Search results

Most players can make excuses for why most high tackles occurred, but it means nothing. Don’t ask me what he should do, because it means nothing, I don’t make the rules. He is not the first to be suspended for a high tackle on someone that lowers their height. He can always challenge the...

His meant to not hit someone in the head (and late) Most high tackles are unintentional, but under the rules all tacklers hold the responsibility. Unfortunately latrell has proven a number of times to have trouble tackling below the shoulders irrespective. of circumstance. So it is reasonable...

The tackle was late and high The rules don’t allow for ‘situations’ as the tackler holds all responsibility At least that’s how it’s explained unless a different outcome is preferred by the powers in charge

RE Matamua and Tumeth A Chammas statement on 100% footy “"I think (their issue is) with the club in general, the football department, and whether they should be in the mix (for first grade) and not sent down to Sydney Shield." It has been stated by the club that neither player or their...

Fox Sports has removed the page permanently regarding the two bullying claims by tumeth etc Andrew prentice Daily mail story is still on line Danny Weidler and Michael Chammas story is still on line At what point can they be pursued legally either by the club or affected players given the...

Or maybe the players around them

Leichhardt crowd should welcome him back 😵‍💫

The Moses minnions say tigers released the info - all their fault So tigers should have stayed quiet while Moses controls the story thru his minnions Not on richo’s watch

I think it was a very poor game by the officials But the tigers virtually played with 2 off their bench Minimum time for TDS Sukkar nil time ??

Isn’t matamua in our top 30 and been sent to below reserve grade ?? Same with tumeth ??

They might be, but what are the ‘interested’ teams thinking about what they may be getting into with Moses management ‘style’

Still provides a cloud over team Galvin to maybe step back from pursuing legal battles

Surely a response will be a defamation claim against Galvin camp re development claims by Moses/galvin against club/benji

Sorry in advance about the Long comment, but here goes I’m a 70 year old tigers supporter who has seen most things rugby league, but the dark side of the Galvin issue is concerning as there are ‘some’ commentators ignoring facts to support team Galvin (Moses) wests tigers arranged a meeting...

No Don’t change to what’s being suggested if it doesn’t achieve the intended ‘real’ outcome They need to ensure there is no collusion by any parties and that would be difficult given they can’t even enforce a ‘real’ November 1 exclusion period

O it will make no difference they will just create seperate businesses to keep the control ‘in house’

Pretty sure this is verbatim of the uncle Gus conversation with Galvin as outlined on 100 % footy Just coincidence of course ““I just feel that as I move into an important period of my development as a half, that I continue to build my game at a different club…,”

I think has slimed down this year and is much more effective across the park

I think he would have been out injured anyway, so good timing with injury

I think I heard somewhere there is a Canberra club option they can take up by round 10 ? In their court