Beau knows conning refs

Post Reply
User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29283
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Beau knows conning refs

Post by innsaneink » Fri 25 Jun, 2010 8:59 pm

Good work champ


User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29283
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Fri 25 Jun, 2010 9:29 pm

He also knows how to back la$t try $corer $$$$

king sirro
Member
Member
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 9:39 am

Post by king sirro » Fri 25 Jun, 2010 9:29 pm

U think? I thought it was clear Weyman grabbed him by the head which dragged his motion the opposite way to which he wanted to go to tackle Priddis. Very good decision.
LAUGH NOW CRY LATER--JS

User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29283
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Fri 25 Jun, 2010 9:34 pm

Beau took the opportunity, his arm was justr hanging there, there was no grip watsoever, he couldve got away if he wanted to, but I think he knew he was no chance anyway...imo

king sirro
Member
Member
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 9:39 am

Post by king sirro » Fri 25 Jun, 2010 9:36 pm

Split second stuff Innk, and that makes the difference that close to the line. Doesnt mater if he could have got away, the time it took to get away is what let Priddis score.
LAUGH NOW CRY LATER--JS


User avatar
innsaneink
Member
Member
Posts: 29283
Joined: Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:49 pm
Location: ...ahead of you....

Post by innsaneink » Fri 25 Jun, 2010 9:41 pm

It wouldnt have made any difference, he didnt know Priddis was gunna have a crack, I think he just had a punt seeing as weyman was cuddling him....backed a winner....I may well be totally wrong

User avatar
RatedRKO
Member
Member
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun 12 Jul, 2009 10:57 pm

Post by RatedRKO » Sat 26 Jun, 2010 12:05 am

Soward does it often, why can't Beau have a crack? :lol:

redemption
Member
Member
Posts: 1475
Joined: Wed 26 May, 2010 3:24 am

Post by redemption » Sat 26 Jun, 2010 12:21 am

it was a blatant penalty by a repeat offender....

enough said!

Post Reply