Recent content by The Chad

You named 3 "Magpies aligned" posters. This one-upmanship & attempts to belittle others is not unique to that side of the argument. In fact, I think the numbers weigh heavier the other side.

Zeus & Minotaurs? Wimbledon & MK Dons. You sir, have upped your game of late.

What do the clubs get, revenue-wise, for playing in Vegas?

"This year" as in last season? Or the upcoming season?

Same. I like everything he's done so far, and his track record is very promising.

Apparently the CEO & a board member are on their way over to check it out for their own interests in 2027. So it seems that the club did in fact have interest in the venture. I'm sure there are financial benefits to that exposure over there, plus- don't miss Round 1...

My enthusiasm for what Shaun can bring doesn't diminish what Richo has proven in the past. I will say, from an outside opinion, Shaun appears to be more fan-friendly in his actions- not just in his short time at the Tigers, but certainly through his time at the Mariners. My concern at the time...

Interesting that the new CEO is supposed to be keen on the potential of going to Las Vegas. I imagine this is a financial decision. And the former CEO was openly critical in the media about this venture. Could that have been seen as taking away consultation with the financiers of the club...

Not sure if you follow the A-League, but the way he turned the Mariners around & the respect he earned from their fans certainly makes me feel confident he can turn the fortunes of other, lower performing clubs in his future.

That approach can work, certainly.

I'd like to keep Skelton as a valuable depth/starter option. But money will likely play it's part & Tavana looks a decent option coming though as well.

I think Richo was good for the club. I'm excited for Mielekamp's impact though as I have a lot of time for what he's achieved.

So absolutely no bias in his reports then..

Not entirely true that their hand was forced- they acted on a recommendation, but I think your point is fair. I don't know that PVL wasn't responsible. But, that would be the first I've heard that from anywhere. Maybe we just uncovered a new message board truth to be run out? :p That said-...

I mean, at what point did Chammas & Read's reports go from inflammatory to home truths? Was it when it suits the argument?