Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here

General Social Discussion
User avatar
Geo.
Forum Suppoter
Forum Suppoter
Posts: 24998
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:55 pm
Location: Sandy Point NSW.
Has liked: 227 times
Been liked: 347 times

Re: Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here

Unread post by Geo. » Sun 29 Oct, 2017 7:03 am

And here I thought the X-Men documentary proved Magneto did it...
Ivan's Laws

1. You are either on the Bus or you are off..
2. The Star of the Team is the Team
3. Be the player your teammates want to play with..
Tiger Watto wrote:
Fri 03 Nov, 2017 8:07 am
Geo nailed it...


goldcoast tiger
Member
Member
Posts: 5412
Joined: Sat 12 Apr, 2014 5:42 pm
Has liked: 34 times
Been liked: 57 times

Unread post by goldcoast tiger » Sun 29 Oct, 2017 8:57 am

hammertime wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:11 pm
goldcoast tiger wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:17 am
To those who think the court decision is a waste of time, would they feel so benovelent if it was half a dozen Labour Pollies who got caught.
Turnbull has egg all over him ( again) for thinking that he could pick and choose which laws he could obey, and which ones he could ignore.
For him and the And the Nationals to hold out , and make it go to the high court shows their contempt towards those of us who are expected to obey all laws, whether we are aware of them or otherwise.
My only problem with it is that these people have been getting a bucketful of Taxpayers money , and will continue to do so, while they were in the parliament and voting on MANY
bills over the years.
They were not even eligible to be there!!!!!
They were taking( knowingly or not) money under illegal circumstances.
And should have to pay it back!!!
Any of us in those circumstances would have to. Wages , super, the whole lot.

Labour is Nuts if they don't use this to the hilt.
Imagine Abbot and Turnbull getting this free kick.
They'd go for the throat.
Shorten needs to do the same to them
Unfortunately Joyce will get back in, but the money he's acrued illegally shoul be paid back .
Turnbull is really squirming with this and the Cash bungle, both these things are going to hurt him for quite a long while
You've lost the plot cgt. If you really think this is a significant issue, some obscure rule that no one knew about, then the only thing it highlights is an incredible bias on your behalf.

The thing about you suggesting they paying years of wages back, when these guys have families to look after, is just stone dead cold. Why don't you go and take the food back out of his kids mouths?

Man, there are bigger things to worry about in this world than what amounts to basically admin errors!
As I first asked, would you out be so benevolent if it was the Labour Party under the gun.
As ignorance of the law is no defence when it's a normal citizen , Why shouldn't that apply to Pollies as well.
Do you think that because you don't think it's important , that it's ok to brush it under the carpet.
Remember, it was Turnbull who took it to the HC, hoping to rope some Labour Pollies as well.
Turnbull should of sacked them immediately , even if it was simply for being idiots. As for them and their families , that's for them to sort out.
Morons like that don't deserve to be voting on important decisions in the Parliament.
If they can't remember what country they are citizens of , they dont deserve to be there.
Plain Stupid

Why should we be paying Money to people who can't even keep their own lives sorted, let alone ours.
How many decisions have been made on illegal votes.?
This lot weren't just illegal last week.
They've been illegal ever since they were elected,
Why shouldn't they pay back money obtained illegally?

Pawsandclaws
Member
Member
Posts: 2367
Joined: Sat 20 Jun, 2015 5:53 pm
Been liked: 54 times

Unread post by Pawsandclaws » Sun 29 Oct, 2017 11:20 am

hammertime wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:11 pm
goldcoast tiger wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:17 am
To those who think the court decision is a waste of time, would they feel so benovelent if it was half a dozen Labour Pollies who got caught.
Turnbull has egg all over him ( again) for thinking that he could pick and choose which laws he could obey, and which ones he could ignore.
For him and the And the Nationals to hold out , and make it go to the high court shows their contempt towards those of us who are expected to obey all laws, whether we are aware of them or otherwise.
My only problem with it is that these people have been getting a bucketful of Taxpayers money , and will continue to do so, while they were in the parliament and voting on MANY
bills over the years.
They were not even eligible to be there!!!!!
They were taking( knowingly or not) money under illegal circumstances.
And should have to pay it back!!!
Any of us in those circumstances would have to. Wages , super, the whole lot.

