Tim Sheens
Well-known member
As I wrote in the jersey thread regarding the new predominantly orange version, we are Wests Tigers, not the Balmain Magpies. Yet here we are in just weeks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. You can’t rank it until you see the fallout. If it’s something that’s blown over by Xmas, then it’s just something that’s given us something to get fired up about in the boring monotony of the off season.Because up to this point it’s been such smooooooooth sailing!
Pearl clutchers and certain shade of orange fans are getting upset at this? lol. The club has been a lost cause for decades. This is far from even top 5 off season shenanigans.
LOL....you think I cant cop that juvenile username dig?You have been having a crack at me for no good reason.
Don’t have a crack at people if you can’t cop a return serve.
You should know that by now.
Fair enough and we should hopefully get the full truth behind it all very soon.The board minutes will make it easy if Richo was correct on establishing good corporate governance.
As a director myself (not with Wests Tigers of course) The decision to remove all independents and not Richo if decisions were being made without board engagement doesn’t make sense.
Some of the agreements made are significant and been months in the making these would’ve been at the board in some fashion especially in a small organization that is top heavy as the Wests Tigers are.
Richo has mentioned numerous times corporate governance and if this was bypassed he shouldn’t have been supported in the statement.
That is the challenge I have currently which is why I’m not in the HBG camp. Things don’t align with the statement made by HBG or the actions during the year.
Having an each way bet now to cover your arse....smart moveVery interesting.
Nobody will support HBG involvement with Wests Tigers if this statement is found to be true.
You don’t like liars but you are happy to run with the heard without knowing any factual evidence.LOL....you think I cant cop that juvenile username dig?
It gave me a laugh and makes you look like the child you are.
I dont like trolls and liars....good enough reason for me to have a crack at you
Here is an excerpt from the joint statement of all 4 independent directors.
“We reject any suggestion of a lack of communication with Holman Barnes Group. Holman Barnes Group is represented on the board of the Wests Tigers and its representative has been present at all Wests Tigers board meetings and provided with all board information. No concerns have been raised by the representative of Holman Barnes Group at any Wests Tigers board.”
Putting the club and and the nrl into disrepute, memberships being cancelled, bad press, upset fans, possible issues with player re-signings.....There is absolutely a chance they have bungled this up.
There is also a chance they had a genuine reason for dismissing the independent board members and if that is the case everyone glass been jumping to conclusions for no good reason.
Chairman and three independants dismissed isnt enough fallout?I agree. You can’t rank it until you see the fallout. If it’s something that’s blown over by Xmas, then it’s just something that’s given us something to get fired up about in the boring monotony of the off season.
Really? Stupid…. or totally accurate?What a stupid comment. Grow up stupid.
It’s now gone too far without the truth being exposed.Interesting that all 4 have come forward together, with I think 2 now having open comments and PVL statement intentionally mentioning politics.
Just hope the minutes were captured.
And back to the same board set up with an 0-14 finals record dating back to 2011. Fantastic.Chairman and three independants dismissed isnt enough fallout?
I know there may be more to come....or we may not find out much at all, everyone seems to be sure any NRL investigation will eventually be public knowledge, not if they can help it imo...the four steps back this has caused after our 3 forward this season is just another own goal and something we dont need
Not in that sense, but if it’s proven that important decisions were being made without them making it to board level, I would then think they have the right to do what they have done.Putting the club and and the nrl into disrepute, memberships being cancelled, bad press, upset fans, possible issues with player re-signings.....
Do you personally believe they have a good enough reason for all the chaos?
Wouldn't that be grounds for removal of the CEO?Not in that sense, but if it’s proven that important decisions were being made without them making it to board level, I would then think they have the right to do what they have done.
They will be.Interesting that all 4 have come forward together, with I think 2 now having open comments and PVL statement intentionally mentioning politics.
Just hope the minutes were captured.
Let’s say for sh*ts’n giggles, this all comes back to Burgess as the HBG rep having, as the independent directors have outlined, been privy to & involved in all key decisions. And he has misled his own HBG board members & CEO to achieve a desired outcome. I wonder if it can be as simple as him being ousted from WT & HBG, the independent directors reinstated to the WT board & a new HBG rep installed.Interesting that all 4 have come forward together, with I think 2 now having open comments and PVL statement intentionally mentioning politics.
Just hope the minutes were captured.
Let's say decision were made without consultation, do you think sackingNot in that sense, but if it’s proven that important decisions were being made without them making it to board level, I would then think they have the right to do what they have done.
Ive told you I dont believe PatonYou don’t like liars but you are happy to run with the heard without knowing any factual evidence.
That’s not contradictory at all.
Posters such as BWG, Mighty Tiger and BAGNF05 just to name a few back up their statements with evidence which makes sense.
That is called discussion which is what this forum in meant for.
I think the forum might wig out if that happened.Let’s say for sh*ts’n giggles, this all comes back to Burgess as the HBG rep having, as the independent directors have outlined, been privy to & involved in all key decisions. And he has misled his own HBG board members & CEO to achieve a desired outcome. I wonder if it can be as simple as him being ousted from WT & HBG, the independent directors reinstated to the WT board & a new HBG rep installed.
Logically yes.Wouldn't that be grounds for removal of the CEO?