Zane Tetavano: only 1 week

NRL and other Australian Rugby League Discussion
Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 4768
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 57 times

Zane Tetavano: only 1 week

Unread post by Fade To Black » Wed 06 Sep, 2017 8:20 pm

Just saw that Zane Tetavano got his suspension reduced from a possible 5 weeks down to 1 for his head-high tackle that resulted in a bloke knocked out and medi-cabbed from the field. That'd be right! What a joke.
Unca Nick and his wallet have done it again it seems. The NRL came out and made a point of saying contact with the head will be dealt with harshly and this is their penalty? There wasn't a huge amount wrong with the tackle apart from FIRST CONTACT BEING MADE WITH THE HEAD.
The judiciary is laughable, anyone remember Bryce Gibbs getting 3 or 4 weeks for an accidental knee on Luke Burt in 2010 or thereabouts? Or Marty Taupau when he played for WT getting 4 weeks for a love-tap of a hit on James Maloney? The double-standards in the NRL are astonishing.


User avatar
Geo.
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 24954
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW.
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 333 times

Unread post by Geo. » Wed 06 Sep, 2017 8:23 pm

I think they had a good case...
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..
Tiger Watto wrote:
Fri 03 Nov, 2017 8:07 am
Geo nailed it...

Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 4768
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 57 times

Unread post by Fade To Black » Wed 06 Sep, 2017 9:26 pm

Geo. wrote:
Wed 06 Sep, 2017 8:23 pm
I think they had a good case...
As in what, the shoulder to the chin that knocked a bloke out cold?
Or the not insignificant fact that he is a Rooster, a club whose players always seem to get "fortunate" at the judiciary?
Can't see the difference between his hit and Sia Soliola's on Slater myself, first contact was to the head in both instances. Slater was falling to the ground more than the Titans player if anything. One player gets 4 weeks and the other gets 1......it is a joke.
Mumps Robinson described it as a "perfect hit" at the judiciary, hope he sees it that way this weekend if Mitchell Pearce or Boyd Cordner cop a similar one. Doubt he would.

User avatar
innsaneink
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 25210
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....
Has liked: 242 times
Been liked: 185 times

Unread post by innsaneink » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 5:37 am

Gotta agree with OP....the inconsistency is a joke. first contact was the head

How Lussick was found not guilty of tripping (his 2nd or third offencee too mind you) has me baffled as well

tigerbenji
Member
Member
Posts: 2149
Joined: Thu 03 Mar, 2011 12:48 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Unread post by tigerbenji » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 7:17 am

Semi Final time, Theses Clubs get away with murder.


TiggaPlease
Member
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu 14 Jan, 2010 4:43 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time

Unread post by TiggaPlease » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 7:51 am

It would've been a disgrace if he got 5 weeks, absolutely no intent in it.

User avatar
diedpretty
Member
Member
Posts: 2140
Joined: Thu 16 Jul, 2009 7:31 am
Location: port macquarie
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 20 times

Unread post by diedpretty » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:21 am

TiggaPlease wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 7:51 am
It would've been a disgrace if he got 5 weeks, absolutely no intent in it.
Doesn't have to be intent if the contact is with the head - careless and reckless.

TiggaPlease
Member
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu 14 Jan, 2010 4:43 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time

Unread post by TiggaPlease » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:59 am

diedpretty wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:21 am
TiggaPlease wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 7:51 am
It would've been a disgrace if he got 5 weeks, absolutely no intent in it.
Doesn't have to be intent if the contact is with the head - careless and reckless.
Can't agree with you there mate (On the careless and reckless bit), It was a solid front on hit and it was unlucky that the shoulder hit the head. The outrage seems to be on the fact that Nakubuwai go knocked out. Worse stuff happens every weekend but the NRL seems to let most things go unless there is an injury, or they feel the need to make an example of a low profile player.

