Search results

Its very relevant with some of the rubbish you're hurling about.

No - even clubs rorting the salary cap and having points ripped out and massive fines have not have their licences revoked. Canterburys infamous trip to Coffs Harbour that brought the game in to disrepute got a slap on the wrists. They did takeover Newcastles licence after Nathan Tinkler handed...

Yea there is - the original one was Sack the Harvey Barnes Group - lot of planning went in to that one.

I saw a report on the news today how Gen Z can't hack the stresses of work and life in general and how mental health issues are soaring in workplaces among this age group. Judging by some of the comments and OTT hand wringing on here i would say the report was pretty close to the mark.

Thats not true - Newcastle were owned by Nathan Tinkler - when he went broke he relinquished the licence and the NRL managed it until a buyer could be found. The NRL didn't just move in and take back the licence. Parramattas board was sacked for inappropriate payments to players by the Liquor...

I didn't say the business was being mismanaged - like everyone else on here i was finally happy that WT had become independent of HBG. i was only pointing out that an owner can legally dismiss a board for any number of reasons.

I don't give a damn about your point. I was laughing at some idiot who puts up a petition without even getting the names right of the entities he is petitioning to remove. But to answer your question - what would they sue them over - having the temerity to enact their right as an owner to sack...

The point is the whole petition is null and void - you are signing to get rid of an entity that doesn't exist. Maybe i'm wrong - maybe he also has a beef with Harvey Barnes the Newcastle United winger and Newcastle being the Magpies it could make sense.

Morons couldn't even get the name right on the petition. Being Balmain centric they got Barnes right but the have obviously never heard of Holman.

you are just talking nonsense - thats a whole new club - so the NRL are going to add Easts Brisbane Campbelltown Tigers as the 20th team - i don't think so.

I understand your frustration and i am appalled at what HBG are doing however i don't think Balmain can call the shots with anyone. Why on earth would Wests Campbelltown take on 10% of a club they have no say in and foot the bill as well. I would think Wests Campbelltown would only consider...

It was reported training staff were with him when he received the head knock in warm up and attended to him but did not report it to team doctor.

i don't think they have met him yet

Could do with one of these while watching the cricket.

Add Jake T to that as well - he was running on fumes last year.

Watched The Smashing Machine - makes B grade movies look like academy award winners

Maybe the chant should be just Ti in line with the 10% - the jerseys are shit and a total sellout by HBG that by the way most on here have belittled - bet your all happy now.

total shit

How good would it be if one of the Vegas teams gets a bye in round 2 - watch the proverbial hit the fan then.

that went well