I couldn't stand Eisenhuth as a player.
Big but not imposing or threatening at all.
Seems like a politics player like connected to Gal and got the easy ride.
Hated seeing him line up for the Tigers.
One of the softest players we've ever had.
Totally disagree, I was a fan.
Eisenhuth was the ultimate anti-Taumololo - one of the few players who could stop Taumololo 1:1 at his own tryline. Also had good hands for a pass/offload, if he was instructed to do that. Pretty big motor for a big unit.
Yes he wasn't dynamic in hitups and his top speed was ordinary, but not everyone can or should be a barnstorming forward, and not all big blokes are automatically Hercules with the football. Forward packs are about balance and complimentary capabilities, like in the military. If you have too much of one type of player, you will be found out.
Huth is also a reliable, quiet, incident-free (suspension-free also?) club member, at low cost.
Definitely - Eisenhuth does far better in a better quality side. At Penrith he does exactly what is required, as a foil for JFH in the front row, and to supplement the other more attack-focused forwards like Kikau and Leniu.
Eisenhuth's major issue at Tigers was we lacked go-forward, so we could not best use Huth's strengths.
But like Bryce Gibbs before him, I was always at least confident that Huth would bolster the ruck defence if we were losing the forwards battle. Only the elite players can consistently be both a rock in defence and a dynamo in attack.
On the flipside, some of the best imposing and threatening players are high-risk or even detrimental players, who despite being a real handful with the footy or in defence, are also too unreliable for their own good, e.g. TPJ, Victor Radley, Dylan Napa etc.