Why follow the recommendations? To avoid a backlash from fans
Why blow it up later? To gain back control. Maybe if we do it before Christmas no one will notice.
He had been skimping on the football department until an independent review came along, Richo was appointed and then $ went into the football team, including Richo’s salary. Its because of this investment that we managed a profit for the first time in years!
This is the crux of the issue. I remember when the podcasters interviewed one of the ousted HBG directors he mentioned this.
Essentially HBG are simply doing their job and living their company values so long as they have control of wests tigers. Without this control I suspect they believe that...
From a financial and legal perspective is this actually correct?
It would be the same for other NRL teams that are owned by leagues clubs though right?
Also by saying “I wasn’t up to the job” and “I did my best” is hinting to PVL that there are issues beyond what one of the greatest club administrators in himself can even control.