Search results

Who now appoints the new board. If it's the same board ie. (HBG) that appointed the last one, do we expect any better or are they the problem. Let's hope it's not the old 'better the devil you know'.

To the four board members that have essentially sacked themselves today, hats off to you. You can have as many reviews as you want but without their actions nothing would have changed.

Nofa has form being dropped. Both Cleary and Madge dropped him for poor training. If he has come back to pre season under done , own it and train your arse off. If he has complained to Rlpa because of the training he needs to go.

Have we met. You know me well.

He needs to put on a few kilos Demps. I can show him the ropes if he needs. I'm a pro at it.

Shuster = overpaid Turbo = overpaid Brooks = overpaid Jake = overpaid Peter peters = overweight

Great experience for the kid. Let’s hope he plays well.

I don't claim to know the facts mate. I'm just a dumb supporter waving his flag hoping for the best outcome for our club. I just find the process a bit on the nose and can't really trust the process. Hope I am wrong.

I am all for a review and more importantly, change at the Tigers. The only question I ask is that if there are issues with the board structure or members of that board, they are the only ones that can initiate the changes. It might mean they are sacking or removing themselves from their...

I doesn't matter if he is paid or not. I feel there is a conflict of interest there. Not doubting his skills and ability to do the job just that he more than likely spends time with and has some sort of relationship with the same people he is auditing. It just doesn't look right.

So if the review concludes that the board are crap what happens. Sorry for asking another unanswerable question.

I would suggest that only the board can ok these changes. The same board that are potentially the ones found to be incompetent from this review. I very much doubt that they will get a negative response as they have employed this bloke and I dare say sit in the same box on game day with him...

Do they still fund our Campbelltown juniors?

Who owns Wests leagues club and do they have anything to do with our junior leagues anymore.

Just seems like one big mess to me mate. I can't see the point of putting two more independents on the board if they really have no voting power. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed though.

Does that mean there will be more independents on the board than not. If the answer is no, what's the point.

Being the owners, do they have the power to get rid of the WT board?

Your right. But who's to say they are not part of the problem. Are they part of the review.

I just find it ludicrous to think the people that initiated the review ie. the board could be the ones that are found to be incompetent. What will change - nothing.

If the 'review' finds the board members are crap, are they going to stand down.