HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Richo supported an Independent Board well documented and so did the above mentioned. Those remaining doesn't appear so - would you agree?
Absolutely. I'm not trying to dispute that- just curious if Richo supported the removal of those three previous board members. Because that would have put him in allegiance with the remaining board members.
 
If they had valid reasoning, why would they go ahead and reinstate them? That just doesn't make any sense to me.. sacking 4 directors isn't a small decision made lightly.
It's weird.

But so is O'Farrell even agreeing to come back.

Which could suggest fault on both sides?

And if that is the case- validates some of the HBG reasoning?
 
It is possible.

But, he is the head of the organisation as it stands. If he's satisfied with the outcome, there is a chance that the full story has been heard & that HBG might have had some valid reasoning.

Unfortunately- unless we hear a complete version of events from someone involved, every argument is based on belief.

Have the allegations against Richo been dismissed?
No they haven't, have they been upheld though?
 
No they haven't, have they been upheld though?
I honestly don't know. This is me, just asking.

It feels like the whole thing has been forgotten about by the message board, so I was wondering if I'd missed something in the Christmas rush.
 
Sorry @krissy, but this jerk's personal comments referring to me in his post can't go unanswered, particularly when it's liked by "Moderator." @Suzie-Q.

@weststigers
I have never had any involvement with HBG or Western Suburbs Magpies or Balmain Tigers.

As for my credentials for being on a Board, such as HBG or Wests Tigers no, I certainly wouldn't have. However, in life experiences and success, I would back mine against a narcissist such as you.

I served my country as an infantry soldier in the Vietnam War. I have received an OAM for over 20 years of service as an advocate representing veterans in appeals to Veterans' Review Boards and Administrative Review Boards. I also have also worked as a volunteer for people with disabilities for over 30 years. I have worked as a garbo, licenced realestate agent and in management roles. I have also owned my own businesses.

Can I ask what you have done, except promote yourself as an expert on football and licensed clubs administration?
 
Sorry @krissy, but this jerk's personal comments referring to me in his post can't go unanswered, particularly when it's liked by "Moderator." @Suzie-Q.

@weststigers
I have never had any involvement with HBG or Western Suburbs Magpies or Balmain Tigers.

As for my credentials for being on a Board, such as HBG or Wests Tigers no, I certainly wouldn't have. However, in life experiences and success, I would back mine against a narcissist such as you.

I served my country as an infantry soldier in the Vietnam War. I have received an OAM for over 20 years of service as an advocate representing veterans in appeals to Veterans' Review Boards and Administrative Review Boards. I also have also worked as a volunteer for people with disabilities for over 30 years. I have worked as a garbo, licenced realestate agent and in management roles. I have also owned my own businesses.

Can I ask what you have done, except promote yourself as an expert on football and licensed clubs administration?
Bro its a footy club internet forum
 
Absolutely. I'm not trying to dispute that- just curious if Richo supported the removal of those three previous board members. Because that would have put him in allegiance with the remaining board members.
I think it's fair to say that Richardson had no influence or control over who HBG appointed to represent them. The three that were originally ousted following the review - which recommended an independent board that they supported didn't last - and whatever Romero did wrong, it certainly resulted in her no longer holding her position - and I believe she is also banned.
Given Richardson's endorsement of her one can only wonder if that was enough to spell the writing on the wall. "A serious breach of confidentiality" - It seems it doesn't take much to get a 7 year ban if the numbers are against you. Some one out there knows.
 
Guys can we please rein in the snarky attitudes?
There is nothing gained by it and if anything it just adds to hostility. If you feel the need to post negativity maybe just log out & walk away until it passes. Christmas is a tough time for a lot of folks & some people are dealing with some very heavy stuff at the moment. By all means talk about football but please lose the us vs them mentality & the name calling & mocking tones. Time to stop focusing on the past & talking in circles. Please be respectful as we move forward to a new year.
💯 as soon as someone takes a defensive mindset they turn off rational discussion and evaluation of views put forward
 
How does having an opinion on HBG make it an agenda? Why does it matter if she's admin? Can admins not have an opinion?

Do you hold the Wests Magpie forum leaders to the same account? Paul Stamo is one of the most toxic voices within the Wests tigers fan group and is consistently driving division amongst Wests tigers fans.


I'm very open to alternative views, I have been trying to get into a discussion with peoplle like yourself since this kicked off..

The thing is, it isn't a discussion when one side refuses to answer completely reasonable questions..

So why won't you lot engage in an open and fair discussion if it's so good for the souL? You just prefer to point fingers and argue than to address the serious questions.





Theres a few seperate issues to this whole saga over the last 3 weeks where online fake news has just exploded....say it often enough...over and over and over.... it gets enough exposure, the masses online do not research they just pass it on as fact or "I heard blah blah. Propaganda.
 
Theres a few seperate issues to this whole saga over the last 3 weeks where online fake news has just exploded....say it often enough...over and over and over.... it gets enough exposure, the masses online do not research they just pass it on as fact or "I heard blah blah. Propaganda.
So, how does what you are saying compare to what's been on display here recently.
 
On this one V'landys appears to have completely stuffed up and looks to have completely misunderstood what the issue actually is.

Maybe I am the one that has misunderstood what he has done here, because as others have said, it looks as though he has made things worse or has he just given HBG enough rope to hang themselves.
When was the last time PVL stuffed up something?
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top