Live Game Thread #GCTWST
- foreveratiger
- Member
- Posts: 11615
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm
Re: Live Game Thread #GCTWST
I disagree , from that camera angle there is no clear evidence to suggest he was short , for that reason he has got to say TRY based on the original Ref's decision on the field.PYMBLEPETE wrote:Just like in any video review of a try FT; if the replay clearly shows that the referee's decision was in error. In this case it was crystal clear on replay -doesnt matter how far it was from - that Woods was short of the line.
The Ref is a metre or 2 from where Woods planted that ball FFS .
I think all the Refs are to scared making there own decisions and send everything up stairs .
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.
Woods was short !foreveratiger wrote:I disagree , from that camera angle there is no clear evidence to suggest he was short , for that reason he has got to say TRY based on the original Ref's decision on the field.PYMBLEPETE wrote:Just like in any video review of a try FT; if the replay clearly shows that the referee's decision was in error. In this case it was crystal clear on replay -doesnt matter how far it was from - that Woods was short of the line.
The Ref is a metre or 2 from where Woods planted that ball FFS .
I think all the Refs are to scared making there own decisions and send everything up stairs .
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
Offical member of the MCK fan club.
- foreveratiger
- Member
- Posts: 11615
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm
hobbo2803 wrote:Woods was short !foreveratiger wrote:I disagree , from that camera angle there is no clear evidence to suggest he was short , for that reason he has got to say TRY based on the original Ref's decision on the field.PYMBLEPETE wrote:Just like in any video review of a try FT; if the replay clearly shows that the referee's decision was in error. In this case it was crystal clear on replay -doesnt matter how far it was from - that Woods was short of the line.
The Ref is a metre or 2 from where Woods planted that ball FFS .
I think all the Refs are to scared making there own decisions and send everything up stairs .
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
So a Ref that's a metre or 2 from Woods has deemed it TRY , but you reckon his short

It's all opinions in the end , just like i thought Moses should of been Sent off.
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.
I just watched it then ... Woods was short !!!foreveratiger wrote:hobbo2803 wrote:Woods was short !foreveratiger wrote:I disagree , from that camera angle there is no clear evidence to suggest he was short , for that reason he has got to say TRY based on the original Ref's decision on the field."PYMBLEPETE" wrote:Just like in any video review of a try FT; if the replay clearly shows that the referee's decision was in error. In this case it was crystal clear on replay -doesnt matter how far it was from - that Woods was short of the line.
The Ref is a metre or 2 from where Woods planted that ball FFS .
I think all the Refs are to scared making there own decisions and send everything up stairs .
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
So a Ref that's a metre or 2 from Woods has deemed it TRY , but you reckon his short.
It's all opinions in the end , just like i thought Moses should of been Sent off.
The refs don't have the confidence or the balls these days to make a clear cut decision .
Watch it again , he was short !
I remember watching it live and was disappointed in woods that he couldn't reach out and find the line !!!
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
Offical member of the MCK fan club.
- AmericanHistoryX
- Member
- Posts: 7180
- Joined: Sat 11 Jul, 2009 11:15 am
- Location: Ho Chi Min City
disappointed? I think Woods wasnt keeping anything back
Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.2.3
Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.2.3
Clouds of Dust, Buckets of Blood

"They overcame the impossible by doing the unthinkable"
"They overcame the impossible by doing the unthinkable"
- foreveratiger
- Member
- Posts: 11615
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm
Well based on what you said ? he should of awarded a Try cause that is what he saw and originally deemed .hobbo2803 wrote:I just watched it then ... Woods was short !!!foreveratiger wrote:hobbo2803 wrote:Woods was short !foreveratiger wrote: I disagree , from that camera angle there is no clear evidence to suggest he was short , for that reason he has got to say TRY based on the original Ref's decision on the field.
The Ref is a metre or 2 from where Woods planted that ball FFS .
I think all the Refs are to scared making there own decisions and send everything up stairs .
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
So a Ref that's a metre or 2 from Woods has deemed it TRY , but you reckon his short.
It's all opinions in the end , just like i thought Moses should of been Sent off.
The refs don't have the confidence or the balls these days to make a clear cut decision .
Watch it again , he was short !
I remember watching it live and was disappointed in woods that he couldn't reach out and find the line !!!
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.
Once the refs decide to go up stairs it doesn't matter if he says I think it's a TRY or a NO TRY .foreveratiger wrote:Well based on what you said ? he should of awarded a Try cause that is what he saw and originally deemed .hobbo2803 wrote:I just watched it then ... Woods was short !!!foreveratiger wrote:"hobbo2803" wrote: Woods was short !
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
So a Ref that's a metre or 2 from Woods has deemed it TRY , but you reckon his short.
It's all opinions in the end , just like i thought Moses should of been Sent off.
The refs don't have the confidence or the balls these days to make a clear cut decision .
Watch it again , he was short !
I remember watching it live and was disappointed in woods that he couldn't reach out and find the line !!!
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
It's out of his hands then and the pressure is of him .
I believe they award a TRY after referring the division upstairs so they don't have players rush up and get in their faces ??
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
Offical member of the MCK fan club.
- foreveratiger
- Member
- Posts: 11615
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm
Your saying ref's don't have the balls to make a decision, well he should of with the Woods Try cause he believed it was a Try.
It's sad we have to rely on a video ref to make a call when the Ref is right there on this instance.
It's sad we have to rely on a video ref to make a call when the Ref is right there on this instance.
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.
I'm not a ref mate !!foreveratiger wrote:Your saying ref's don't have the balls to make a decision, well he should of with the Woods Try cause he believed itwas a Try.
It's sad we have to rely on a video ref to make a call when the Ref is right there on this instance.
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
Offical member of the MCK fan club.
- foreveratiger
- Member
- Posts: 11615
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm
But you claim he was shorthobbo2803 wrote:I'm not a ref mate !!foreveratiger wrote:Your saying ref's don't have the balls to make a decision, well he should of with the Woods Try cause he believed itwas a Try.
It's sad we have to rely on a video ref to make a call when the Ref is right there on this instance.
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0

