Search results

* 8 board members (including the chairs), 4 HBG + 4 WT. Plus an additional 3 changes to HBG representation on the WT board.

Acceptance of bad behaviours and mediocrity is exactly the problem with this club.

@BZN People are talking out of anger and frustration. The anguish that Dennis and co have caused thousands of fans is far worse than a joke on a forum.

I don't think that qualification is correct either. This is completely demotivating. People who are supposed to direct the organisation you've bought into are making dumb decisions, yet expect excellence from you? Players read the media and some are WT fans since birth, hurting just like us. We...

This idea that it doesnt impact the footy team is such a incorrect statement and just tries removes responsibility for these dumb decisions. The HBG CEO said the same thing. Winning starts in the front office.

Just to try to understand @BZN and @Bus 2 Terrigal - Is your fear that if the debenture holders are moved to a more democratic structure, that things like Magpies in NSW cup would be removed? Or the magpie on the sleeve?

On something fundamental like our structure, I believe we do. That's what Richo was all about and why people are incredibly frustrated about his departure. He knew how to set a clear strategy, backed by data, and get the maximum support to go and implement it. We haven't seen that ever in our...

It was the HBG board, not WM. So the top 4 were involved. Would love to see the minutes if it was unanimous or not.

Teams are supposed to be united, and if you dont share the same vision, thats usually when people leave (i.e. galvin). Thats the frustration from people on here. We need to be united towards winning under one banner, and for the most part, are. HBG debenture holders are a very clear issue with...

Why is it not a license issue?

Yeah, he needs some friends! Was a powerful move from John - one not lost on me

It's you who doesn't get it BZN The eggs were cooked into a delicious omelet 25 years ago! Wests Tigers supporters support the Magpies in NSW cup, they are one of us, not something that needs to be split. I'm ex-balmain, but I'd cheer on the Magpies as hard as Balmain in NSW cup. Honestly...

Their actions at the moment make me think otherwise. Would love for the good guys to standup here.

The fact that the comprehensive list is not publicly available is also a significant transparency issue. These guys are supposed to represent the members.

Julie Romero? Or was her's stripped?

I think Chammas has some relationships with HBG, as he was going pretty soft and had those cracks at Richo. NRL can definitely do something as they hold the right to the license, but the devil is in the contract there. It might be that they have grounds to pull it now, or they might need to...

That's the one. I think the reps are actually technically split between 1 HGB and 1 Wests Magpies (Leo), but I did see a prior poster mention that he had joined the debenture holders too.

The thing chammas didnt say though was, if all this is true, why did they announce support for richo. The math aint mathing

Montgomery was the rep, but then replaced leo <insert last name here>. Again, showing their instability. Leo was inducted as a new debenture holder recently.

If we can get the debenture holders into a proper structure, accountable to members, then we'll need the ashfield memberships.