Search results

It would appear the majority who want HBG to act for the benefit of Wests Tigers are Wests Tigers fans. They don’t want Balmain Tigers back, they don’t want Wests Magpies back. HBG doesn’t seem to align with this thinking.

Having Elias as the chairman would make following wests tigers difficult. Plus HBG would still be in control of both boards

Absolutely Players and managers have seen a dysfunctional administration over a number of years. Players can have no confidence that what they sign up for can be guaranteed to be in place by the time they turn up for training The joint has proven that with how many coaches in the last 10 years...

Yes I noted that as well All grounds should be fully available but may not be ‘preferred’ by HBG going forward. Nothing will likely change re the availability of Campbelltown and Leichhardt. Should be evenly split + magic round. But then again maybe not 🤔

I think that’s what most want, for “HBG to get their shit together” and Wests Tigers to be the primary consideration in all decisions moving forward. Unfortunately there appear some that just want to keep defending HBG even when they obviously haven’t “got their shit together”

Wests and Balmain are gone This is a wests tigers supporters disillusionment with HBG

From memory (which isn’t great) I think he agreed to terms with the bulldogs, but said when questioned that there was a misunderstanding between him and the Tigers regarding him being extended.

He spoke of a particular new board member, is this for HBG (to replace Denny) or has the new wests Tigers board been selected. He spoke highly of all the great things Richo had achieved and the support he felt the team had achieved in 2025. But skirted around the elephant in the room, the HBG...

You’re the one that started the ‘assumption’ on the impact on players. Your knowledge of the players feelings is ……. “I think if you went and asked the playing group if they care or are upset about our former CEO resigning of a couple of board members being removed, you would be very surprised...

Hmmm I think PVL may contest that if pushed to far by HBG games

The board members may have changed but from what I understand the majority come from the debenture holders and any new debenture holders have been ‘accepted/selected’ by the existing debenture holders. Closed shop

I’m sure the media will spin it either way Bula doesn’t stay - tigers lose another star Bula stays - tigers pay overs to retain unproven player

HBG signed off on the review and independent nature of the wests tigers board. The independent board proved this as a correct decision by the improvement of all aspects of Wests Tigers. As stated many times, this is the same board that the chairman of HBG sat on and voted in favour of all...

They are not fit to run any organisation. What would/could wests Ashfield achieve with non $100 board members who select friends and family to join them.

Me too

And this outstanding HBG board have proven over a number of years that they are incapable of running a football club.

And appear to constantly do things to actually undermined progress

This ‘suggested’ support by PVL for Wests Tigers rather than HBG is great but only comforting whilst ever PVL is in control. The next leader ‘say’ in 5 years time, not an unreasonable likely end term for PVL, is when the current NRL club arrangements are suggested to be up for re evaluation. I...

I don’t think that falls under is umbrella of powers or likely powers of manipulation unless he can prompt gaming or whoever into some action

I still have difficulty in accepting ‘collective strength’ from a group that ‘burnt’ 3 very qualified independent board members