Labour is Nuts if they don't use this to the hilt.
Imagine Abbot and Turnbull getting this free kick.
They'd go for the throat.
Shorten needs to do the same to them
Unfortunately Joyce will get back in, but the money he's acrued illegally shoul be paid back .
Turnbull is really squirming with this and the Cash bungle, both these things are going to hurt him for quite a long while
You've lost the plot cgt. If you really think this is a significant issue, some obscure rule that no one knew about, then the only thing it highlights is an incredible bias on your behalf.

The thing about you suggesting they paying years of wages back, when these guys have families to look after, is just stone dead cold. Why don't you go and take the food back out of his kids mouths?

Man, there are bigger things to worry about in this world than what amounts to basically admin errors!
Turnbull and the squaddies were vocal about the 2 Greens' Senators paying back the salaries they had been paid when ineligible to sit in Parliament. Now that the Conservatives have been exposed, there is hushed silence from Turnbull and Co.

User avatar
hammertime
Member
Member
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sat 26 Sep, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Rozelle, NSW
Has liked: 27 times
Been liked: 23 times

Unread post by hammertime » Sun 29 Oct, 2017 3:51 pm

Pawsandclaws wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 11:20 am
hammertime wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:11 pm
goldcoast tiger wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:17 am
To those who think the court decision is a waste of time, would they feel so benovelent if it was half a dozen Labour Pollies who got caught.
Turnbull has egg all over him ( again) for thinking that he could pick and choose which laws he could obey, and which ones he could ignore.
For him and the And the Nationals to hold out , and make it go to the high court shows their contempt towards those of us who are expected to obey all laws, whether we are aware of them or otherwise.
My only problem with it is that these people have been getting a bucketful of Taxpayers money , and will continue to do so, while they were in the parliament and voting on MANY
bills over the years.
They were not even eligible to be there!!!!!
They were taking( knowingly or not) money under illegal circumstances.
And should have to pay it back!!!
Any of us in those circumstances would have to. Wages , super, the whole lot.

Labour is Nuts if they don't use this to the hilt.
Imagine Abbot and Turnbull getting this free kick.
They'd go for the throat.
Shorten needs to do the same to them
Unfortunately Joyce will get back in, but the money he's acrued illegally shoul be paid back .
Turnbull is really squirming with this and the Cash bungle, both these things are going to hurt him for quite a long while
You've lost the plot cgt. If you really think this is a significant issue, some obscure rule that no one knew about, then the only thing it highlights is an incredible bias on your behalf.

The thing about you suggesting they paying years of wages back, when these guys have families to look after, is just stone dead cold. Why don't you go and take the food back out of his kids mouths?

Man, there are bigger things to worry about in this world than what amounts to basically admin errors!
Turnbull and the squaddies were vocal about the 2 Greens' Senators paying back the salaries they had been paid when ineligible to sit in Parliament. Now that the Conservatives have been exposed, there is hushed silence from Turnbull and Co.
You know what guys, I apologise. I actually agree with you now. I hadn't seen Turnbull's quotes on the matter about the Greens - what an absolute dropkick. I hate to say it, but he has to be nearly on last legs.

Even if it's opposition that he's trying to take down, it's just pure in-human like attacking someone like that when they've worked hard. You're talking about taking back years of salary from them for an error like that. No workplace anywhere would work like that!

Man our country is stuffed though if we keep turning over leaders like this.

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9115
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 107 times

Unread post by Yossarian » Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:04 pm

kevinmcguiness wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 12:44 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 9:42 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 6:24 pm
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:20 am

Please.

On the info that's being declassified, whoopdy doo. Nothing that's being now released is going to be groundbreaking. Besides, any info that's released is only info that the Governmemt have had over 50 years to doctor to their liking.
I doubt anything would convince you. Anyone whose studied the evidence and has investigate training will tell you Oswald did it and the evidence stacks up. Well most of them anyway.
As I'm sure anything I could present would not convince you. I'm sure you'd just say I'm a conspiracy nut.
Yoss, would you seriously like me to go through all the hard evidence? this thread would be hijacked. i doubt you'd still be convinced. you would have to be very very naive to think the president could be assassinated without help from an agency. William Greer stopped the limo, you can see it on youtube.