User avatar
barra
Member
Member
Posts: 2033
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: Sth Coast
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 9 times

Unread post by barra » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 10:01 am

diedpretty wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:21 am
TiggaPlease wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 7:51 am
It would've been a disgrace if he got 5 weeks, absolutely no intent in it.
Doesn't have to be intent if the contact is with the head - careless and reckless.
This was the point they made when they said they'd get heavy - that a player's head needed to be protected - and started dishing out severe penalties.

As usual, that hard and fast rule didn't last long became very subjective. If the same tackle was made back then and the player was knocked unconscious the penalty would have much more severe.

User avatar
sheer64
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 4214
Joined: Sun 23 Sep, 2012 2:06 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 25 times

Unread post by sheer64 » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 10:34 am

Should of got life and the Rorters thrown out of the comp!
Arise Sir Waste Anasta, Tool of the highest order!

goldcoast tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5398
Joined: Sat 12 Apr, 2014 5:42 pm
Has liked: 34 times
Been liked: 57 times

Unread post by goldcoast tiger » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 12:44 pm

The campaign against the dangerous head hits goes on for a week or too then drops of until someone gets a bad one, and even then the offending player is unlucky if he gets more than a penalty there's been quite a few that deserved a send off this year, but we can't spoil a game for the tv viewers, can we?
A lot gets said about player sFety, but until someone sucessfully sues the nrl , it will go on with excuses over and over.
ANY contact with the head or the neck( there's hardly a set that goes by that doesn't involve an arm around the neck in at least one tackle) should be taken out of the game.
It's not necessary.
I'm just wondering who will be the first to deliberately take out the opposition gamebreaker in the Finals.
Ita worth taking the chance now with the no send off attitude that referees seem to be running with.
The GF is the best game for anyone to try it as they won't get sent off, and a few weeks off at the start of next season is not a problem for anyone if they can get a Cronk or or a Cleary out of the game early . With the concussion laws in the game now, a team can lose their top player even if the head hit isn't a really bad one. Without the send off hanging over them, I'll be surprised if someone doesn't take the gamble. In a GF there's no worrying about tomorrow

User avatar
4jtigers
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed 21 Sep, 2011 11:19 am
Location: Doonside NSW
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 3 times

Unread post by 4jtigers » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 1:46 pm

barra wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 10:01 am
diedpretty wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:21 am
TiggaPlease wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 7:51 am
It would've been a disgrace if he got 5 weeks, absolutely no intent in it.
Doesn't have to be intent if the contact is with the head - careless and reckless.
This was the point they made when they said they'd get heavy - that a player's head needed to be protected - and started dishing out severe penalties.

As usual, that hard and fast rule didn't last long became very subjective. If the same tackle was made back then and the player was knocked unconscious the penalty would have much more severe.
The Soliola hit was late but there was no intent to hit Slater on the head. Slater slipped - Tigga - what do you reckon? Soliola got charged incorrectly for 5 weeks? should've been a week too right? very unlucky that Slater (the grub) slipped aye :roll:
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked. A complex system designed from scratch never works and cannot be patched up to make it work. You have to start over with a working simple system. – John Gall

TiggaPlease
Member
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu 14 Jan, 2010 4:43 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time

Unread post by TiggaPlease » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 3:11 pm

4jtigers wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 1:46 pm
barra wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 10:01 am
diedpretty wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:21 am
TiggaPlease wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 7:51 am
It would've been a disgrace if he got 5 weeks, absolutely no intent in it.
Doesn't have to be intent if the contact is with the head - careless and reckless.
This was the point they made when they said they'd get heavy - that a player's head needed to be protected - and started dishing out severe penalties.

As usual, that hard and fast rule didn't last long became very subjective. If the same tackle was made back then and the player was knocked unconscious the penalty would have much more severe.
The Soliola hit was late but there was no intent to hit Slater on the head. Slater slipped - Tigga - what do you reckon? Soliola got charged incorrectly for 5 weeks? should've been a week too right? very unlucky that Slater (the grub) slipped aye :roll:
Oh spare me! Not even comparable.

The Tetavano hit is almost the same as the Simon Dwyer hit on JWH back in the day, except Tetavano actually used wrapped his arms. Reckon Dwyer should've been rubbed out for 5 weeks for that hit?

