Storm keen to pursue fan-ownership model in NRL

NRL and other Australian Rugby League Discussion
Post Reply
User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29294
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Storm keen to pursue fan-ownership model in NRL

Post by innsaneink » Thu 04 Oct, 2018 4:33 pm

Melbourne Storm keen to pursue fan-ownership model in NRL similar to NFL's Green Bay Packers

The Melbourne Storm's major shareholders have announced they are assessing the viability of a fan-ownership model akin to the Green Bay Packers of the NFL.


Key points:

The Storm want to adopt a fan ownership model to drive financial growth
The fan ownership model is based on the NFL's Green Bay Packers in the US
The club hopes to have 50,000 members by 2023


The Storm, who lost the NRL grand final against the Sydney Roosters on Sunday, said in a statement: "The concept will give the public the opportunity to invest in the football club and in turn become not just fans but shareholders in the Melbourne Storm."

They have one of the highest membership bases of any NRL club, with about 25,000 people signing up this season. They sit behind only the Broncos, Rabbitohs and Eels.

Storm chairman Bart Campbell, who is one of three owners of the club alongside Gerry Ryan and Matt Tripp, is excited about exploring the fan-ownership model.

"When the owners took control of the Melbourne Storm five years ago, we committed to explore the viability of the fan-ownership model once we had established a sustainable financial platform for further growth," he said.

"We have been able to achieve that objective with the support of our fans and commercial partners, and now is the time for us to look at the future of our football club.

"We see fan ownership as an innovative way to set the platform to turbo charge the ambitious growth plans we have for the Storm, including doubling our membership to 50,000 by 2023.

"We know this is a complex issue and it will take some time to fully understand the interest and detail of a fan-ownership model. We will keep fans up to date on any decisions that are being considered."



Storm chief executive Dave Donaghy said the proposed ownership model offers more than just pride to the supporters, as it may give the club an advantage in the competitive Melbourne sports marketplace.

"If the interest is there to at some point ideally have fans own Melbourne Storm … we think [it] will provide the Storm with a real competitive advantage over the opposition," he said.

"It's quite unique for fans. Obviously in AFL, their fans are incredibly passionate about their club but they can't actually become owners.

"In this case, we're Melbourne's rugby league team and if the interest is there, there will hopefully be a way where fans can buy their way into the Storm.

"If anything else, it's a really cool initiative we're looking to explore. Hopefully Melbourne and rugby league fans see an interest in it."

What is the Packers' ownership model?

The Packers, based in the Wisconsin city of Green Bay, work under a system in which they are owned by over 361,169 shareholders — representing 5,009,562 shares — according to the club's website.

The two-time Super Bowl champions have been a publicly owned non-profit corporation since 1923 and are governed by a shareholder-elected board of directors, who appoint a seven-member executive committee.

There have been five stock offerings during their history, with the most recent — ending in 2012 — seeing more than 250,000 new shareholders come on board and in excess of 269,000 shares sold at $US250 ($352) each to earn around $90.3 million.

Shareholders do not gain a dividend on what they invest.

The Packers are permitted to operate outside of NFL ownership rules, which state one owner must own at least a third of the franchise.

The success of the Packers, who have also won numerous conference championships, is remarkable considering Green Bay has a population of just over 105,000.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-04/m ... l/10337668


Tigerdon
Member
Member
Posts: 3966
Joined: Mon 07 Apr, 2014 11:07 am
Location: Manly

Post by Tigerdon » Thu 04 Oct, 2018 5:37 pm

I could see that working in Melbourne.
Does the Storm have a club house?
Or somewhere for general meetings.
in Ivan we distrust

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 40842
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm

Post by happy tiger » Thu 04 Oct, 2018 6:52 pm

The WTF could buy the Storm ..........

Would we own the players ...................

Would we own Bellamy .......................

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29294
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Thu 04 Oct, 2018 7:06 pm

Interesting article, I thought about this for WTs...

...for about 30 seconds.

Naah

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 40842
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm

Post by happy tiger » Thu 04 Oct, 2018 7:10 pm

innsaneink wrote:
Thu 04 Oct, 2018 7:06 pm
Interesting article, I thought about this for WTs...

...for about 30 seconds.

Naah
Yeah you could really pick up some cheap shares at times

Especially looking at some of the bandwagoners on here


bathursttiger
Member
Member
Posts: 2784
Joined: Thu 02 Dec, 2010 5:21 pm

Post by bathursttiger » Thu 04 Oct, 2018 7:44 pm

Maybe we should buy the WT, and then we can sack Ivan and put an end to this mess.

Fade To Black
Member
Member
Posts: 5498
Joined: Tue 21 Feb, 2012 5:51 pm

Post by Fade To Black » Sat 06 Oct, 2018 4:02 am

happy tiger wrote:
Thu 04 Oct, 2018 7:10 pm
innsaneink wrote:
Thu 04 Oct, 2018 7:06 pm
Interesting article, I thought about this for WTs...

...for about 30 seconds.

Naah
Yeah you could really pick up some cheap shares at times

Especially looking at some of the bandwagoners on here
Who are the bandwagoners? Coming from a bloke that threw in the towel on the WT over the Tedesco bail-out (and fan backlash) that's a bit rich isn't it? Most of us are here, and have been, in for the long haul.

User avatar
oldprop
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue 24 Nov, 2015 4:06 pm
Location: Springwood

Post by oldprop » Sat 06 Oct, 2018 10:57 am

bathursttiger wrote:
Thu 04 Oct, 2018 7:44 pm
Maybe we should buy the WT, and then we can sack Ivan and put an end to this mess.
Problem is he has a contract which we would have to pay out if we sack him.
Need more props.

Post Reply