OFFICIAL Taylan "Tiny" May

Which Johns? Because joey also said that the warriors are a bogey team of the storm when they haven't beaten them in around a decade
Matthew, but you are insinuating if Joey said it he's an idiot.

If Gould says it, it's an agenda.

If any other commentators say it, there is no agenda.

Almost every commentator has said he's going to hit a million. Do they all have agendas?

Not having a go, just saying the guy is stating facts.
 
Matthew, but you are insinuating if Joey said it he's an idiot.

If Gould says it, it's an agenda.

If any other commentators say it, there is no agenda.

Almost every commentator has said he's going to hit a million. Do they all have agendas?

Not having a go, just saying the guy is stating facts.
Mate Joey called says he wants to take you to dinner for your enthusiastic defence of his stupid incorrect comments that mean nothing.
 
Mate Joey called says he wants to take you to dinner for your enthusiastic defence of his stupid incorrect comments that mean nothing.
Taking it a bit far mate. See if you can engage with the point I was actually making.

Why does Gould have an agenda when he says Galvin is worth a million (but also says 19 year olds shouldn't be paid that much), but when other commentators say it they don't have an agenda?

Just seems silly to label everything Gould says with the agenda tag, that's all.
 
Taking it a bit far mate. See if you can engage with the point I was actually making.

Why does Gould have an agenda when he says Galvin is worth a million (but also says 19 year olds shouldn't be paid that much), but when other commentators say it they don't have an agenda?

Just seems silly to label everything Gould says with the agenda tag, that's all.
Mate you have mixed me up with someone else. My last mention on the forum about Gus was in February.
 
Taking it a bit far mate. See if you can engage with the point I was actually making.

Why does Gould have an agenda when he says Galvin is worth a million (but also says 19 year olds shouldn't be paid that much), but when other commentators say it they don't have an agenda?

Just seems silly to label everything Gould says with the agenda tag, that's all.
It seems silly to me that you don’t think Phil ‘Almighty’ Gould doesn’t have an agenda? Galvin leaving?
 
What motivation would some in the media have for pushing a narrative that someone is worth x number of dollars? Surely, we're not that naive not to think there is a puppet master pulling strings in the background.
 
Taking it a bit far mate. See if you can engage with the point I was actually making.

Why does Gould have an agenda when he says Galvin is worth a million (but also says 19 year olds shouldn't be paid that much), but when other commentators say it they don't have an agenda?

Just seems silly to label everything Gould says with the agenda tag, that's all.
Galvin was just an example, he has done it numerous times. If you think a general manager or whatever he is for Dogs that’s on tv every week isn’t trying to manipulate things then get your head out the sand honestly.
 
Taking it a bit far mate. See if you can engage with the point I was actually making.

Why does Gould have an agenda when he says Galvin is worth a million (but also says 19 year olds shouldn't be paid that much), but when other commentators say it they don't have an agenda?

Just seems silly to label everything Gould says with the agenda tag, that's all.
Possibly because other commentators aren't GM of a football club.
 
Possibly because other commentators aren't GM of a football club.
So because Gould is the GM of a football club, he can't say things that are true or anything for that matter, or else he has an agenda. This is regardless of who else has said exactly the same thing AND, supporters of this club are also saying the same thing.

In summary

Galvin will get offered a million

Gould says it. Agenda
Commentator says it. No agenda
Fans say it. No agenda

Got it. Good logic.
 
So because Gould is the GM of a football club, he can't say things that are true or anything for that matter, or else he has an agenda. This is regardless of who else has said exactly the same thing AND, supporters of this club are also saying the same thing.

In summary

Galvin will get offered a million

Gould says it. Agenda
Commentator says it. No agenda
Fans say it. No agenda

Got it. Good logic.
My point is as a GM of a football club he shouldn't even be allowed to put forward his opinions as a commentator on national tv. It is a classic example of a conflict of interest and fuels the fire of people saying he has an agenda. The NRL are as weak as piss in allowing him the latitude he has.
 
My point is as a GM of a football club he shouldn't even be allowed to put forward his opinions as a commentator on national tv. It is a classic example of a conflict of interest and fuels the fire of people saying he has an agenda. The NRL are as weak as piss in allowing him the latitude he has.
I understand where you're coming from. I just don't agree.
 
My point is as a GM of a football club he shouldn't even be allowed to put forward his opinions as a commentator on national tv. It is a classic example of a conflict of interest and fuels the fire of people saying he has an agenda. The NRL are as weak as piss in allowing him the latitude he has.
Plus he's ugly
 
Plus he's ugly
meow ,lol ,he has his health back ,makes a lot of sense. Caveat on the Galvin speak ,is Gus say's at ,sometime during Galvins lotto contract he maybe worth it most likely at that price as a franchise player 4 Wests,or somewhere else but hopes we dont over pay n Galvin stays at WT
 
Back
Top