Page 1 of 1

same try, different week...

Posted: Mon 03 Oct, 2011 7:06 pm
by mtd
manly had a try disallowed because of the separation between hand and ball when in the motion of placing the footy on the ground.

it was the exact same as inu's try, they just looked at the replay a few more times in the GF and got it right.

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Tue 04 Oct, 2011 4:32 pm
by innsaneink
let






it









go

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Tue 04 Oct, 2011 4:50 pm
by Cultured Bogan
innsaneink wrote:let






it









go
x1

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Tue 04 Oct, 2011 5:01 pm
by underdog
Cultured Bogan wrote:
innsaneink wrote:let






it









go
x1
I see what you did there. :mrgreen:

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Wed 05 Oct, 2011 12:30 am
by mtd
im over the loss, it doesn't bother me at all now. we blew our opportunities. but they put us through probably hours of video refereeing decisions all year - in what can often be nothing games. it disappoints me that in a sudden death semi final, a try is score with 3 minutes remaining which determines the outcome of the game and they missing something so simple such as the grounding... in the grand final the exact same sort of try was scored and disallowed... its annoying..

bring in a coaches challenge...

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Wed 05 Oct, 2011 4:20 pm
by innsaneink
I didnt see any seperation....it wasnt mentioned in the call....it was replayed 100's of times that weekend and not mentioned either.

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Wed 05 Oct, 2011 5:17 pm
by imZerroo
lol agreed, just leave it.

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Wed 05 Oct, 2011 5:37 pm
by mtd
so because it wasnt highlighted by the media it basically never happened? laughable... and you call yourselves supporters!

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Wed 05 Oct, 2011 6:15 pm
by imZerroo
so do u think try against us should've been no try
or the try in the grand final should've been a try?

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Thu 06 Oct, 2011 12:26 am
by mtd
imZerroo wrote:so do u think try against us should've been no try
or the try in the grand final should've been a try?
technically they both should have been given no try... the ball hit the ground without a hand on it at one point making it a knock on... but thats only because we can see it after numerous slow motion replays...

i'd prefer it if they get rid of the video referees and brought back in goal touch judges...

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Thu 06 Oct, 2011 12:33 am
by happy tiger
innsaneink wrote:let






it









go
Agree Ink Even I have managed to let it go (JUST)

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Thu 06 Oct, 2011 8:52 pm
by innsaneink
mtd wrote:so because it wasnt highlighted by the media it basically never happened? laughable... and you call yourselves supporters!
It didnt happen
There was NO seperation in Inus try against us.
Thats why it wasnt mentioned or highlited, the same as a flying piano crashing into the southern stand at the SFS at the same time wasnt mentioned, highlited or discussed...because it did not occur.

Re: same try, different week...

Posted: Thu 06 Oct, 2011 9:26 pm
by Jazza
The ball was starting to come loose from Inu but in saying that, there was still no separation, his fingers were still on the ball and there was still downward pressure. So it is still a try.