Russell
Member
Member
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat 10 Dec, 2011 6:46 pm
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 118 times

Unread post by Russell » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 3:44 pm

TiggaPlease wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 3:11 pm
4jtigers wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 1:46 pm
barra wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 10:01 am
diedpretty wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:21 am


Doesn't have to be intent if the contact is with the head - careless and reckless.
This was the point they made when they said they'd get heavy - that a player's head needed to be protected - and started dishing out severe penalties.

As usual, that hard and fast rule didn't last long became very subjective. If the same tackle was made back then and the player was knocked unconscious the penalty would have much more severe.
The Soliola hit was late but there was no intent to hit Slater on the head. Slater slipped - Tigga - what do you reckon? Soliola got charged incorrectly for 5 weeks? should've been a week too right? very unlucky that Slater (the grub) slipped aye :roll:
Oh spare me! Not even comparable.

The Tetavano hit is almost the same as the Simon Dwyer hit on JWH back in the day, except Tetavano actually used wrapped his arms. Reckon Dwyer should've been rubbed out for 5 weeks for that hit?
Absolute rubbish - shoulder charges were legal when Dwyer hit JWH.

So rubbed out for what?

tsjonathan
Member
Member
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sun 21 Mar, 2010 6:04 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 10 times

Unread post by tsjonathan » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 5:06 pm

i didn't see it

did it make contact to the head?

i remember the hit i think he put on against the bulldogs which sent Hoppa to the hospital with an eye socket injury

Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 4768
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 57 times

Unread post by Fade To Black » Thu 07 Sep, 2017 6:59 pm

tsjonathan wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 5:06 pm
i didn't see it

did it make contact to the head?

i remember the hit i think he put on against the bulldogs which sent Hoppa to the hospital with an eye socket injury
Yep shoulder to the chin, instant knockout. Should of got more than 1 week. Typical NRL playing favourites yet again. Hopefully Tetevano the wife beater cops his own headhigh bellringer next week.

maxxy86
Member
Member
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri 04 Mar, 2011 11:54 am
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 15 times

Unread post by maxxy86 » Fri 08 Sep, 2017 11:14 am

I don't know anything about the tackle but what has made my day.... ' mumps Robinson' Now that's funny!!!!
Bit like the judiciary at the nrl. How D larsack plays idk?..??....
Well its nearly time to have a 'CRACK'....Go you :sign:

tig_prmz
Member
Member
Posts: 7901
Joined: Sat 03 Oct, 2009 10:32 pm
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 18 times

Unread post by tig_prmz » Fri 08 Sep, 2017 12:03 pm

TiggaPlease wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:59 am
diedpretty wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 9:21 am
TiggaPlease wrote:
Thu 07 Sep, 2017 7:51 am
It would've been a disgrace if he got 5 weeks, absolutely no intent in it.
Doesn't have to be intent if the contact is with the head - careless and reckless.
Can't agree with you there mate (On the careless and reckless bit), It was a solid front on hit and it was unlucky that the shoulder hit the head. The outrage seems to be on the fact that Nakubuwai go knocked out. Worse stuff happens every weekend but the NRL seems to let most things go unless there is an injury, or they feel the need to make an example of a low profile player.
stay arms hit the head, fingers hit the head too sometimes but they are not with force. When making a "hard" tackle, you understand the risk that if you hit the head (even by accident) then you face the risk involved.

you can't get away with illegally knocking someone out (even by accident)
My Round 1 Team 2018

1. lolo 2. noffa 3. suli 4. milne 5. fonua
6. reynolds 7. brooks
8. packer 9. ET 10. Twal
11. McQuen 12. Lawrence 13. Eiso
14. Matulino 15. McIllwrick 16. Sue 17. Aloiai
18. Marsters 19. Benji 20. Grant 21. K Naiqama
Next: Liddle, MCK, Felise, MWZ, Thompson, Rochow, Gamble

Post Reply

Return to “National Rugby League”