Search results

Not smart having it as tigers v Magpies. It's not.

So if they weren't taken to board level, why fire the board?

Let's expand that out... Does any club run a $100, transferable debenture with no accountability, that gives a select unqualified group ultimate power over a non profit.

They might need to add the luai clauses now. Friggin HBG

That could be read as #Holman Barnes Gout .... probably also relevant

I posted something a while back in what Google Gemini thought potential breaches might be. Here is what it thinks NSW L&G could do based on current public information. This has not been edited Based on the Registered Clubs Act 1976 and current events, here are the three main powers Liquor &...

Yeah, but one of the things he always mentioned that was key to success was a functioning board and a chairman he can work with, and that if that wasn't in place, he wouldn't have agreed to sign.

That explanation would make more sense, not the one that their CEO trotted out. But why wouldn't HBG put that kind of stuff in the agreement?? Like no-go areas, unless it had a vote at HBG level. Richo would purely be looking at it from a cost and synergy perspective. If he's been given a remit...

Do we think that Dennis put his CEO out there as a sacrificial lamb because this communication issue was on him? Why didn't Dennis get on video and explain? Because there was no backing track?

Can buy them in bulk

Not really - try adding logic. Brett Read did it well.

They just removed the ONLY TWO people who were voted in by the members because they had a different view. So no, they are not operating with that modus operandi. There is enough evidence now that this debenture group are acting out of self-interest, not those of the club or members. .... and if...

I got the same

Here's what google gemini managed to summarise for us for potential breaches. Keep in mind, this is just from publicly available information so will be limited. Based on recent events involving the Holman Barnes Group (HBG)—including the mass sacking of the Wests Tigers board, the suspension...

You said it. Do you think this is the best interests of the club or self-interest? There is no mechanism for them to find out, via member's vote, given that they have squatter's rights. As I said in an earlier post, if these guys were democratically elected by the owners (i.e. members) and...

The main question for me was why this was not solved with a discussion? Why was there a need to dissolve the board?

100%. Anyone using Balmain is being misleading - they're defunct and have no power. Remove their seat for all I care, I don't think they deserve it.

Take it up with Joel Caine. He made the comment on national radio.

It's 4 people they had to contact. They even had their CEO make the announcement, with the board hiding in the shadows again. Weak-ass human beings, acting like weak, amateurish leaders.

I think he is gathering facts. The board members even had to find out from Carayannis - how piss poor is that. So I'm guessing Richo was in the dark on this one too. Plus, he has an employment contract, unlike the board.