Search results

He'll either be great or considered a plodder and the club lauded or castigated. There'll be no middle ground.

Or provides easily refuted testimony and then gets reminded about the perjury provisions. We only ever know what the media tells us and these cases have many factors and not every report is entirely unbiased about the people involved. We all move on.

That may well be true for both parties......

EGO

Aren't all posts on the forum subjective from our own viewpoints.

That is correct- although it get exhibited in many forms.

Does wonders for your psychology studies though!

We'd never know though

Why - there'll be arguments over the merits of anyone who is signed and for how much/how long compared to another player who could have been signed for less etc etc. We'll all give our learned opinion and believe we are right in our views. It'll never stop it's just what social media was...

I don't know how long it has been since you've visited one but they are very hygienic these days. Not good for business if the word gets out that customers have been infected and very damaging to the worker's reputation and future income.

"The DV charge was only withdrawn because the prosecution witnesses didn’t come to court. It wasn’t withdrawn because the Police thought they didn’t have a case. They just couldn’t prove it." It wouldn't be the first time that either party had to face the fact of providing the evidence under...

He isn't leaving Qld https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/rugby_league/broncos-in-his-blood-haas-manager-predicts-next-step/ar-AA1FUhcG

That's what he's doing at the Titans so why would he do it for less money here ?? They are not going to kick in $200-$300k each year for the next 2 years.

Could you like Naden and Staines ??

You can't force someone to break a contract with someone else - that other person has legal remedies in their favour against both parties. If we did that do you think "Satan" wouldn't exercise those rights against the Tigers ??

Maybe he'll make it up in winning bonuses.

One person's value isn't another's. There would have been a lot of factors taken into account in the offer he didn't see - potential, keeping a player in a position we lack, making it high enough to ward off other clubs etc. Those factors don't come into it when he's released from his contract...

Can we move on ?

They can't give a player who doesn't want to come over and why would he ?