Do any of you know if cup or flegg are typically considered a better development ground?
Ie if the player had the choice of both, all things being equally what is better? Is it more about the strength of a team, eg crap cup team then leave the young player in Flegg? How about combo’s, does that...
3 - Skelton (so many tough and important carries)
2 - Twal (immense)
1 - Bula (changes out attack)
Hard not to give Luai points for those 1 on 1 tackles.
Sorry Crazy, I was honestly smiling and shaking my head as I wrote it. I was trying to poke fun based on you self naming as crazycat. You were clearly just messing around.
This place is better because of the sheer variety of people on here. Keep it real with some crazy mind bends!!
Mason has improved out of site under the high ball. He definitely puts in giving hope that he will continue to grow as a long term versatile utility player. Three or four years in cup and he will be a different proposition.
Yeah, he may be still injured. Maybe Dogs not perfect example. Point is Latu debut was 18 then a big pile of disruption with the plan to rebuild him very hard to see right now.
I worry because his development has been disrupted with injury and now we disrupt his game time.
Compare it to how Manly and Bulldogs (Woods) are bringing on their halves. Lots of game time in Reserve grade, or how Storm brought on Grant etc.
This is a great case of why a lot of peptides should be legal. On the plus side sounds like it’s not to far off in the US space we won’t be far behind them.
From 12 weeks to 6