Phil Gould

Muffstar · Post by **Muffstar** » Wed 18 Apr, 2012 8:38 pm

I did not think he was supposed to be a commentator when Penrith played ? You could hear the disappointment in his voice. Quite frankly he should not be there as he imo is not fully appreciative of the game when they are losing like they were.

Tbone · Post by **Tbone** » Wed 18 Apr, 2012 8:50 pm

I agree. However I thought he did as good a job as possible in being independent and calling the game without bias. He shouldn't have been put in that situation though.

innsaneink · Post by **innsaneink** » Wed 18 Apr, 2012 9:42 pm

But Rabs HAD to attend the LOGIES!!!

Imo Gus was overly critical of Penrith, he did OK....in fact I liked it better without Rabs

tigersrule4life · Post by **tigersrule4life** » Wed 18 Apr, 2012 10:00 pm

Lol they got pumped what do u expect lol.

milford_magic · Post by **milford_magic** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 1:09 pm

I had no problems with his telecast to be honest.

clifferdSH · Post by **clifferdSH** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 1:11 pm

Yeah I actually enjoyed his commentary. Better when he's not with Rabs

Frank the tank · Post by **Frank the tank** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 2:06 pm

I've always liked Gus, and thought he was alright during the game. But we didn't get a
"GO KEEFY" out of him

dermo · Post by **dermo** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 3:19 pm

I liked how we got a good background of some of the young unknown Panthers, for example I thought it was very interesting to hear they were considering playing the young 5/8 in the back row

GNR4LIFE · Post by **GNR4LIFE** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 3:25 pm

Frank the tank wrote:I've always liked Gus, and thought he was alright during the game. But we didn't get a
"GO KEEFY" out of him

Thank God

MacDougall · Post by **MacDougall** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 3:29 pm

dermo wrote:I liked how we got a good background of some of the young unknown Panthers, for example I thought it was very interesting to hear they were considering playing the young 5/8 in the back row

Austin is a backrower who can play at five-eighth, he's played in the forwards off the bench every time he's played for them this year.

2041 · Post by **2041** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 3:55 pm

I didn't have a problem with him TBH. In fact I actually forgot the link until it popped into my mind during the second half - I certainly didn't think he was favouring Penrith in his commentary.

GNR4LIFE · Post by **GNR4LIFE** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 4:05 pm

2041 wrote:I didn't have a problem with him TBH. In fact I actually forgot the link until it popped into my mind during the second half - I certainly didn't think he was favouring Penrith in his commentary.

Seems to be the general consenus in this thread. I'd wager it would be a different tone if we hadn't won so easily

innsaneink · Post by **innsaneink** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 4:49 pm

tigersrule4life wrote:Lol they got pumped what do u expect lol.

You to miss the point, as expected.

turnstyle · Post by **turnstyle** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 8:07 pm

i agree with the consensus here. i thought he did a very good job, and had read on here he didnt work penrith games before watching. i too thought he was very objective and his comments on penrith surprisingly unbiased.
in a strange twist, with gould always the one getting on my nerves, i think it was shown on the weekend that old mother rabbits is the problem. how old is their constant bickering?!!
btw, who was that commentator? was it ray hadley? because i felt like i was watching a game from 1986 or something?!

darkie · Post by **darkie** » Thu 19 Apr, 2012 11:01 pm

I hate Gould as a commentator, I think he's a PITA, trying to be funny by argueing with Rabs.
I do think he's got a good footy head & enjoy listening to his views, but not when he's trying to be funny.

Wests Tigers Forum

Phil Gould

Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Re: Phil Gould

Connect with your social network account