It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.
He was short but I'm not a F.......... Ref !foreveratiger wrote:But you claim he was shorthobbo2803 wrote:I'm not a ref mate !!foreveratiger wrote:Your saying ref's don't have the balls to make a decision, well he should of with the Woods Try cause he believed itwas a Try.
It's sad we have to rely on a video ref to make a call when the Ref is right there on this instance.
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
God knows what goes through their heads ...
Aaaaaaaaaaahhh !!!!!
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
Offical member of the MCK fan club.
-
- Member
- Posts: 37767
- Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
My understanding would of been that if the ball finished on the line and Woods promoted the ball with his grounded arm /elbow it should of been a double movement
If the ref calls TRY the video ref must disprove it was a try , the ball must never have reached the line according to the video ref
If the ref calls TRY the video ref must disprove it was a try , the ball must never have reached the line according to the video ref
Thank you !!happy tiger wrote:My understanding would of been that if the ball finished on the line and Woods promoted the ball with his grounded arm /elbow it should of been a double movement
If the ref calls TRY the video ref must disprove it was a try , the ball must never have reached the line according to the video ref
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
Offical member of the MCK fan club.
- foreveratiger
- Member
- Posts: 11615
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm
It wasn't a double movement cause we had to play the ball and Titans didn't get a penalty.happy tiger wrote:My understanding would of been that if the ball finished on the line and Woods promoted the ball with his grounded arm /elbow it should of been a double movement
If the ref calls TRY the video ref must disprove it was a try , the ball must never have reached the line according to the video ref
In my opinion from that camera angle there is insufficient evidence to over rule the original ref's decision that it was a TRY . I mean the Ref is a couple metres away and his opinion is it's a Try.
What he should of said to the video Ref , I deemed it a Try please check for Double movement.
I was at the game so i have no idea what he was asking to check ? obviously it appears he wanted to check if he was short .
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.
-
- Forum Suppoter
- Posts: 3548
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun, 2013 7:33 pm
Blind Freddy could see he was short, ref, well, who knows :wtf he was thinking.hobbo2803 wrote:He was short but I'm not a F.......... Ref !
God knows what goes through their heads ...
Aaaaaaaaaaahhh !!!!!
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0
- foreveratiger
- Member
- Posts: 11615
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun, 2011 8:03 pm
But the Video Ref has made the field Ref look like a fool.
It depends who you talk to on this Forum, if you are Optimistic? it's because your delusional and need a reality check. If you are Pessimistic? Your accused of being a negative Nancy and to go and follow another Club.
-
- Member
- Posts: 37767
- Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
Just admit it , you were too busy taking happy honeymoon shots with UD to be watching the game or listening to the video ref live commentaryforeveratiger wrote:It wasn't a double movement cause we had to play the ball and Titans didn't get a penalty.happy tiger wrote:My understanding would of been that if the ball finished on the line and Woods promoted the ball with his grounded arm /elbow it should of been a double movement
If the ref calls TRY the video ref must disprove it was a try , the ball must never have reached the line according to the video ref
In my opinion from that camera angle there is insufficient evidence to over rule the original ref's decision that it was a TRY . I mean the Ref is a couple metres away and his opinion is it's a Try.
What he should of said to the video Ref , I deemed it a Try please check for Double movement.
I was at the game so i have no idea what he was asking to check ? obviously it appears he wanted to check if he was short .

-
- Member
- Posts: 37767
- Joined: Sun 27 Feb, 2011 4:49 pm
He was worried about his paycheck and doing his job I guessformerguest wrote:Blind Freddy could see he was short, ref, well, who knows :wtf he was thinking.hobbo2803 wrote:He was short but I'm not a F.......... Ref !
God knows what goes through their heads ...
Aaaaaaaaaaahhh !!!!!
Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0