Search results

Who says we are only offering him 350?

People are delusional if they think he’ll only be on 350-400.

This is the discourse we’ve been reduced to. My God.

For what?

Seems like he and his management (crazy he has one) are looking to ride the nepo train.

Someone mentioned in the Signings thread.

As good as he’s been, I think it’s getting a bit carried away to suggest he’s our long term 7.

I’m really lost on this. How do the Bulldogs threaten legal action over something directed at members of the public?

It’s said Flanagan wants to play him at 13. Seems as though we aren’t the only club who sees his future in the forwards.

The woah is us thread is over on the Kennel.

Latu is just inconsistent. Comes with being a 20 year old half. Actually, I wouldn’t even call him inconsistent, cos that implies he’s had bad games and he hasn’t. Just had games where he hasn’t had much impact. But that’s only because he’s 20.

First I’ve ever heard that a coach is only performing cos it’s a contract year. Did not know that was even a thing.

Being abused by supporters comes with the territory being a player. Retaliation is no excuse.

It seems like he wants to stay. Looks like the ball is in the club’s court.

Which is a bit of a concern. You can’t rely on emotion every week.

I remember being at the Dogs/Parra prelim in 09. At one point in the game, Hayne made a try saving cover tackle, but it went to the video ref because there may have been foul play. I remember during the replays when it become evident that Hayne hit the Dogs player high, one lunatic Dogs fan...

Not with today’s bro culture.

Oh man, he’ll be hurting from that.

I’d rather him be honest than delusional. Like Cleary claiming he didn’t see the trainer run in front of Campbell. As if.

Who’s taking them?