Recent content by rihannafan1

I'd put Murray in over Seyfarth. Alex has had a lot of time in firsts to show us what he can do, and that is: lose the tackle, lose the ruck, ptb slow, stifle attack in the red zone, average 1 penalty a game. The Storm might be able to turn him around and he might have a great second career as a...

He and AD were clunky.

Bula injured? Or bulked up? Bc he looked slow and immobile compared to past seasons. His athleticism is his x-factor so he needs that.

Brookes came on at a very different stage of the game too, much more favourable.

Casey Badger in midseason form!

I think Attard is older and will get first shot. Maybe better to ask what other clubs are interested in them and when those team put a contract in front of them, would they give their right nut to still try to sign with us?

Deep cut but I thought Josese Lanyon #25 was better than Mason and could do a decent cameo job in the NRL if needed. I just don't see where Mason is needed in our team.

Which backside, Darcy or Tucker?

What???

You are the one defining an agenda as anyone with an alternate opinion. I am not. Tucker has plenty of opinions different to other posters but they are fluid, depending on the discussion. He doesn't have an agenda. He isn't highlighting every mistake certain people make and isn't trying to...

Come on mate. When things improve on field let's not pretend that people on the board won't make sure to give themselves credit.

Unhealthy are the sycophants from Wests/HBG coming on here pushing their agenda. Not only do they believe they 'own' the club, they seek to counter anything that discredits them. Apparently they do no wrong.

Ironic that you are upset about being excluded from a group and would like some transperancy. Sounds like WT fans asking for an explanation about the HBG board.

Like I said, like clockwork. Whether it is here or in a public or private group, the HBG supporters turn up when the established order is threatened. When I say 'threatened' I don't necessarily mean you personally.

A difference of opinion is definitively different from not being 'fully supportive', which is what you asserted. That's what I would call it.