Search results

  1. A

    Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

    Canberra can have Liddle provided they promise not to give him back.
  2. A

    Luke Brooks

    He would have been better off taking the tackle. It was ruled no try on field, was only called back for review because he scored.
  3. A

    Luke Brooks

    I just look at it by the numbers. He is (reportedly) on $850k but delivering output of a $250k-$300k player. If another team is willing to take him at near full freight, it makes sense to let him go imo.
  4. A

    Luke Brooks

    It would provide some vigorous discussion though.
  5. A

    Luke Brooks

    No him going would make minimal difference to our performance, it would just save money. Our squad sucks, our coach sucks and our administrators are hopeless.
  6. A

    Luke Brooks

    No definitely not alone, but you can’t pay $850k for a halfback who never steps up. Granted he’s never been strong stepping up but at least in the past he was a decent attacking player on $550k. Under Madge he’s regressed badly and is getting paid more. He doesn’t work in our system and he...
  7. A

    Luke Brooks

    Brooks problem isn’t skill, he just has no killer instinct, and thats got nothing to do with his teammates. Do you think Brooks makes that 2 point field goal Reynolds kicked against us? Not in a million years. All good halfbacks can step up when it’s needed. Brooks doesn’t have that attribute.
  8. A

    Luke Brooks

    I can't believe we're comparing Adam Reynolds to Brooks. Adam Reynolds is a billion times better in every way
  9. A

    Luke Brooks

    I'm tired of reading about Brooks altogether.
  10. A

    Luke Brooks

    It’s comforting to know that 20% of the cap is allocated to Brooksy, Nofo and Luc on long term contracts. The future is as bright as a black hole.
  11. A

    Luke Brooks

    Crazy stuff.
  12. A

    Luke Brooks

    My view is that he’s on a big contract for the next two years and it’s a bad contract for the club. If there’s a way out of it, we should jump at the opportunity. It will make us marginally weaker for ‘22 but we’ll be bottom 4 regardless.
  13. A

    Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

    Keeping Brooks on $850k, re-signing Luciano on $575k. Surprising we’re not a powerhouse with such intelligent decisions being made.
  14. A

    Luke Brooks

    Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
  15. A

    Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

    Let’s face it, 2022 is going to be a bad year. If we have the opportunity to get rid of Brooks contract and recruit a good halfback for 2023, we should take it. It’s good business to get rid of him now when there is some interest. He’s a bog average halfback on very good money. We should be...
  16. A

    Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

    I view it more as an opportunity to get rid of a bad contract. If he’s agitating for a release, let him go. Best for all parties.
  17. A

    Luke Brooks

    I can’t see them taking him without us chipping in
  18. A

    Luke Brooks

    Sheensy will probably try and get Benji back for one last hurrah.
  19. A

    Luke Brooks

    Nice try Knights, we’re not losing our 2021 player of the year without a fight (the fight being how much we have to chip in lol)
  20. A

    Luciano Leilua 700k

    He was lucky to stay in first grade. He’s not an 80 minute player, he’s much better coming off the bench. He’s a $350k player, would be happy for him to go elsewhere
Back
Top