Yes, there were at least 8 shooters:
You brought it up. All that rubbish about Bush.

Greer didn't stop the car. It was always moving.

Of course I won't be convinced - my background is in criminal investigation. I deal with facts not conjecture. People saw Oswald in that window. There's no reliable evidence to support any other shooter. Not a single other person.

That video is pathetic - based on their yellow line the "shooter" must have been a midget in a drain. Greer screwed up but anyone who thinks he shot JFK is living in fantasy land.


User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9115
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 107 times

Unread post by Yossarian » Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:10 pm

Geo. wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 7:03 am
And here I thought the X-Men documentary proved Magneto did it...
It would be more realistic than most of the theories.

Magnus
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon 16 Oct, 2017 7:04 pm
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 4 times

Unread post by Magnus » Sun 29 Oct, 2017 5:59 pm

Yossarian wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:04 pm
kevinmcguiness wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 12:44 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 9:42 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 6:24 pm


I doubt anything would convince you. Anyone whose studied the evidence and has investigate training will tell you Oswald did it and the evidence stacks up. Well most of them anyway.
As I'm sure anything I could present would not convince you. I'm sure you'd just say I'm a conspiracy nut.
Yoss, would you seriously like me to go through all the hard evidence? this thread would be hijacked. i doubt you'd still be convinced. you would have to be very very naive to think the president could be assassinated without help from an agency. William Greer stopped the limo, you can see it on youtube.

Yes, there were at least 8 shooters:
You brought it up. All that rubbish about Bush.

Greer didn't stop the car. It was always moving.

Of course I won't be convinced - my background is in criminal investigation. I deal with facts not conjecture. People saw Oswald in that window. There's no reliable evidence to support any other shooter. Not a single other person.

That video is pathetic - based on their yellow line the "shooter" must have been a midget in a drain. Greer screwed up but anyone who thinks he shot JFK is living in fantasy land.
I don't get it, if lho did it and he was behind JFK @ the depository why did JFKs head move violently backwards. Doesn't make any sense.

tsjonathan
Member
Member
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sun 21 Mar, 2010 6:04 pm
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 10 times

Unread post by tsjonathan » Sun 29 Oct, 2017 6:56 pm

Magnus wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 5:59 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:04 pm
kevinmcguiness wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 12:44 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 9:42 pm

As I'm sure anything I could present would not convince you. I'm sure you'd just say I'm a conspiracy nut.
Yoss, would you seriously like me to go through all the hard evidence? this thread would be hijacked. i doubt you'd still be convinced. you would have to be very very naive to think the president could be assassinated without help from an agency. William Greer stopped the limo, you can see it on youtube.

Yes, there were at least 8 shooters:
You brought it up. All that rubbish about Bush.

Greer didn't stop the car. It was always moving.

Of course I won't be convinced - my background is in criminal investigation. I deal with facts not conjecture. People saw Oswald in that window. There's no reliable evidence to support any other shooter. Not a single other person.

That video is pathetic - based on their yellow line the "shooter" must have been a midget in a drain. Greer screwed up but anyone who thinks h
e shot JFK is living in fantasy land.
I don't get it, if lho did it and he was behind JFK @ the depository why did JFKs head move violently backwards. Doesn't make any sense.
Nightcrawler teleported Oswald from behind to the front

User avatar
Cultured Bogan
Member
Member
Posts: 16112
Joined: Tue 15 Sep, 2009 11:20 pm
Location: Blue Mountains
Has liked: 67 times
Been liked: 138 times

Unread post by Cultured Bogan » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 9:05 am

hammertime wrote:
Fri 27 Oct, 2017 8:27 pm
formerguest wrote:
Fri 27 Oct, 2017 5:20 pm
hammertime wrote:
Fri 27 Oct, 2017 4:48 pm
So Barnaby has been kicked out + 4 others. Man this is a massive waste of tax dollars.
All because their parties have/had inadequate procedures in place. Apart from that already expended and with the by election to come, the decision to not stand Joyce aside, particularly from his ministerial roles, could prove very costly indeed.

