NRL taking on players' managers

NRL and other Australian Rugby League Discussion
Post Reply
Byron Bay Fan
Member
Member
Posts: 4931
Joined: Sat 17 Oct, 2015 2:14 pm

NRL taking on players' managers

Post by Byron Bay Fan » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 2:05 am

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/agents ... 509pt.html

A bitter battle looms — as brutal as any during the Super League war — between the NRL administration and player managers over Rugby League Central’s plans to reform the agent accreditation system.

The code’s 110 accredited player managers have formed a union and have threatened legal action to resist the administration’s attempts to make them accountable to the same NRL rules by which players and officials must abide.


Making change: NRL COO Nick Weeks and CEO Todd Greenberg.CREDIT:BEN RUSHTON

The agents insist on retaining the current system of self-regulation.

A meeting at RL Central on Monday, attended by only a handful of agents, ended with NRL chief operating officer Nick Weeks reiterating that the commitment to reform across the game was widespread and insisting the strength of resolve at NRL headquarters was very strong.

A similar meeting will be held in Brisbane on Tuesday.

"There’s a smash-up coming," one official said. "It’s driven by the contest between our desire to fix a system of agent accreditation that is clearly broken, and the will of agents to retain a system of self-regulation under which they remain unaccountable."

Negotiations between Weeks and the agents over reform began early this year but resulted in the agents combining to form their own union to fight it. They withdrew from negotiations last month and the majority have refused to engage on the substance of the reform since. Instead, they have engaged lawyers and threatened to seek an injunction to stop any attempts to submit them to jurisdiction under NRL rules. NRL clubs and the RLPA support the administration’s insistence on replacing the current system where the NRL has only one vote on the seven-man committee regulating the action of agents.

The one constant question throughout 2018, during meetings between NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg, Weeks and the NRL’s 16 clubs, has been: "When are you going to fix the agent accreditation scheme?" Under the proposed reform, the NRL and RLPA would take joint control of the accreditation and discipline process, dismantling the current committee where agents have three representatives.

No agent has been accountable for the salary cap breaches at Parramatta and Manly. Seven club officials were thrown out of the game and $1.75m in fines were imposed on the two clubs, but no player agent has been disciplined for his involvement in facilitating the deals that breached the cap.

The inability of the game to investigate or sanction agents for their conduct in these large-scale salary cap matters undermines the credibility of the sport. It also tars all agents with the same brush as their unscrupulous colleagues. Agents extract about $10m a year from the code’s economy, a sum equivalent to the salary cap of one NRL club.

Over the past 15 years, player salaries have compounded at a rate of 10 per cent per year while player managers have put their hands out for 7 per cent commission.

While some have a genuine desire to enhance the professional and emotional advancement of players, many have a client list so long they cannot possibly service them all.

Of the NRL’s 110 accredited agents, less than 20 have viable businesses.

Of the 5000 players they represent, only about 500 are professional rugby league players. The balance is made up primarily of under-age players. While the legal action to injunct the NRL’s reform plan is being funded by the biggest earning agents, the fight is being led by the old-school managers who have benefited from self-regulation the past 15 years.

Many of the younger agents support a new scheme. They want reform and an opportunity to compete on a level playing field. Obviously, the NRL administration will hope some of these agents splinter away from those who oppose the scheme.

The NRL insists the reform process is not about reducing the fees that agents can charge but rather ensuring they provide a professional service.

A significant problem with the current system is that it allows agents to sign fixed term agency contracts that provide no opportunity for player to get out of the deal. This is unprecedented in Australian and global sport. There are cases where players have signed 10-year contracts (effectively a lifetime deal for a player) with no opportunity to break that deal if the player wants to leave because he is unhappy with the service. The reform model would continue to allow long-term deals but would grant a player or agent a reasonable opportunity to extract himself from the relationship.
In June last year, the current seven-person accreditation committee introduced a rule which allowed a player to terminate the contractual relationship with an agent who is sanctioned for a breach of its rules. However, any management agreement signed before June 2017 was quarantined from this rule.

Furthermore, with no agents sanctioned in the past two and a half years, the rule has proved meaningless.

