There was a protest demanding a review of governance and under pressure, they reluctantly implemented the findings. It's well documented.
Mate...people aren't missing anything. We've been living this drama for years. Some worked it out sooner than others, but after a while, you can't ignorebthe...
Balmain is irrelevant to this discussion. They have a minority share and they have always had a minority share. That is not the point.
Wests Ashfield are not “owed” anything by Wests Tigers. They owe the community. They operate under a governance structure that does not mirror any other NRL...
Yes thats True, but at any moment the board of Wests Ashfield can dismiss the board of Wests Tigers as they just did. So regardless of what it's 27000 members think, only 5 debenture holders that sit on the Wests Ashfield board get a say in how Wests Tigers is run even if it is against the...
Nope...I think this is where a lot of the confusion and arguments start.
The board of the wests tigers is not what people are talking about fundamentally, although it is ultimately affected.
It is 20 unelected debenture holders at HBG.
it's not more complicated than that.
If people could...
It has to do with concentration of power to unelected individuals.
It's why all these dramas keep happening.
HBG as an entity isn't really the issue, it's the governance structure that is the issue. If that goes, HBG begins to operate like a normal club with member voting and things change...
Perhaps I could put it into perspective?
You're trying to offer an obscure viewpoint to people that have had their club systematically destroyed over a 10 year period. Maybe you're super chilled about everything, but I know you're smart enough to realise that you'd be in the minority.
All this...
You and I are friends. I agree with everything you say. At least publicly. I simply facilitate discussion between you and the wider group. I'm trying to help you!