Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[bptiger 0]

The sooner we ship Noffa off, the sooner we will have more coin left and a spot in top 30 to make a play for the next bloke.
I don’t care if will smith gets an upgrade so we can play Brooks in Reggie’s.
Right now our real issue is no controlling half and no back up to try.

What’s the point of getting more cap money we ain’t doing anything with the million we got already, the club is sitting on its hands

 

[Moh]

The more suggestions for Brooks' replacement I read, the more obvious it is that keeping Hastings may have been the play.

Seriously, none of the players mentioned are an improvement on Brooks. Want him gone, but don't want to move sideways.

Hastings is no doubt the much better half out of him and Brooks.

 

[earl]

I dont necessarily disagree that based purely on ability a Brooks on a cheap contract at 6 with a dominant 7 is a decent option but one of the main things holding us back is the stink and gossip surounding the club which unfortunately Brooks is a major contributing factor

so getting rid of Brooks might not help us on the field but it helps our recruitment alot more

Recruit who ?

I think the decision will be a public perception decision and they'll let him go. The issue to me is who are they going to get in.

 

[tiger_one]

Re Jack Wighton.

From Peter Badel, Courier Mail

EXCLUSIVE: Canberra have lodged a formal complaint to NRL to launch an investigation into Jack Wighton’s Souths deal. NRL boss Andrew Abdo says deal will be scrutinised.
https://twitter.com/badel_cmail

 

[finnzo]

If it’s tass we could get, I would suggest passing on him and saving our bucks for a good half. Tass ain’t gonna take the tigers to the promised land

Just remember the last left edge player we got from south’s Robert Jennings

 

[izotope]

Ricky salty

 

[Eternal Tiger]

Recruit who ?

I think the decision will be a public perception decision and they'll let him go. The issue to me is who are they going to get in.

You think the only reason to let him go is to appease public perception?

 

[tony soprano]

Are there any talents in the other clubs Reggie's squad?

Not much I think

 

[Stevec]

Are there any talents in the other clubs Reggie's squad?

Yes Ronald Volkman halfback is top point scorer in by far top point scoring team who is top of the table in KOE cup

 

[Dino]

Yes Ronald Volkman halfback is top point scorer in by far top point scoring team who is top of the table in KOE cup

Isn't he locked up for a couple years ?

 

[BirchgroveTigers]

If we think the halfback cupboard is bare - are there any ball playing, creative locks with a short kicking game about (Isiah Yeo types) that could guide us around the park? They may be easier to source.

I think this may have been Sheens’ plan if Hastings stayed?

Matamua - was a half up until recently. Hopefully he gets another 6 - 10 games off the bench this year and a good off season so he could be a regular player in 17 next year. Starting 13 playing every week might be a big ask for next year though…

 

[StarswithStripes]

I think players wanting to play for Benji is a myth.

Whereas Latrell has pulling power which is how they landed Wighton.

 

[stevied]

The more suggestions for Brooks' replacement I read, the more obvious it is that keeping Hastings may have been the play.

Seriously, none of the players mentioned are an improvement on Brooks. Want him gone, but don't want to move sideways.

Hastings is no doubt the much better half out of him and Brooks.

No point in crying over spilled milk. Any player is an improvement on Brooks because it's not Brooks! No, seriously, there must be someone we can sign who is, at least, serviceable and not an absolute liability like Brooks.

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

Tass is not a difference maker. Solid but not worth investing big money in. Prefer Graham but there's no way we get him. The priority must be a half decent, organising half.

try for Hawkins and Graham

 

[DGilly]

The more suggestions for Brooks' replacement I read, the more obvious it is that keeping Hastings may have been the play.

Seriously, none of the players mentioned are an improvement on Brooks. Want him gone, but don't want to move sideways.

Hastings is no doubt the much better half out of him and Brooks.

Keeping Hastings was always the play. Tigers looked 10x as good with him vs without. Absolutely mental that they let him go.

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

No point in crying over spilled milk. Any player is an improvement on Brooks because it's not Brooks! No, seriously, there must be someone we can sign who is, at least, serviceable and not an absolute liability like Brooks.

Kyle Flannagan is available

 

[Demps]

Whereas Latrell has pulling power which is how they landed Wighton.

South's is the premier indigenous club.

Wighton made the logical choice.
Playing with his best mates - Cody and Latrell.

Will be the team to watch next year.
Might even be able to beat Penrith during the regular season games.

 

[finnzo]

I feel sorry for our coaching staff yes they have made a few shocking decisions (hastings) but seriously look at the players they managed to bring in after getting our first wooden spoon. If a couple of things had just gone our way this year we would be 3 from 8 and we are fighting for the 8 but unfortunately things just haven’t worked out that way now we find our selfs in a huge mess I hope and pray we can attract a decent halfback to the club and move on from brooks

 

[earl]

Kyle Flannagan is available

We have two spots up for grabs. In all seriousness another option wouldn't hurt. We need a marquee signing but I don't think there are any on the market and we won't get them anyway. We have no idea who our halves are for the next however many seasons and we don't have any juniors that are realistically looking close to ready.

The management team of the footy side gave up last year and are making it clear the next 2 years are just about setting Benji up. Then I reckon it's 3 years for Benji to learn prior to getting punted.

 

[Moh]

No point in crying over spilled milk. Any player is an improvement on Brooks because it's not Brooks! No, seriously, there must be someone we can sign who is, at least, serviceable and not an absolute liability like Brooks.

This is the part I am strongly against.

We can't go into the market thinking like that, because we'll end up back in the market after failing with whoever we take a gamble on - JUST because it's not Brooks.

'Meh, whatever, as long as it's not Brooks' is not a recruitment decision.