Same sex marriage debate...

General Social Discussion
User avatar
GNR4LIFE
Member
Member
Posts: 18518
Joined: Mon 28 Feb, 2011 5:57 pm
Has liked: 47 times
Been liked: 158 times

Re: Same sex marriage debate...

Unread post by GNR4LIFE » Wed 04 Oct, 2017 8:07 pm

It's being reported that 77% of votes have been sent back, with the majority having voted yes.


Byron Bay Fan
Member
Member
Posts: 3646
Joined: Sat 17 Oct, 2015 2:14 pm
Has liked: 28 times
Been liked: 30 times

Unread post by Byron Bay Fan » Thu 05 Oct, 2017 12:34 am

Earl wrote:
Wed 04 Oct, 2017 3:37 pm
There shouldn't have been a plebiscite. It's a human right to be married and discrimination against gay people isn't cool.

The government should show some balls and just pass it.
to quote Basil Faulty the government would have to stitch them back on first
Malcolm Knox: What has happened this week is a pity for the Tigers, a pity for Jason Taylor and a pity for Robbie Farah, who had achieved more than the Big Four put together but was somehow turned into collateral damage. (SMH 25-26 March, 2017)

User avatar
innsaneink
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 25030
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....
Has liked: 176 times
Been liked: 138 times

Unread post by innsaneink » Wed 18 Oct, 2017 5:32 pm

stryker wrote:
Sun 24 Sep, 2017 1:25 am
jirskyr wrote:
Sun 24 Sep, 2017 12:35 am
stryker wrote:
Sat 23 Sep, 2017 7:32 pm
There are some shocking bigots in this thread...
Yossarian
Gnr4life
Earl
Jirskyr
Look in the mirror you hypocrites.
What's happened to you stryker? You've lost your edge. I remember you used to have some clever stuff to say, amongst generally being an obnoxious twit, one of the reasons I didn't foe you ages ago.

But your contributions to this thread are shockingly uninspired, calling people out and spraying insults around like a dog in a field of tree stumps.

I suppose you felt some need to stir people up, I don't get it, but it must be something you need to do. You must be a real joy at social functions.
Just calling it as I see it. Ive had to lower myself to certain peoples levels recently. Glad you noticed. Ill be clever again soon.
Famous last words...LOL

goldcoast tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat 12 Apr, 2014 5:42 pm
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 46 times

Unread post by goldcoast tiger » Wed 18 Oct, 2017 6:32 pm

Byron Bay Fan wrote:
Thu 05 Oct, 2017 12:34 am
Earl wrote:
Wed 04 Oct, 2017 3:37 pm
There shouldn't have been a plebiscite. It's a human right to be married and discrimination against gay people isn't cool.

The government should show some balls and just pass it.
to quote Basil Faulty the government would have to stitch them back on first

That way would mean that the Govt. Would have to face their own supporters, and probably be whacked even harder by the extreme right, than it looks like they are going to be anyway.
This way they can hide behind the survey result, and blame everybody else

They don't care about wasting a few millionson on a survey, Turnbulls mob couldn't worry about how much it cost, and if it does worry any of them, Bronnie will probably hire a jet or a helicopter and fly them to some luxurious place to recuperate

We have to look after these precious little luvvies.
A month or two away should be enough. By then the grass will need mowing at the wives houses. ( you know the ones that they rent to their husbands while they're in the grind of working there, )
Still, it's all blue skies for hem. After all they can look forward to saving their $2 per week on their power bills.
Sorry that's right, they have to wait another two years before getting that. ........isn't that after the next Election and I wonder , if they Win, will that massive sum of S2 be stopped so that their pay can go up a thousand a week or so instead.
Naaaarrrgh.... that wouldn't happen!!
Just getting cynical..

User avatar
Harvey
Member
Member
Posts: 2478
Joined: Mon 22 Jun, 2015 10:01 pm
Location: Leumeah
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 58 times

Unread post by Harvey » Fri 20 Oct, 2017 4:34 pm

I responded to the question explaining that I hardly know the person that sent it, but if they were to send a photo it might help me decide


User avatar
Kul
Member
Member
Posts: 5738
Joined: Sat 04 Jul, 2009 12:24 am
Location: Balmain
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 16 times

Unread post by Kul » Fri 20 Oct, 2017 5:16 pm

#voteYes

everett8
Member
Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed 08 Mar, 2017 12:27 pm
Been liked: 4 times

Unread post by everett8 » Fri 20 Oct, 2017 7:31 pm

Can't wait to this matter is resolved as we have bigger things for the Govt to focus on.

I voted "Yes" as IMO it is a question about human rights and I don't believe we have the right to deprive two people of the right to get married.

Most Australians lives will not change with the decision.

The world needs more love anyway and as a proud parent you want your children no matter what sexuality they are to have equal rights.

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”