In the meantime, we have drugs and guns potentially flooding into our country following funding being cut to be diverted to things such as SSM surveys and multiple energy reports that are rejected by a few powerful climate deniers.
Mate, no offence, but you really are one-eyed.
In reference to FG's first paragraph, I fail to see where they are wrong. The Greens, One Nation and Nationals all got stung. The Liberals and ALP didn't have anyone pinged which suggests they have extensive vetting procedures or are quite good at burying information. Since the Nats are in coalition with the Libs, you'd have thought they would have done their due diligence and ensured their Nats counterparts (especially the deputy PM,) would be compliant with the election rules as laid out as per the constitution.

Not knowing is not a legitimate defence. If I get pinged by a speed camera I can't claim that I didn't know I was speeding.
John Wayne would never use a surge protector!

Fuerza en la adversidad.

magpiecol
Member
Member
Posts: 2737
Joined: Mon 13 Jul, 2009 3:02 pm
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 18 times

Unread post by magpiecol » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 9:07 am

Where are Scully and Mulder when you need them?

User avatar
Cultured Bogan
Member
Member
Posts: 16112
Joined: Tue 15 Sep, 2009 11:20 pm
Location: Blue Mountains
Has liked: 67 times
Been liked: 138 times

Unread post by Cultured Bogan » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 9:09 am

hammertime wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 3:51 pm
Pawsandclaws wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 11:20 am
hammertime wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:11 pm
goldcoast tiger wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 8:17 am
To those who think the court decision is a waste of time, would they feel so benovelent if it was half a dozen Labour Pollies who got caught.
Turnbull has egg all over him ( again) for thinking that he could pick and choose which laws he could obey, and which ones he could ignore.
For him and the And the Nationals to hold out , and make it go to the high court shows their contempt towards those of us who are expected to obey all laws, whether we are aware of them or otherwise.
My only problem with it is that these people have been getting a bucketful of Taxpayers money , and will continue to do so, while they were in the parliament and voting on MANY
bills over the years.
They were not even eligible to be there!!!!!
They were taking( knowingly or not) money under illegal circumstances.
And should have to pay it back!!!
Any of us in those circumstances would have to. Wages , super, the whole lot.

Labour is Nuts if they don't use this to the hilt.
Imagine Abbot and Turnbull getting this free kick.
They'd go for the throat.
Shorten needs to do the same to them
Unfortunately Joyce will get back in, but the money he's acrued illegally shoul be paid back .
Turnbull is really squirming with this and the Cash bungle, both these things are going to hurt him for quite a long while
You've lost the plot cgt. If you really think this is a significant issue, some obscure rule that no one knew about, then the only thing it highlights is an incredible bias on your behalf.

The thing about you suggesting they paying years of wages back, when these guys have families to look after, is just stone dead cold. Why don't you go and take the food back out of his kids mouths?

Man, there are bigger things to worry about in this world than what amounts to basically admin errors!
Turnbull and the squaddies were vocal about the 2 Greens' Senators paying back the salaries they had been paid when ineligible to sit in Parliament. Now that the Conservatives have been exposed, there is hushed silence from Turnbull and Co.
You know what guys, I apologise. I actually agree with you now. I hadn't seen Turnbull's quotes on the matter about the Greens - what an absolute dropkick. I hate to say it, but he has to be nearly on last legs.

Even if it's opposition that he's trying to take down, it's just pure in-human like attacking someone like that when they've worked hard. You're talking about taking back years of salary from them for an error like that. No workplace anywhere would work like that!

Man our country is stuffed though if we keep turning over leaders like this.
We get the governments we deserve Hammer. Government since Howard has been elected on the basis of instant gratification. The parties merely react to this by pandering to the electorate. That's why leaders have been replaced of late. It's a symptom of a larger problem.
John Wayne would never use a surge protector!

Fuerza en la adversidad.

