Live Game Thread #GCTWST

bp tiger · Post by **bp tiger** » Sat 07 Mar, 2015 10:46 pm

Newtown wrote:
Spartan117 wrote:Guy's
Haven't seen the game. But stumbled across the score
Was it as bad as i am assuming
1 point over the titanss that should be in turmoil
I expected. 20 point win

Assessment please

Were we crap. Were they excellent
We showed a lot of character, experience and maturity.

dead set some people are easily pleased, that was terrible, most teams will towel us up on that performance, JT on that effort is no better than Potter.

innsaneink · Post by **innsaneink** » Sat 07 Mar, 2015 11:09 pm

Tigersman wrote:
innsaneink wrote:we got very lucky they didnt rule woods' ''try'' a double movement...which it clearly was...I think richards scored after that
It ain't a double movement if it didn't touch the white line.

It ended up on the white line....after clearly being more than an arms width short.Thats why Badger ruled "TRY" .

innsaneink · Post by **innsaneink** » Sat 07 Mar, 2015 11:10 pm

bp tiger wrote:
Newtown wrote:
Spartan117 wrote:Guy's
Haven't seen the game. But stumbled across the score
Was it as bad as i am assuming
1 point over the titanss that should be in turmoil
I expected. 20 point win

Assessment please

Were we crap. Were they excellent
We showed a lot of character, experience and maturity.
dead set some people are easily pleased, that was terrible, most teams will towel us up on that performance, JT on that effort is no better than Potter.

We have lots to work on

GNR4LIFE · Post by **GNR4LIFE** » Sat 07 Mar, 2015 11:12 pm

Considering people were predicting we'd put 40 on them, the only good thing about it was the competition points.

851 · Post by **851** » Sat 07 Mar, 2015 11:49 pm

innsaneink wrote:
Tigersman wrote:
innsaneink wrote:we got very lucky they didnt rule woods' ''try'' a double movement...which it clearly was...I think richards scored after that
It ain't a double movement if it didn't touch the white line.
It ended up on the white line....after clearly being more than an arms width short.Thats why Badger ruled "TRY" .

No it didn't,his hand that was in front of the ball never made the line.

851 · Post by **851** » Sat 07 Mar, 2015 11:52 pm

We were scrappy and ill disciplined,but we won and showed some ticker in defence,JT said don't expect miracles first few weeks,but we are heading in the right direction.
By around round 6 we should see some real improvement,and all the naysayers might just have to shut up for a while.
There was enough positives for me to feel we are improving,whilst not stoked about tonight,I am quitely confident we will have an ok year.

innsaneink · Post by **innsaneink** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 12:25 am

851 wrote:
innsaneink wrote:
Tigersman wrote:
innsaneink wrote:we got very lucky they didnt rule woods' ''try'' a double movement...which it clearly was...I think richards scored after that
It ain't a double movement if it didn't touch the white line.
It ended up on the white line....after clearly being more than an arms width short.Thats why Badger ruled "TRY" .
No it didn't,his hand that was in front of the ball never made the line.

It ended up on the line...we all saw it

Milky · Post by **Milky** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 12:41 am

innsaneink wrote:
851 wrote:
innsaneink wrote:
Tigersman wrote: It ain't a double movement if it didn't touch the white line.
It ended up on the white line....after clearly being more than an arms width short.Thats why Badger ruled "TRY" .
No it didn't,his hand that was in front of the ball never made the line.
It ended up on the line...we all saw it

No it didn't, Daniel Mortimers hand came over the top at the end, made it look like the ball went forward.

Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.2.3

southerntiger · Post by **southerntiger** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 4:43 am

Double movement?

I think the rule book needs to be brought out.

Where was the promotion of the football?

If there was any movement, and it didnt look like there was, it was momentum.

Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0

innsaneink · Post by **innsaneink** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 7:34 am

Oh well I thought it ended up eventually on the line...after being well short...no point arguing

Tiger In The Gong · Post by **Tiger In The Gong** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 8:00 am

innsaneink wrote:Oh well I thought it ended up eventually on the line...after being well short...no point arguing

I saw it the same as you

Nors05 · Post by **Nors05** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 8:58 am

Simona was excellent. He needs to keep that left centre spot. He has earned it

stevetiger · Post by **stevetiger** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 9:53 am

Nors05 wrote:Simona was excellent. He needs to keep that left centre spot. He has earned it

I think Simona is a gun. He looks dangerous all the time. We need to give him more opportunities.

851 · Post by **851** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 3:36 pm

stevetiger wrote:
Nors05 wrote:Simona was excellent. He needs to keep that left centre spot. He has earned it
I think Simona is a gun. He looks dangerous all the time. We need to give him more opportunities.

He did look good,but geez he always looks injured after being tackled.

Geo. · Post by **Geo.** » Sun 08 Mar, 2015 8:35 pm

I was away this weekend and it is always entertaining reading back through a 'Live' game thread....All I can say is .....Carry ON...next week

foreveratiger · Post by **foreveratiger** » Sat 14 Mar, 2015 2:55 pm

O.K i just caught on this Thread , I don't mean to bring this subject back up But.......

Now please explain ?
I was at the Titans vs Tigers game , so i didn't hear the commentary on Fox or watched the replay of the game afterwards.
The Woods Try ? From what i saw at the game he ruled TRY and sent it to the Video Ref to check what ??? Now i'm guessing the ruling from the video Ref was that he was short ? cause he made us play the ball and if it was a Double Movement? Titans would of got the Penalty .
From the replay they showed at the game there is inconclusive evidence to over rule the opinion of the Ref on the field , how on Earth can the video Ref over rule the Ref on the Field when in his mind being a couple of metres away his deemed that a Try .
Please explain?

PYMBLEPETE · Post by **PYMBLEPETE** » Sun 15 Mar, 2015 12:13 pm

Just like in any video review of a try FT; if the replay clearly shows that the referee's decision was in error. In this case it was crystal clear on replay -doesnt matter how far it was from - that Woods was short of the line.

happy tiger · Post by **happy tiger** » Sun 15 Mar, 2015 12:17 pm

The camera angle was shocking at the game

Have to be one of the worst grounds in that aspect

Wests Tigers Forum