Roy Masters is a Sports Columnist for The Sydney Morning Herald.
Malcolm Knox: What has happened this week is a pity for the Tigers, a pity for Jason Taylor and a pity for Robbie Farah, who had achieved more than the Big Four put together but was somehow turned into collateral damage. (SMH 25-26 March, 2017)


supercoach
Member
Member
Posts: 7164
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 2:38 pm

Post by supercoach » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 6:53 am

If we can get scum like Issac Moses out of league I am all for the NRL pushing ahead with their reform. Be interesting if the NRL get their way, if a few teams start to struggle all of a sudden with their recruitment

jadtiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 3483
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 8:12 am
Location: bayview

Post by jadtiger » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 7:06 am

I will believe in the Easter Bunny Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy before the NRL clean up any of the mess they have allowed to fester over the years.There are more shady deals and brown paper bags than there ever has been.
Yes i am very cynical

User avatar
Chicken Faced Killa
Member
Member
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon 17 Apr, 2017 8:19 pm

Post by Chicken Faced Killa » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 7:10 am

Key to this is getting the players on board. Do that and the mangers don’t have a leg to stand on.

User avatar
old man tiger
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 1237
Joined: Tue 14 Jul, 2009 10:37 am

Post by old man tiger » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 8:49 am

Simplest answer is to subsidise commissions for accredited managers for 3 years. Instead of the manager getting 3% from the player(for example), they get 1.5 from the player and 1.5 from tv funding or from the club via a cap exemption.

I know some people don't like market interference, but when you are dealing with a corrupt system you need to ditch the facade of "due process". It's become like game management, a buzzword to excuse the fact that you are ineffective and not good enough.

Get results or resign.


User avatar
Geo.
Member
Member
Posts: 29650
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW..

Post by Geo. » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 9:08 am

Good luck with that Todd...
Wests Tigers don't need a Coach.. The playing group has taken over..
happy tiger wrote:
Thu 25 Oct, 2018 12:17 am

OK I was wrong

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29572
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 9:21 am

supercoach wrote:
Tue 16 Oct, 2018 6:53 am
If we can get scum like Issac Moses out of league I am all for the NRL pushing ahead with their reform. Be interesting if the NRL get their way, if a few teams start to struggle all of a sudden with their recruitment
No surprise it's him and the few like him (that tar all the others) that are opposing this

User avatar
dazza65
Member
Member
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 12:45 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by dazza65 » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 9:41 am

bout time. blight on the game
----------------------------------------------
Tigers?!? - Driven mad since - 1969-201?

User avatar
jirskyr
Member
Member
Posts: 6100
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:00 pm

Post by jirskyr » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 12:58 pm

How can the agents possibly have a legal argument to fight increased oversight from the governing body under which they generate revenue?

It's like saying you want to stage an event at the football stadium, make money off it, but not be subject to the rules and regulations of the stadium authority.

I do appreciate that Roy Masters has taken this on as somewhat of a personal crusade to report, as most journos aren't really keeping abreast of the potential changes to the agent model.

And if the end result is leveling of the agent playing field and toppling a few of the top agents? I reckon 95% of fans are in favour of that.

User avatar
WT2K
Member
Member
Posts: 4113
Joined: Thu 04 May, 2017 5:18 pm

Post by WT2K » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 3:06 pm

Good luck to the nrl... im with you on the reform.
No more plodders!
:sign:

supercoach
Member
Member
Posts: 7164
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 2:38 pm

Post by supercoach » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 3:51 pm

Bit like getting rid of the mafia......it ain’t going to happen.

TCL
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 2250
Joined: Mon 29 Aug, 2016 8:52 am

Post by TCL » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 5:20 pm

If the NRL are serious about any reform the first step has to be to get rid of Greenberg and then subsequently get the players union on board.

The NRL rules should apply to all associated with the code.

User avatar
jirskyr
Member
Member
Posts: 6100
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 12:00 pm

Post by jirskyr » Tue 16 Oct, 2018 7:27 pm

TCL wrote:
Tue 16 Oct, 2018 5:20 pm
If the NRL are serious about any reform the first step has to be to get rid of Greenberg and then subsequently get the players union on board.

The NRL rules should apply to all associated with the code.
I thought the RLPA was already on board?

User avatar
Cultured Bogan
Member
Member
Posts: 18148
Joined: Tue 15 Sep, 2009 11:20 pm
Location: Blue Mountains

Post by Cultured Bogan » Wed 17 Oct, 2018 6:26 pm

Fixed fee commission for securing contracts. Only way that players and agents will stop drawing out negotiations and holding clubs to ransom. When the player's agent doesn't rely on an increase in the contract to determine his commission he'll be more likely to scope out all suitors and press his client to make a decision and waste less time on pushing clubs.
Madge's Maulers.

Cuando llegue el día, y estoy parado a las puertas del cielo, será Dios pidiendo mi perdón...

happy tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 41161
Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm

Post by happy tiger » Wed 17 Oct, 2018 9:16 pm

Why not have the player managers under the employ of the NRL ??

Makes sense and they can watch every move they make

Post Reply