reynolds 7. brooks
8. packer 9. ET 10. Twal
11. McQuen 12. Lawrence 13. Eiso
14. Matulino 15. McIllwrick 16. Sue 17. Aloiai
18. Marsters 19. Benji 20. Grant 21. K Naiqama
Next: Liddle, MCK, Felise, MWZ, Thompson, Rochow, Gamble

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 27895
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW..

Post by Geo. » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 3:08 pm

Balmain Bug wrote:Alan Jones is correct. He is not wrong at all. I have the rule book here right in front of me and it states throwing the ball out from within the confines of the field of play deliberately is a penalty to the other side.

But, the NRL will argue that throwing the ball backwards is permissible (its not).

And throwing the ball out forwards is a penalty, which it definately is anyway.

That is what Robert Finch will say, I bet you $100000000000000.

**** sub edit ******
The rule book I have is a referee's examination book for 2009 which I got for my coaches ticket.
God HELP us all... :lol:

Bug you are correct...but who cares now ...we were dudded the whole finals series and still almost pulled off...

I hope St Choke the life out of the Cock's..
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..


User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 27601
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 4:12 pm

Balmain Bug wrote:Alan Jones is correct. He is not wrong at all. I have the rule book here right in front of me and it states throwing the ball out from within the confines of the field of play deliberately is a penalty to the other side.

But, the NRL will argue that throwing the ball backwards is permissible (its not).

And throwing the ball out forwards is a penalty, which it definately is anyway.

That is what Robert Finch will say, I bet you $100000000000000.

**** sub edit ******
The rule book I have is a referee's examination book for 2009 which I got for my coaches ticket.

Throwing it back is allowable...forward not.
You owe me $100000000000000.

User avatar
Blackpearl
Member
Member
Posts: 1340
Joined: Thu 20 Aug, 2009 12:01 pm
Location: The burbs

Post by Blackpearl » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 4:17 pm

Yossarian wrote:
smeghead wrote:My default position is that Alan Jones is wrong about everything :)
My first thoughts as well. As usual I think Jones has it arse-up... Sounds like one of the 30,000 union rules. I have NEVER seen anyone penalised for doing this in an NRL game.
is that a freudian slip ??
I dislike sowfs immensely

king sirro
Member
Member
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 9:39 am

Post by king sirro » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 4:20 pm

redemption wrote:The NRL interpretations are the rules nowadays - not the rule book!

Look at the separation "rule" - it is not in the book!!

As such - Jones is wrong!!!

Jones is right, and id summons a guess that he would be right a lot more often than he is wrong............compared to those bagging him that is
LAUGH NOW CRY LATER--JS

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9379
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast

Post by Yossarian » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 4:49 pm

Could someone who agrees with AJ please cite what rule they are referring to?

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 27601
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 4:51 pm

Yossarian wrote:Could someone who agrees with AJ please cite what rule they are referring to?
Yes, Bug or KS...I think KS is more defending AJ :oops: how embarrasing, than debating the rule

User avatar
Spartan117
Member
Member
Posts: 5730
Joined: Wed 07 Oct, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney

Post by Spartan117 » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 5:16 pm

This is Wrong according to the boys on 2SM talkin sport. The only time this would be a penalty is if their was an intentional forward pass in the mix.
UTT - Up The Tigers

king sirro
Member
Member
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 9:39 am

Post by king sirro » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 6:01 pm

innsaneink wrote:
Yossarian wrote:Could someone who agrees with AJ please cite what rule they are referring to?
Yes, Bug or KS...I think KS is more defending AJ :oops: how embarrasing, than debating the rule

Yes more defending him and not embarrassed by it at all
LAUGH NOW CRY LATER--JS

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 27601
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 6:18 pm

As I thought, so all we have to go on is Bugs word.......okaaaay. :?

User avatar
farahfan
Member
Member
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 5:27 pm

Post by farahfan » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 7:00 pm

Spartan117 wrote:This is Wrong according to the boys on 2SM talkin sport. The only time this would be a penalty is if their was an intentional forward pass in the mix.
but that would be because an intentional forward pass is a penalty in the first place

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9379
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast

Post by Yossarian » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 8:40 pm

farahfan wrote:
Spartan117 wrote:This is Wrong according to the boys on 2SM talkin sport. The only time this would be a penalty is if their was an intentional forward pass in the mix.
but that would be because an intentional forward pass is a penalty in the first place
So is a deliberate knock-down I believe. But when was the last time you saw that penalised?

Leroy The Tigers Fan
Member
Member
Posts: 832
Joined: Sat 13 Mar, 2010 10:10 am

Post by Leroy The Tigers Fan » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 9:03 pm

Alan Jones has no care for the club that he effectively ruined - no clue about rugby league - and nothing else to say worth listening to![/quote]

How did Jones ruin Balmain?, everything I've ever read suggests that he bought a lot of sponsorship dollars and benefactors to the club, this is why they were reluctant to sack him and WHY Souths couldn't wait to snap him up.
He may have been an ordinary coach but don't hold that against him, Wayne Pearce took over from Alan and with a similar roster and look what happened, the old wooden spoon, not something that we ever were fond of!.
If he has nothing worth listening to then why is he one of the hightest paid commentators in the Country :roll:

redemption
Member
Member
Posts: 1475
Joined: Wed 26 May, 2010 3:24 am

Post by redemption » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 9:09 pm

king sirro wrote:
redemption wrote:The NRL interpretations are the rules nowadays - not the rule book!

Look at the separation "rule" - it is not in the book!!

As such - Jones is wrong!!!

Jones is right, and id summons a guess that he would be right a lot more often than he is wrong............compared to those bagging him that is
Got it really right for Balmain in 1992 - when he sacked Freeman for Brian Smith genius!!!!

(Freeman won the 93 Dally M at the Roosters moron - and Balmain won the spoon in 94!!!!!!!)

Look at the Farenheit 451 debacle and his public toilet memoirs befors criticising those who know.

Sirro - you have clearly never even seen your namesake at his best (1986-1994)!!!


As for Leroy - he never brought a cent in sponsors to Balmain!!!! Ask Barnes - Elias - Trodden - Humphreys and they will all tell you the same!!!!! What did he do when he went to Souths??? Nothing - which is better than he did for us!!

Were your even alive then genius!!!!

User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 27895
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW..

Post by Geo. » Mon 27 Sep, 2010 9:10 pm

Soooo..is Bug right...

God I hope so...
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..

Post Reply