Byron Bay Fan
Member
Member
Posts: 3823
Joined: Sat 17 Oct, 2015 2:14 pm
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 49 times

Unread post by Byron Bay Fan » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 10:16 am

magpiecol wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 9:07 am
Where are Scully and Mulder when you need them?
Gee magpie you are turning the clock back, Billy Scully died in March 1966 and he wasn't spectacular?
Malcolm Knox: What has happened this week is a pity for the Tigers, a pity for Jason Taylor and a pity for Robbie Farah, who had achieved more than the Big Four put together but was somehow turned into collateral damage. (SMH 25-26 March, 2017)

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9115
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 107 times

Unread post by Yossarian » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 11:39 am

Magnus wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 5:59 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:04 pm
kevinmcguiness wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 12:44 am
GNR4LIFE wrote:
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 9:42 pm

As I'm sure anything I could present would not convince you. I'm sure you'd just say I'm a conspiracy nut.
Yoss, would you seriously like me to go through all the hard evidence? this thread would be hijacked. i doubt you'd still be convinced. you would have to be very very naive to think the president could be assassinated without help from an agency. William Greer stopped the limo, you can see it on youtube.

Yes, there were at least 8 shooters:
You brought it up. All that rubbish about Bush.

Greer didn't stop the car. It was always moving.

Of course I won't be convinced - my background is in criminal investigation. I deal with facts not conjecture. People saw Oswald in that window. There's no reliable evidence to support any other shooter. Not a single other person.

That video is pathetic - based on their yellow line the "shooter" must have been a midget in a drain. Greer screwed up but anyone who thinks he shot JFK is living in fantasy land.
I don't get it, if lho did it and he was behind JFK @ the depository why did JFKs head move violently backwards. Doesn't make any sense.
Because it jerks forward slightly then snaps back violently. That's what happens. But this man can explain it better.

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/macpher.htm

And these guys too:

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/headwnd.htm

Magnus
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon 16 Oct, 2017 7:04 pm
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 4 times

Unread post by Magnus » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 12:07 pm

Yossarian wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 11:39 am
Magnus wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 5:59 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:04 pm
kevinmcguiness wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 12:44 am


Yoss, would you seriously like me to go through all the hard evidence? this thread would be hijacked. i doubt you'd still be convinced. you would have to be very very naive to think the president could be assassinated without help from an agency. William Greer stopped the limo, you can see it on youtube.

Yes, there were at least 8 shooters:
You brought it up. All that rubbish about Bush.

Greer didn't stop the car. It was always moving.

Of course I won't be convinced - my background is in criminal investigation. I deal with facts not conjecture. People saw Oswald in that window. There's no reliable evidence to support any other shooter. Not a single other person.

That video is pathetic - based on their yellow line the "shooter" must have been a midget in a drain. Greer screwed up but anyone who thinks he shot JFK is living in fantasy land.
I don't get it, if lho did it and he was behind JFK @ the depository why did JFKs head move violently backwards. Doesn't make any sense.
Because it jerks forward slightly then snaps back violently. That's what happens. But this man can explain it better.

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/macpher.htm

And these guys too:

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/headwnd.htm
i dont know who shot jfk but his head rocks backwards. That link didn't explain much though. Looks like his head rocks back 2 metres back...

has anyone ever fired an archaic 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle? Is it a solid gun to fire 3/4 shots in about 3 seconds?

Magnus
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon 16 Oct, 2017 7:04 pm
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 4 times

Unread post by Magnus » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 12:10 pm

Yossarian wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 11:39 am
Magnus wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 5:59 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:04 pm
kevinmcguiness wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 12:44 am


Yoss, would you seriously like me to go through all the hard evidence? this thread would be hijacked. i doubt you'd still be convinced. you would have to be very very naive to think the president could be assassinated without help from an agency. William Greer stopped the limo, you can see it on youtube.

Yes, there were at least 8 shooters:
You brought it up. All that rubbish about Bush.

Greer didn't stop the car. It was always moving.

Of course I won't be convinced - my background is in criminal investigation. I deal with facts not conjecture. People saw Oswald in that window. There's no reliable evidence to support any other shooter. Not a single other person.

That video is pathetic - based on their yellow line the "shooter" must have been a midget in a drain. Greer screwed up but anyone who thinks he shot JFK is living in fantasy land.
I don't get it, if lho did it and he was behind JFK @ the depository why did JFKs head move violently backwards. Doesn't make any sense.
Because it jerks forward slightly then snaps back violently. That's what happens. But this man can explain it better.

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/macpher.htm

And these guys too:

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/headwnd.htm
actually you are correct, his head does move forward first but then another bullet comes and his head moves back. Interesting stuff, so he must have had shooters from both sides

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/headshot.htm

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9115
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 107 times

Unread post by Yossarian » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 12:27 pm

Magnus wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 12:07 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 11:39 am
Magnus wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 5:59 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:04 pm


You brought it up. All that rubbish about Bush.

Greer didn't stop the car. It was always moving.

Of course I won't be convinced - my background is in criminal investigation. I deal with facts not conjecture. People saw Oswald in that window. There's no reliable evidence to support any other shooter. Not a single other person.

That video is pathetic - based on their yellow line the "shooter" must have been a midget in a drain. Greer screwed up but anyone who thinks he shot JFK is living in fantasy land.
I don't get it, if lho did it and he was behind JFK @ the depository why did JFKs head move violently backwards. Doesn't make any sense.
Because it jerks forward slightly then snaps back violently. That's what happens. But this man can explain it better.

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/macpher.htm

And these guys too:

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/headwnd.htm
i dont know who shot jfk but his head rocks backwards. That link didn't explain much though. Looks like his head rocks back 2 metres back...

has anyone ever fired an archaic 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle? Is it a solid gun to fire 3/4 shots in about 3 seconds?
Yes lots of people. They even fired the actual rifle. 3 seconds? More like 8.

User avatar
Yossarian
Member
Member
Posts: 9115
Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Central Coast
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 107 times

Unread post by Yossarian » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 12:34 pm

Magnus wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 12:10 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 11:39 am
Magnus wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 5:59 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 4:04 pm


You brought it up. All that rubbish about Bush.

Greer didn't stop the car. It was always moving.

Of course I won't be convinced - my background is in criminal investigation. I deal with facts not conjecture. People saw Oswald in that window. There's no reliable evidence to support any other shooter. Not a single other person.

That video is pathetic - based on their yellow line the "shooter" must have been a midget in a drain. Greer screwed up but anyone who thinks he shot JFK is living in fantasy land.
I don't get it, if lho did it and he was behind JFK @ the depository why did JFKs head move violently backwards. Doesn't make any sense.
Because it jerks forward slightly then snaps back violently. That's what happens. But this man can explain it better.

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/macpher.htm

And these guys too:

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/headwnd.htm
actually you are correct, his head does move forward first but then another bullet comes and his head moves back. Interesting stuff, so he must have had shooters from both sides

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/headshot.htm
Did you read the sources from my last post? That's from scientist familiar with ballistics not guys on the Internet. They clearly and very precisely explain why the Newton law doesn't apply. Thinking that movement in one direction means force from the opposite side is debunked by anyone with training or experience in that field.

Magnus
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon 16 Oct, 2017 7:04 pm
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 4 times

Unread post by Magnus » Mon 30 Oct, 2017 1:16 pm

Yossarian wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 12:34 pm
Magnus wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 12:10 pm
Yossarian wrote:
Mon 30 Oct, 2017 11:39 am
Magnus wrote:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 5:59 pm


I don't get it, if lho did it and he was behind JFK @ the depository why did JFKs head move violently backwards. Doesn't make any sense.
Because it jerks forward slightly then snaps back violently. That's what happens. But this man can explain it better.

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/macpher.htm

And these guys too:

mcadams.posc.mu.edu/headwnd.htm
actually you are correct, his head does move forward first but then another bullet comes and his head moves back. Interesting stuff, so he must have had shooters from both sides

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/headshot.htm
Did you read the sources from my last post? That's from scientist familiar with ballistics not guys on the Internet. They clearly and very precisely explain why the Newton law doesn't apply. Thinking that movement in one direction means force from the opposite side is debunked by anyone with training or experience in that field.
yes I read it and common sense tells me he was shot from in front and behind. Some people really wanted this guy dead. I wouldn't be suprised if there were 10 shooters,

I'm always a bit skeptical of reports from the Government such as the Warren report. I guess we will have to wait and read more of the files when they are released. I read somewhere 9/10 Americans do not believe the Warren report.

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”